U.S. Supreme Court organization

also: California Supreme Court, Court, Israel's Supreme Court, SCOTUS, Supreme Court, SupremeCourt, Supreme Court Gang of Five, the bench, the court, the Court, The Court, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, the United States Supreme Court, United States Supreme Court, U.S Supreme Court, U.S. Supreme Court, US Supreme Court

Explore in graph → Export claims (CSV) ↓

Related entities (most co-mentioned)

Allen Dullesperson · 3 Skull and Bonesorganization · 3 Warren Commissionorganization · 3 Kelo v. City of New Londonevent · 3 Earl Warrenperson · 3 Potter Stewartperson · 2 Constitution Associationorganization · 2 George H.W. Bushperson · 2 United States Presidential Palaceorganization · 2 John F. Kennedyperson · 2 Tata Familyfamily · 2 Robert Borkensteinperson · 2 United Statescountry · 2 Bulloch v. United Statesevent · 1 Institute for Justiceorganization · 1 Lyndon B. Johnsonperson · 1 U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuitorganization · 1 Henry Luceperson · 1 Barack Obamaperson · 1 Ronald Reaganperson · 1 Franklin D. Rooseveltperson · 1 Chase Manhattan Bankorganization · 1 Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saintsorganization · 1 Joe Bidenperson · 1

Claims (81)

Louis Brandeis worked_for U.S. Supreme Court documented document

“Louis Brandeis, a leading Zionist and a close ally of Wilson who had been appointed as a Supreme Court Justice a year previously.…”

source: url — Balfour Declaration · p.1

U.S. Supreme Court proposed Joseph Ortiz documented document

“This point is reflected in the Court's decisions in Almeida-Sanchez and Ortiz in which the Court held that despite the interest in stemming illegal immigration searches of automobiles either at fixed checkpoints or by roving patrols in plac…”

source: government document — Church Committee Hearings, Volume 5: National Security Agency and Fourth Amendment Rights · p.103

Justice White worked_for U.S. Supreme Court documented document

“As Justice White said in the Camara case "there can be no ready test for determining reasonableness other than by balancing the need to search against the invasion which the search entails.…”

source: government document — Church Committee Hearings, Volume 5: National Security Agency and Fourth Amendment Rights · p.102

U.S. Supreme Court operated_in Mexico City documented document

“The Supreme Court with Justice Powell speaking said the lower court ought to say just when and where there can be inspections within 20 miles of the border of Mexico…”

source: government document — Church Committee Hearings, Volume 5: National Security Agency and Fourth Amendment Rights · p.144

U.S. Supreme Court proposed U.S. Congress documented document

“But Congress can prescribe some safe guards some rules and some standards just as we have with respect to your use of electronic surveillance and could do it with respect to informants…”

source: government document — Church Committee Hearings, Volume 6: Federal Bureau of Investigation · p.151

U.S. Supreme Court proposed FBI documented document

“here we get into the fact that the Supreme Court has held that the use of informants does not invade any of these constitutionally protected areas…”

source: government document — Church Committee Hearings, Volume 6: Federal Bureau of Investigation · p.162

U.S. Supreme Court worked_for John Marshall Harlan II documented document

“I was a law clerk to Mr Justice Harlan that year…”

source: government document — Church Committee Hearings, Volume 6: Federal Bureau of Investigation · p.271

U.S. Supreme Court worked_for Robert H. Jackson documented document

“The key opinion in that case although not the formal opinion of the Court was by Mr Justice Jackson…”

source: government document — Church Committee Hearings, Volume 6: Federal Bureau of Investigation · p.272

U.S. Supreme Court worked_for U.S. Congress documented document

“that ultimate power is not in the executive branch but in the Congress…”

source: government document — Church Committee Hearings, Volume 6: Federal Bureau of Investigation · p.272

Louis Brandeis worked_for U.S. Supreme Court documented document

“The best expression I know of that philosophy which I think should guide this committee is a concurring opinion by Justice Brandeis in the case called Whitney v California decided in 1927…”

source: government document — Church Committee Hearings, Volume 6: Federal Bureau of Investigation · p.274

U.S. Supreme Court linked_to Black Panthers documented document

“There are cases for example the Panther 21 case in New York where there were informants in the Black Panther organization which was a case where I think it was raised…”

source: government document — Church Committee Hearings, Volume 6: Federal Bureau of Investigation · p.289

