OPERATION GLADIO Exposed by COLONEL TOWNER in The Empire on Which the Black Sun Never Set, Chapter 3

1:14:32 · recorded 2023-10-26 · ▶ watch on Rumble

auto-scroll word highlight ▶ Rumble @ here

Transcript

0:29 Let's go ahead and check the sound. Is that good? Can everybody hear me? Can anybody hear me? I want to do a sound check real quick, make sure everybody can hear. Hi, Julie, can you hear me? Okay, awesome. So did you see my post today about the poppies? Yes? Okay, so just a quick story before we get started.

2:18 During the Air Force Aid Society drive every year, they would hand out the poppy little like lapel with the safety pin on them. We weren't allowed to wear them on our uniform, but every year I remember there being the big controversy because I worked in personnel that was responsible for uniform wear for most of my, well, the first.

2:49 part of my officer career anyway. And there would always be the question run around that the same day that the campaign started off. Oh, hey, are we allowed to wear that? No, you're not allowed to wear that on your uniform. But today that came across my husband's Facebook account. And both of us are just looking at each other going, oh my gosh, never made the connection.

3:19 But again, it's in your face. So for those of you who haven't seen the post, there's a picture that's basically honoring Veterans Day. And it has the picture of the poppy, the actual flower. And a couple of times a year, there would be like fundraising campaigns in the military. And they would use the, sorry about that.

3:51 They would use the poppy. It's just a little flower that was probably about two to three inches in diameter on like a safety pin with a little piece of felt like they had hot glued them together. And we were just awestruck by the fact that it's always right there in your face. And for those of you who've not been with us the entire time, what we have discovered.

4:21 is that basically the military in large parts mission has been dictated in the past by where the opium production, i.e. poppy fields, are the most active because that is where the CIA gets us involved in wars. So we're basically kind of the opium protection force as opposed to a U.S. military force.

4:48 when it comes down to actually what we've accomplished as opposed to what we think we're there for. So anyway, we'll just kick that off here because Operation Gladio, in large respect, we understood is like a big cycle of let the war follow the poppy field production. And that's where we're going to engage militarily. And the drug sales profits go to buy weapons, people.

5:20 And they're generated from those fields. They go through manufacturing facilities originally in France and Marseille and in Sicily. But you can see kind of the drug flows and then Cuba and then into the United States. So money laundering is associated with that and everything else. So I just thought it was funny.

5:47 So today we're going to start with chapter three. I'm not sure we'll get to chapter four. It just depends on how fast this goes. But this author does a really good job, as I have said in the past, of setting up the background. So what seems to be kind of annoying details when you're reading the book gets highlighted and put into context in some of the later chapters. In chapter three, she's setting up the.

6:15 special relationship between the British Empire and the American experiment, if you will. And it's a very interesting, nuanced approach. And we're going to uncover a couple of things that I didn't know. Hopefully it'll be news to you as well, so you don't feel like you're wasting your time here. So basically, she sets the stage in describing two

6:46 We think of Britain as kind of a very similar country. But in reality, we have very little in common with them from other than language. And her point is that the British is an empire. We do have a few like Guam and Puerto Rico protectorates, if you will. But America.

7:15 was not and hasn't ever been an empire. So for those of you who don't know, England has Canada, Australia, a lot of islands in the Caribbean. They had Hong Kong, India. At the time, you know, because this is back in the late 1700s and early 1800s setting.

7:43 They were genuinely an empire, as were most of the European countries. They all had colonies in Africa, which we said last time they viewed strictly as slave colonies. Every African country was a plantation for them. And that's it. So the British during the Civil War supported the Confederate Army and not the North at all.

8:15 Tsar Alexander II ended up deploying the Russian Navy to both the Pacific and the Atlantic shores. And he did that after a meeting. Let me read you. It says Tsar Alexander explained in an interview why he did this. And it was the interview was in 1879. It was written about in 1904, quote.

8:46 In the autumn of 1862, the government of France and Great Britain proposed to Russia in a formal but not official way, the joint recognition of European powers of the independence of the Confederate States of America. My immediate answer, saying the czar, I will not cooperate in such action. I will not acquiesce. On the contrary, I shall accept the recognition of the independence of the Confederate States by France and Great Britain.

