GLADIOARCHIVEAND BEYOND
sign in

United States v. United States District Court event

also: the Keith case, United States v United States District Court

Explore in graph → Export claims (CSV) ↓

Claims (5)

U.S. Supreme Court exposed United States v. United States District Court documented document
“In 1972 the Supreme Court held in United States v United States District Court that the President did not have the constitutional power to authorize warrantless electronic surveillances to protect the nation from domestic threats.…”
source: government document — Church Committee Final Report, Book II: Intelligence Activities and the Rights of Americans · p.204
U.S. Supreme Court proposed United States v. United States District Court documented document
“In 1972 the Supreme Court again addressed the issue of warrantless electronic surveillance It held in United States v United States District Court 407 U.S 297 (1972)…”
source: government document — Church Committee Final Report, Book III: Supplementary Detailed Staff Reports on Intelligence Activities and the Rights of Americans · p.281
U.S. Supreme Court exposed United States v. United States District Court documented document
“As the Supreme Court noted in the Keith case it is merely a statement that to the extent such powers exist if they exist at all they override the procedural requirements for electronic surveillance that are outlined in this statute and in t…”
source: government document — Church Committee Final Report, Book III: Supplementary Detailed Staff Reports on Intelligence Activities and the Rights of Americans · p.295
Philip Hart proposed United States v. United States District Court documented document
“The Court quoted the remarks of Senator Philip Hart that [N]othing in Section 2511(3) even attemrpts to define the limits of the President's national security power under present law which I have always found extremely vague…”
source: government document — Church Committee Final Report, Book III: Supplementary Detailed Staff Reports on Intelligence Activities and the Rights of Americans · p.295
U.S. Supreme Court proposed United States v. United States District Court documented document
“In the Keith case the Supreme Court held that in the field of internal security if there was no foreign involvement a judicial warrant was required by the fourth amendment…”
source: government document — Church Committee Hearings, Volume 5: National Security Agency and Fourth Amendment Rights · p.93

Mentions (0)

Credits

Built from the work of the podcasters whose episodes this archive indexes:

Colonel Towner-Watkins X Rumble
War_Hamster Brady X Rumble