U.S. Supreme Court limited U.S. Department of Justice documented document

“Section 2385 has been restricted to a fraction by the Supreme Court.…”

source: government document — Church Committee Hearings, Volume 6: Federal Bureau of Investigation · p.553

U.S. Supreme Court overthrew Standard Oil documented document

“In 1911 Standard Oil of New Jersey was split up by the United States Supreme Court.…”

source: url — William Rockefeller Jr. · p.1

U.S. Supreme Court linked_to John F. Kennedy documented document

“As the Supreme Court has stated the Constitution "is not a suicide pact. (Kennedy v Men doza-Martinez 372 U.S 144 160 (1963) )…”

source: government document — Alleged Assassination Plots Involving Foreign Leaders (Church Committee Interim Report) · p.298

U.S. Supreme Court linked_to Mendoza-Martinez documented document

“As the Supreme Court has stated the Constitution "is not a suicide pact. (Kennedy v Men doza-Martinez 372 U.S 144 160 (1963) )…”

source: government document — Alleged Assassination Plots Involving Foreign Leaders (Church Committee Interim Report) · p.298

U.S. Supreme Court linked_to warrantless electronic surveillance documented document

“As the Supreme Court noted in 1972 in commenting on warrantless electronic surveillance the practice had been permitted by successive presidents for more than a quarter of a century without "guidance from the Congress or a definitive decisi…”

source: government document — Church Committee Final Report, Book I: Foreign and Military Intelligence · p.19

Chief Justice Marshall worked_for U.S. Supreme Court documented document

“In Little v Barreme,37 Chief Justice Marshall speaking for the Court found the seizure by the U.S Navy of a ship departing a French port to be unlawful…”

source: government document — Church Committee Final Report, Book I: Foreign and Military Intelligence · p.47

George Shiras member_of U.S. Supreme Court documented document

“The lawyer, George Shiras, was confirmed in a week even though he had neither judicial nor political experience—the only Supreme Court justice to be so unqualified.…”

source: book — Superclass: The Global Power Elite and the World They Are Making · p.129

U.S. Supreme Court dissolved Standard Oil documented document

“And when that company grew so large that the Supreme Court mandated its breakup, in 1911, he was hardly defeated.…”

source: book — Superclass: The Global Power Elite and the World They Are Making · p.132

U.S. Supreme Court exposed Federal Bureau of Investigation documented document

“In 1956 the Supreme Court recognized the existence of FBI intelligence aimed at Communist seditious activities.…”

source: government document — Church Committee Final Report, Book II: Intelligence Activities and the Rights of Americans · p.57

U.S. Supreme Court removed_from_power Belgian Communist Party documented document

“the Court overturned the convictions of second-string Communist leaders…”

source: government document — Church Committee Final Report, Book II: Intelligence Activities and the Rights of Americans · p.57

U.S. Supreme Court founded Subversive Activities Control Board documented document

“In 1961 the Court sustained the constitutionality under the First Amendment of the requirement that the Communist Party register with the Subversive Acivities Control Board.…”

source: government document — Church Committee Final Report, Book II: Intelligence Activities and the Rights of Americans · p.57

U.S. Supreme Court removed_from_power U.S. Department of Justice documented document

“As a result of this decision the Justice Department eliminated as criteria for the use of warrantless electronic surveillance the two categories described by Congress in the 1968 Act dealing with domestic intelligence interests.…”

source: government document — Church Committee Final Report, Book II: Intelligence Activities and the Rights of Americans · p.123

U.S. Supreme Court operated_in United States documented document

“The United States Supreme Court has never ruled on whether the use of intelligence informants in the contexts revealed by the Committee's investigation offend First Amendment rights of freedom of expression and association.…”

source: government document — Church Committee Final Report, Book II: Intelligence Activities and the Rights of Americans · p.202

U.S. Supreme Court exposed Olmstead case documented document

“In 1967 the Supreme Court reversed its holding in the Olmstead case and decided that the Fourth Amendment's warrant requirement did apply to electronic surveillances.…”

source: government document — Church Committee Final Report, Book II: Intelligence Activities and the Rights of Americans · p.204

U.S. Supreme Court exposed United States v. United States District Court documented document

“In 1972 the Supreme Court held in United States v United States District Court that the President did not have the constitutional power to authorize warrantless electronic surveillances to protect the nation from domestic threats.…”

source: government document — Church Committee Final Report, Book II: Intelligence Activities and the Rights of Americans · p.204