9:16 as a Casa Bali for Russia. And in order that the governments of France and Great Britain may understand that this is no idle threat, I will send the Pacific fleet to San Francisco and the Atlantic fleet to New York, dot, dot, dot. All this I did because of my love for dear Russia, rather than a love for American Republic. I acted thus because I understood that Russia would have a more serious task to perform if the American Republic,

9:46 with its advanced industrial development, were broken up and Great Britain should be left in control of most of the branches of modern industrial development. So keep in mind what was going on during that time is a lot of American businesses were trying to break into the Russian market. So they recognized the industrial might of America and Tsar Nicholas recognized, more importantly,

10:16 that we had surpassed economically Britain. With all of their vast resources because of their colonial imperialism, their slave colony, America was still ahead. And he viewed very much that allowing, and let me go on for just a second. In other words, Tsar Nicholas understood that the U.S. had created the only economic system that would compete.

10:45 with Britain's slave-based economic policy. In stark contrast to this sentiment, Lord Salisbury, who we know as Lord Robert Cecil, who served three times as Prime Minister of Britain between 1885 and 1902, had this to say about the American Civil War. The northern states of America never can be friends because we are rivals. Rivals politically,

11:17 rivals commercially. With the southern states, the case is entirely reversed. The population of the agricultural people, they furnish the raw materials for our industry and they consume our products. With them, our interest is basically more compatible. So they view anybody as an ally that they can subjugate.

11:48 into their imperial community if you're a peer you are not their friend and that's why over the last couple of days i've taken huge exception to the word ally especially when it refers to israel because i want somebody to define ally for me an ally isn't somebody who bombs the uss liberty an ally is not somebody who embeds spies into your country that very much tells me

12:18 that you are not an ally. An ally doesn't spy. So anyway, and obviously this is in large part around the cotton production and other resources that are being produced in the South. So keep in mind, we learned last chapter that Lord Salisbury was the father of Lord Robert Cecil, the architect of the League of Nations. So you understand immediately.

12:55 that the League of Nations was basically a way of subjugating other countries to the dictatorial preferences of these sectioned off pieces of the globe that we talked about in last chapter. So it's also interesting to note that the ships that were coming to America to pick up cotton, what did those ships bring to America?

13:26 drugs, opium, they weren't necessarily bringing things good for America. Because if you follow the trade route, a lot of the manufacturing of the cotton products happened in India, not because again, there's no industrial capability in Britain. So we would be shipping cotton to India. They pick up drugs and bring drugs, opium back into the Western hemisphere.

13:55 Along with spices and everything, I'm not saying it's completely drug related, but hey, we got our poppy pen. The American Civil War was about two different economic systems in opposition to each other. So that's kind of setting up the background. And again, I want you to understand where Russia falls in this. Because over time, you're going to see.

14:25 that none of the countries that we view as enemies of America were actually ever enemies of America. But you have a lot of reason why these powers to be, if you will, like Britain, would despise Russia, because they seem to always pop up and thwart their plans. In 1879, Otto von Bismarck broke Germany's free trade system.

14:56 implementing an American-style tariff policy for his nation, which did not make him friends with his counterparts. The kinship between Germany and the United States became so strong at this time that Bismarck gave a speech and was quoted by the future U.S. President McKinley on the floor of the U.S. Congress, quote, a success of the U.S. in material development.

15:26 is the most illustrious of modern times. The American nation has not only successfully borne and suppressed the most gigantic and expensive war of all history, referring to the Civil War, but immediately afterwards disbanded its army, found employment for all of its soldiers and Marines, paid off most of its debt, given labor and homes to all of the unemployed in Europe as fast as they could arrive within the territory.

15:55 And still by a system of taxation so indirect as not to be perceived, much less felt. Now, all of us paying taxes are going, what the hell is he talking about? Let me tell you what he's talking about, because I just recently found this out myself. Our original tax system and the whole reason that we have a U.S. census was because at the time.

16:25 Taxes were appropriated to the state based on the number of citizens in each state proportionately. So if you had a state that had 100 people in it and you had a state that had 50 and 50, then state one would get half or a quarter of the taxation. And that was based on the number of people in the state. So the state capital had to pay the tax bill.

16:56 for all of the people in their states and that allowed the state governors to do the job of policing the federal government not the citizenry it was never the job of the citizen to police a federal government it was always the state legislature by running the elections and the gut and appointing senators by the way and the governor

17:27 For paying the tax bill on behalf of his citizens. That was the check and balance that our founders built in. And you can see the other countries thought it was a marvelous invention on how to hold in check a federal government. So also he went on to say.