U.S. Supreme Court did_business_with NAACP documented document

“the Supreme Court in NAACP v Alabama,66 held that the First Amendment's protections of speech assembly and group association did not permit a state to compel the production of the membership list of a group engaged in lawful activity…”

source: government document — Church Committee Final Report, Book II: Intelligence Activities and the Rights of Americans · p.213

U.S. Supreme Court did_business_with City of Little Rock documented document

“Similarly in Bates v City of Little Rock 361 U.S 516 (1960) the SupremeCourt held compulsorydisclosureof group membership lists was an unjustified interference with members freedom of association…”

source: government document — Church Committee Final Report, Book II: Intelligence Activities and the Rights of Americans · p.213

Robert Jackson worked_for U.S. Supreme Court documented document

“Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson previously an Attorney General warned against growth of a centralized power of investigation…”

source: government document — Church Committee Final Report, Book II: Intelligence Activities and the Rights of Americans · p.307

U.S. Supreme Court dissolved Smith Act documented document

“The Supreme Court rulings had rendered the Smith Act technically unenforceable... It made it ineffective to prosecute Communist Party members…”

source: government document — Church Committee Final Report, Book III: Supplementary Detailed Staff Reports on Intelligence Activities and the Rights of Americans · p.16

U.S. Supreme Court decided Hoffa v. United States documented document

“In Hoffa v United States,18 a criminal case involving charges of bribing a jury the Supreme Court held that an informant's testimony concerning a defendant's conversations could not be considered the product of a search where the defendant …”

source: government document — Church Committee Final Report, Book III: Supplementary Detailed Staff Reports on Intelligence Activities and the Rights of Americans · p.237

U.S. Supreme Court decided Lewis v. United States documented document

“In another criminal case Lewis v United States 385U.S 206 (1966) the Court in decliningto rule that the use of undercover agents is unconstitutional per se stated "In the detection of many types of crime the Government is entitled to use de…”

source: government document — Church Committee Final Report, Book III: Supplementary Detailed Staff Reports on Intelligence Activities and the Rights of Americans · p.237

U.S. Supreme Court proposed Olmstead v United States documented document

“This decision the 1928 case of Olmstead v United States 277 U.S 438 arose in the context of a criminal prosecution…”

source: government document — Church Committee Final Report, Book III: Supplementary Detailed Staff Reports on Intelligence Activities and the Rights of Americans · p.280

U.S. Supreme Court proposed Katz v United States documented document

“The Supreme Court reversed its holding in the Olmstead case in 1967 holding in Katz v United States 389 U.S 347 (1967) that the Fourth Amendment's warrant requirement did apply to electronic surveillances…”

source: government document — Church Committee Final Report, Book III: Supplementary Detailed Staff Reports on Intelligence Activities and the Rights of Americans · p.281

U.S. Supreme Court proposed United States v. United States District Court documented document

“In 1972 the Supreme Court again addressed the issue of warrantless electronic surveillance It held in United States v United States District Court 407 U.S 297 (1972)…”

source: government document — Church Committee Final Report, Book III: Supplementary Detailed Staff Reports on Intelligence Activities and the Rights of Americans · p.281

U.S. Supreme Court exposed Section 605 of the Federal Communications Act documented document

“The Supreme Court construed this section in 1937 to apply to Federal agents and held that evidence obtained from the interception of wire and radio communications was inadmissible in court.…”

source: government document — Church Committee Final Report, Book III: Supplementary Detailed Staff Reports on Intelligence Activities and the Rights of Americans · p.284

U.S. Supreme Court exposed Berger v New York documented document

“In Berger v New York 388 U.S 41 (1967) and Katz v United States 389 U.S 347 (1967) the Supreme Court overruled Olmstead and held that the Fourth Amendment did apply to searches and seizures of conversations and protected all conversations o…”

source: government document — Church Committee Final Report, Book III: Supplementary Detailed Staff Reports on Intelligence Activities and the Rights of Americans · p.294

U.S. Supreme Court exposed Katz v United States documented document

source: government document — Church Committee Final Report, Book III: Supplementary Detailed Staff Reports on Intelligence Activities and the Rights of Americans · p.294

U.S. Supreme Court overthrew Olmstead documented document

source: government document — Church Committee Final Report, Book III: Supplementary Detailed Staff Reports on Intelligence Activities and the Rights of Americans · p.294

U.S. Supreme Court exposed United States v. United States District Court documented document

“As the Supreme Court noted in the Keith case it is merely a statement that to the extent such powers exist if they exist at all they override the procedural requirements for electronic surveillance that are outlined in this statute and in t…”

source: government document — Church Committee Final Report, Book III: Supplementary Detailed Staff Reports on Intelligence Activities and the Rights of Americans · p.295

U.S. Supreme Court proposed Keith case documented document

“On June 19 1972 the Supreme Court decided the so-called Keith case United States v United States District Court 407 U.S 297 (1972) which held that the Fourth Amendment required prior judicial approval for 'domestic security electronic surve…”

source: government document — Church Committee Final Report, Book III: Supplementary Detailed Staff Reports on Intelligence Activities and the Rights of Americans · p.296

Robert Jackson worked_for U.S. Supreme Court documented document

“Only in retrospect as a Justice of the Supreme Court did Robert Jackson recognize these dangers…”

source: government document — Church Committee Final Report, Book III: Supplementary Detailed Staff Reports on Intelligence Activities and the Rights of Americans · p.417

James Roswell Beckwith worked_for U.S. Supreme Court documented document

“US Attorney James Roswell Beckwith, based in New Orleans, sent a telegram about the massacre to the US Attorney General.…”

source: url — Colfax massacre · p.1

William Burnham Woods worked_for U.S. Supreme Court documented document

“William Burnham Woods presided over the first trial...…”

source: url — Colfax massacre · p.1

Joseph B. Bradley worked_for U.S. Supreme Court documented document

“the presiding judge, Joseph Bradley of the United States Supreme Court (riding circuit)...…”

source: url — Colfax massacre · p.1

Oliver Wendell Holmes worked_for U.S. Supreme Court documented document

“Mr Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Dissenting in Gitlow v New York 268 U.S 652 (1925)…”

source: government document — Church Committee Final Report, Book III: Supplementary Detailed Staff Reports on Intelligence Activities and the Rights of Americans · p.433

Fred Vinson worked_for U.S. Supreme Court documented document

“Mr Chief Justice Fred Vinson Opinion in Dennis v United States 341 U.S 494 (1951)…”

source: government document — Church Committee Final Report, Book III: Supplementary Detailed Staff Reports on Intelligence Activities and the Rights of Americans · p.433

U.S. Supreme Court targeted_for_regime_change Belgian Communist Party documented document

“At the peak of international tension during the Korean War the Supreme Court upheld the conviction of Communist Party leaders under the Smith Act for conspiracy to advocate violent overthrow of the government…”

source: government document — Church Committee Final Report, Book III: Supplementary Detailed Staff Reports on Intelligence Activities and the Rights of Americans · p.433

James F. Byrnes member_of U.S. Supreme Court documented document

“having served in the House and Senate and on the Supreme Court…”

source: government document — Church Committee Final Report, Book IV: Supplementary Detailed Staff Reports on Foreign and Military Intelligence · p.12

U.S. Supreme Court covered_up Harry S. Truman documented document

“The Supreme Court's disapproval of President Truman's seizure of the steel mills is an example…”

source: government document — Church Committee Final Report, Book IV: Supplementary Detailed Staff Reports on Foreign and Military Intelligence · p.163

William Howard Taft worked_for U.S. Supreme Court documented document

“former President Taft writing the majority opinion of the Supreme Court as Chief Justice in the Myers case appealed to the opening clause of Article II of the Constitution as a grant of power…”

source: government document — Church Committee Final Report, Book VI: Supplementary Reports on Intelligence Activities · p.11

U.S. Supreme Court dissolved Post Office documented document

“And the Court held that the act as construed and applied is unconstitutional since it imposes on the addressee an affirmative obligation which amounts to an unconstitutional limitation of his rights under the first amendment…”

source: government document — Church Committee Hearings, Volume 4: Mail Opening · p.173

Justice Holmes worked_for U.S. Supreme Court documented document

“A previous decision by Mr Justice Holmes is quoted favorably in which Mr Justice Holmes wrote…”

source: government document — Church Committee Hearings, Volume 4: Mail Opening · p.173