17:51 The prosperity of America is mainly due to its protective laws. I urge that Germany now reach the point that where it is necessary to initiate the tariff system of the United States. Another thing I will point out is who used the tariff system better than any president in protection of America? Donald J. Trump. And who complained the most about him using the tariff system?

18:20 which is greatly admired across the globe as a way to protect your country. So the fascist, the UN, the global international syndicate, all despise Donald Trump's use of tariffs because that's how you protect America. And they don't want America protected. That's what all of that tells you.

18:51 Otto von Bismarck was heavily organizing for the building of the Berlin to Baghdad railroad. That railroad, unfortunately, did not get completed until 1940 because they ran into all kinds of obstructionists. Imagine that. As a result, it is his belief that the sectioning of the Middle East would have never occurred.

19:16 post-World War II and along all the fault lines that we've talked about before, where it's my opinion that these countries that were made up out of whole cloth, like Iraq, who had boundaries, the, you know, Persia became Iran with weird boundaries, Syria, weird boundaries, and all of them on fault lines, dividing cultural, like Kurdish people on the borders of,

19:46 four or five different countries, then creating problems for all four or five of those countries. It was all done on purpose to create chaos in the Middle East. And had that railroad got to Baghdad earlier, what you would have seen is a lot of economic boom in the late 1800s there and could have potentially not resulted in all of the turmoil that we saw later on.

20:16 Also, the difference between the initiatives of sovereign nation states modeled off of the American system versus the League of Nations proposal for the United States of America. And so we heard last time that the UN was advocating that we divide the globe up into basically six entities and that each one of them have like a pan-America, a pan-Europe, a pan-Asia.

20:45 And what was left out of the mix was Africa and the Arabs because the snots, snobs, elitist in the Britain mainly hierarchy viewed those people as labor providers only, not as real human beings. So the American system economic model was that the nation's economic sovereignty was the core.

21:15 of every policy. Under the system of sovereign nation states, countries benefit most by participating and facilitating trade between each other. But as sovereigns, they are not at the economic mercy of any country and have the economic freedom to determine their own future for the welfare of their citizenry. It also recognizes that in order to have an economic independence, a country needs to become industrialized through the development of machine tool industry.

21:46 which of course is why ours was dismantled. This is not a system reliant on slave labor, which has been the typical British style in the past. So Germany was basically developing a model that very much mimicked America under their, not Hitler, their former guy in the late 1800s.

22:18 And he wished to maximize free trade between the American system and Germany. He also recognized these three elements that keep coming up. Sovereign nations have to have a common currency, free flowing trade, and a banking system that facilitates the trade from within. So we see those three things that keep coming up.

22:48 And every time we see one of these top-down driven models, whether it was the Madrid circular or in any of those other books that we read, I told you all about the Islamic unity pact that was created under the UAE for the trade within the Arabic. They had these same three things.

23:16 They know that if they can control your currency and they can control trade and they have the banking system that they control the country. And those three things keep coming up over and over in this deep dive that we've been doing. The American system is what allowed the U.S. to propel past the bankrupt British empire as a super economic force. And they never got over it.

23:42 The League of Nations proposition of the U.S. of Europe was to effectively look at every nation in Europe as a colony within an overarching empire. And so what we talked about last time is they had a kind of a controversy on whether or not England was going to be incorporated in the pan-Europe model that they were trying to advocate, because England in its empire already.

24:11 incorporated where they were going in the New World Order. So they wanted Europe to basically create its own integrated empire. And they viewed the League of Nations as the vehicle to get there. So the League of Nations advocated for regionalization that we've been talking about. Countries within their designated region would be beholden to the economic policy and the destiny of that region. And of course, they would orchestrate the whole thing.

24:44 But what it basically does and what we've seen with the EU is all the smaller countries lose their sovereignty. They'll basically not get any say at all. They become vassal states of this pan Europe, whatever. Thus, a country is not free to act on its own welfare, even if the consequences is devastating.

25:09 So clearly in support of empire imperialism and segregation, also for the idea of the League of Nations, that that's what represents the EU. Divided between a few empires, namely the British Empire, the American Empire, a renewed Habsburg Empire, which is pan-Europe, and a Japanese Empire, and the British Empire would be the top dog in the whole hierarchy.

25:39 In 1869, the Japanese modernizers worked directly with Lincoln slash Kerry strategists to basically create an industrialized Japan at the same time that Germany was kind of mimicking what we were doing. They contracted for huge infrastructure projects, nation building projects, and China was also on board with this.

26:07 There was a guy by the name of Sun Yat-sen, Y-A-T-S-E-N. Yat-sen? That's what we're going to call him. And he basically gave birth to modern China. He was the first president of the Republic of China and is considered one of the founding fathers of the People's Republic of China, not the communist part. Yat-sen.

26:38 led China's revolution to free itself from the corruption of the Qing Dynasty. Again, y'all know if you've been here for a little bit, though the names of these things are interesting to say the least. He was a follower of Confucius, but also converted to Christianity after his stay in Hawaii.

27:06 where he organized with American patriots of the school of Abraham Lincoln and Henry C. Carey. Sue Yatzen is considered one of the greatest leaders in modern day Asia. He also very much admired Lincoln, quote, the world has been greatly benefited by the development of America as an industrial and commercial nation. So he developed China with her 400 million.

27:38 of population will be another new world in the economic sense. The nations will take part in this development, will reap immense advantages. Furthermore, international cooperation of this kind cannot but help to strengthen the brotherhood of man. So now you have Germany, Japan, China all on board working towards an industrialized, harmonious,

28:08 international community. And you have a bunch of whiny ass crybabies that are imperialist that are pissed off. That's the end of the 1800s in a nutshell. So it's also worthwhile to note that during this period of heavy, so she provides a list, which is a very interesting list, that all of this brotherly love and everybody getting along was very distasteful to some people.

28:43 So you have President Abraham Lincoln assassinated. Tsar Alexander II assassinated. President Garfield assassinated. Otto von Bismarck was couped in 1890. President of France assassinated in 1894. Tsar Alexander III was poisoned in 1894. President Kinley was assassinated in...

29:13 1901, a Russian minister of interior was assassinated. Grand Duke Sergei Alexandrov of Russia assassinated, 1905. Russia's minister of interior, the next one, assassinated. Tsar Nicholas II assassinated. And Sun Yat-sen was forced to step down after less than a year of being the president of China. He was a great influence way before that.

29:44 But in 1912, he was forced to step down, a soft coup. So out all the brotherly love in with what we're going to see revolution after revolution, monarchies that had been in existence for over a thousand years, hoisted out. And not that that's necessarily all bad from this perspective, but keep in mind.

30:14 the way the monarchists, a lot of them were very, other than a few, were very naturalistic. And so that was especially true in Russia. They very much, whether you like the way they treated their citizens or not, and you can make an argument that they weren't the most benevolent, but they did, there are cultures of people that want a strong leader.

30:43 We happen to be much more independent over here, although we love Donald Trump. But there are cultures that gravitate to that. And having a monarchy that has the best interest of their culture and their country is not a bad thing. We just have to keep that in mind. But one way to make sure that you destroy a culture that has had a king for the last thousand years is to get rid of the king. It's just that simple.

31:13 And fascists have to destroy culture. So that's part of the marching orders here. But the author also points out that virtually zero assassinations happened in Britain. Spencer Percival, who was in the late 1700s, was the only British prime minister to have been assassinated in British history.

31:45 While the U.S. would have three from 1865 to 1901. So you can kind of see what's going on here. So we now have the purge of all the American system supporters. So what's going to happen? Well, obviously, we're going to start destroying the American system. So the guy that worked with Abraham Lincoln, Henry Carey, wrote it.

32:20 an article called Harmony of Interest. And here's what he had to say. Two systems are before the world. The one looks to increasingly the proportion of persons and of capital arranged to trade and transportation, and therefore to diminishing the proportion engaged in producing commodities with which to trade, with necessarily diminishing the return to the labor of all.

32:48 while the other looks to increasing the proportion engaged in the work of production and diminishing that engaged in trade and transportation. So he's basically outlining, and I posted this, one looks to paparism, ignorance, depopulation, and barbarism, and the other one looks to increasing wealth, comfort, intelligence, and the combination of all actions and civilization.