Colin Powell worked_for U.S. Supreme Court documented document

“In speaking of this saving clause justice Powell in the Keith case in 1972 wrote…”

source: government document — Church Committee Hearings, Volume 5: National Security Agency and Fourth Amendment Rights · p.74

U.S. Supreme Court proposed Keith case documented document

“In the Keith case the Supreme Court held that in the field of internal security if there was no foreign involvement a judicial warrant was required for the Fourth Amendment…”

source: government document — Church Committee Hearings, Volume 5: National Security Agency and Fourth Amendment Rights · p.74

James Madison proposed U.S. Supreme Court documented document

“The words of the Fourth Amendment are mostly the product of James Madison…”

source: government document — Church Committee Hearings, Volume 5: National Security Agency and Fourth Amendment Rights · p.76

Justice Brandeis worked_for U.S. Supreme Court documented document

“As Justice Brandeis observed in his dissent in the Olmstead case…”

source: government document — Church Committee Hearings, Volume 5: National Security Agency and Fourth Amendment Rights · p.77

Judge Jerome Frank worked_for U.S. Supreme Court documented document

“Judge Jerome Frank made the same point in a dissent in a case in which a paid informer with a concealed microphone broadcast an intercepted conversation to a narcotics agent…”

source: government document — Church Committee Hearings, Volume 5: National Security Agency and Fourth Amendment Rights · p.77

Felix Frankfurter worked_for U.S. Supreme Court documented document

“As Justice Frankfurter inquired dissenting in Harris v United States…”

source: government document — Church Committee Hearings, Volume 5: National Security Agency and Fourth Amendment Rights · p.77

Colin Powell worked_for U.S. Supreme Court documented document

“So Justice Powell stated in Keith…”

source: government document — Church Committee Hearings, Volume 5: National Security Agency and Fourth Amendment Rights · p.77

U.S. Supreme Court proposed Blade v. United States documented document

“The policy of the Department was stated publicly by the Solicitor General in a supplemental brief in the Supreme Court in Blade v United States in 1966…”

source: government document — Church Committee Hearings, Volume 5: National Security Agency and Fourth Amendment Rights · p.92

U.S. Supreme Court proposed United States v. United States District Court documented document

“In the Keith case the Supreme Court held that in the field of internal security if there was no foreign involvement a judicial warrant was required by the fourth amendment…”

source: government document — Church Committee Hearings, Volume 5: National Security Agency and Fourth Amendment Rights · p.93

Lord Camden worked_for U.S. Supreme Court documented document

“These warrants... were finally condemned by Lord Camden in 1765 in Entitle v Carrington, a decision later celebrated by the Supreme Court as a landmark of English liberty...…”

source: government document — Church Committee Hearings, Volume 5: National Security Agency and Fourth Amendment Rights · p.96

U.S. Supreme Court proposed Camara v. Municipal Court documented document

“But the doctrine of Camara proved to be limited…”

source: government document — Church Committee Hearings, Volume 5: National Security Agency and Fourth Amendment Rights · p.102

U.S. Supreme Court proposed Frank v. Maryland documented document

“The Supreme Court rejected the Frank rationale that municipal fire health and housing inspections could be conducted without a warrant…”

source: government document — Church Committee Hearings, Volume 5: National Security Agency and Fourth Amendment Rights · p.102

U.S. Supreme Court proposed Wyman v James documented document

“In 1971 in Wyman v James the Court held that a "home visit by a welfare caseworker which entailed termination of benefits if the welfare recipient refused entry was lawful despite the absence of a warrant…”

source: government document — Church Committee Hearings, Volume 5: National Security Agency and Fourth Amendment Rights · p.102

U.S. Supreme Court proposed Warden v Hayden documented document

“This notion long eroded in practice was expressly abandoned by the Court in 1967 in Warden v Hayden…”

source: government document — Church Committee Hearings, Volume 5: National Security Agency and Fourth Amendment Rights · p.103

U.S. Supreme Court proposed Terry v Ohio documented document

“In Terry v Ohio the Court held that a policeman in order to protect himself and others nearby may conduct a limited "pat down" search for weapons when he has reasonable grounds for believing that criminal conduct is taking place and that th…”

source: government document — Church Committee Hearings, Volume 5: National Security Agency and Fourth Amendment Rights · p.103

U.S. Supreme Court proposed United States v Brignoni-Ponce documented document

“Last term in United States v Brignoni-Ponce the Court held that if an officer has a "founded suspicion" that a car in a border areas contains illegal aliens the officer may stop the car and ask the occupants to explain suspicious circumstan…”

source: government document — Church Committee Hearings, Volume 5: National Security Agency and Fourth Amendment Rights · p.103

U.S. Supreme Court proposed Almeida-Sanchez documented document

source: government document — Church Committee Hearings, Volume 5: National Security Agency and Fourth Amendment Rights · p.103

John Jay headed U.S. Supreme Court guest_asserted

“And John Jay, who was a Hamiltonian, he also served as our first chief justice of the United States Supreme Court…”

▶ Constitution Class-Is Pres Kamala constitutional_ W Douglas&Brady @ 11:54

William O. Douglas appointed U.S. Supreme Court book_quoted

“the newly formed Wall Street watchdog agency, and later appointed a justice on the Supreme Court. As FDR's top Wall Street regulator, Douglas had more than one occasion to work with John Foster Dulles. Years later, Dulles' hatred for the se…”

▶ The Colonel’s Corner The Devil’s Chessboard Part 2 @ 27:13

Potter Stewart member_of U.S. Supreme Court host_asserted

“We also have Potter Stewart, who did become the Supreme Court. We've talked about him before because he was an alumni of Skull and Bones, one of four. I think there's five different Supreme Court members that have affiliations to Skull and …”

▶ Operation Gladio meets Secret Societies with WarHamster Bady 2025-05-22 @ 28:20

Potter Stewart member_of U.S. Supreme Court host_asserted

“I would say Luce, Henry Luce, the Time Magazine one. That's one I didn't know. When I first found that out, I go, okay, that makes a lot of sense. I'll skip to some other good ones. Potter Stewart, who ended up being a Supreme Court justice…”

▶ The Shadow State 33 Secret Societies 17; Freemason Preview @ 57:43

U.S. Supreme Court ruled_in Kelo v. City of New London documented

“The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that the government could take away your private property to increase the tax base. Since that was a public interest, they determined. Now the case is going on 20, actually it's 20 years old this year. It's 2005.…”

▶ The Colonel’s Corner Inauguration Special @ 1:13:34

Robert Borkenstein appointed U.S. Supreme Court host_asserted

“So he's been in the mix of everything. Amazing amount of diplomats and some of the craziest places all from the same boarding schools. Okay, we got some people in the judiciary that are worth mentioning. Robert Bork, who of course got borke…”

▶ Operation Gladio meets Secret Societies with WarHamster Bady 2025-05-22 @ 27:19

U.S. Supreme Court removed_from_power National Recovery Administration host_asserted

“And you have to understand that the war was used as an excuse to pass the NRA. I'm not going to remember the name of it. We ended up with the NRIA. The original bill was going to make us a socialist country under Roosevelt. And it was so in…”

▶ OPERATION GLADIO Exposed by COLONEL TOWNER in Presidents' Secret Wars Chapter 3 @ 1:12:57

Maggie Goodlander appointed U.S. Supreme Court host_asserted

“All right, so after her Yale law, we'll get to her intelligence here in a second. She's a law clerk for none other than Merrick Garland on the U.S. Court of Appeals. Okay. And then she becomes a clerk for former Supreme Court Justice Stephe…”

▶ Operation Gladio meets Secret Societies with War Hamster Brady 250418 @ 46:55

Morrison Waite headed U.S. Supreme Court guest_asserted

“And Chief Justice Morrison Waite, I think is his name, if I remember properly, in his judicial opinion wrote, well, she's a natural born citizen, right? Born of two citizen parents.…”

▶ Constitution Class-Is Pres Kamala constitutional_ W Douglas&Brady @ 27:55

U.S. Supreme Court removed_from_power Cornel West caller_asserted

“wouldn't let JFK or excuse me, RFK to get off the ballot. Right. She would not allow him to to remove his name off of that ballot. Now, Cornel West tried to remove his name from the ballot. She said, OK. And the Supreme Court there said, oh…”

▶ Operation Gladio - Vietnam Phoenix Program @ 1:33:53

U.S. Supreme Court covered_up Barack Obama speculative

“the Supreme Court will do everything in their power not to address it because that really it's an attack on the establishment. If Barack Obama is declared legitimate, that's a sacred cow they don't ever want to sacrifice.…”

▶ Constitution Class-Is Pres Kamala constitutional_ W Douglas&Brady @ 1:25:21