33:17 One looks towards universal war while the other one looks towards universal peace. And that basically in a nutshell is what they shut down because everything that empowers the people and creates the industrial might where people can have good jobs and you are actually in the act of producing, you have pride in what you're doing, that all has to be shut down because what they want is slave labor.

33:51 The author gives the analogy of the difference between what happened in Rome and basically recreating that they learned their lesson. They got rid of the king only to bring back the king. And that's kind of basically what she's given the analogy of what happened here. We fought a revolution to get rid of a king. And we basically have been.

34:21 have allowed the manipulation to be subservient to England again. The world wars were fought to divide the partnership that were forming between the system of empires. Germany and the U.S. were pitted against one another in both world wars. Japan was pitted against the United States, where they had formerly worked with us. The economies of Germany and Japan was greatly set back because, as you know,

34:50 A lot of their industrial capabilities was bombed and their sovereignty was nil and void because we basically went over there and camped out there and never came home. Germany and Japan had no choice but to enforce the will of the newly established Anglo-American Empire. Russia and China were all that was left. And we know then that the industrialists, the same international syndicate, went into Russia.

35:20 with Bolsheviks to destroy Russia and that these same people, because we all know, where did the Sassoon family come that squatted in China forever? We all know where they came from. And so they basically did to China what they did to Russia. So you have to then wonder, who's really in charge of the Communist Party? Is it really the...

35:52 Because we know the Communist Party got kicked out of the Soviet Union and it dissolved. So we have a prototype and we know it can be done. So a lot of people, and I thought this was true too, that Churchill had talked about the Iron Curtain in a speech in March 5th, 1946, declaring the Soviet Union and the China were our new enemies to the free world.

36:23 That actually didn't originally come from him. Bertrand Russell, a member of the Fabian Society and a strategist for the fascist in Britain, wrote a book or article called The Bomb and Civilization, calling for one world government. And I'm going to quote him. Either war or civilization must end, and if it is to be war that ends,

36:54 There must be an international authority with the sole power to make new bombs. But I fear that that is utopian. If America was more imperialistic, there would be another possibility. And they're going to make that happen. If America were, if they were more imperialistic, there would be another possibility, less utopian and less desirable.

37:24 but still preferable to obliteration of civilized. It is possible for Americans to use their position of superiority to insist upon disarmament, not only in Germany and Japan, but everywhere except the U.S., or at any rate in every country not prepared to enter into a close military alliance with the United States. During the next few years, this policy should be enforced.

37:54 If one or two wars were necessary, they would be brief and would be soon end in a decisive American victory. This is immediately after World War II. In this way, a new League of Nations could be formed, i.e. the UN, under American leadership, which is why it's here, and the peace of the world would be securely established. But I fear that respect for...

38:23 international justice would stop Washington from adopting this policy. That's frightening. There is only one way in which great wars can be permanently prevented, and that is the establishment of an international government. There will be one other method by which, in theory, the peace of the world could be secured, and that is the supremacy of one nation or one closely allied group of nations.

38:55 And that's why they're trying to group people together so they can have this council sitting on top of it, controlling everything. America at this moment, if it were bellicose and imperialistic, could compel the rest of the world to disarm and establish a worldwide monopoly of American armed forces. But the country has no wish for such enterprises. The opportunity will be gone in the near future, a world war.

39:25 however terrible, would probably end in America's victory. And I mean, he just goes on to say that they want one world government. They want America to be the military. And interestingly enough, they basically did that under NATO. Incredibly, in the year 1946, a little over a year after the end of World War II, Russell was calling for another war, basically to end all wars. And in it,

39:55 what he wanted to do basically is to stop Russia from getting the nuclear weapon. But we all know from reading other books that between World War I and World War II, the Soviet Union and Germany had a secret pact that didn't come out right away in which Germany began rebuilding all of their arms production capability in Russia. So while we thought we were...

40:23 ferreting away all of the nuclear scientists and scientists in general into the United States, those people had already all worked in Russia. The factories were left in Russia. They built factories from the end of World War I to the end of World War II. And so this is all very interesting. And he may not the...

40:48 Bertrand guy may not have known that at the time because it was a secret pact between Germany and Russia. So there was the Soviets. There was not ever any question that the Soviet Union was going to have nuclear weapons. So the author also notes that there's been today a lot of effort to whitewash Bertrand Russell's call for a unilateral.

41:18 one new world order um and then basically she goes into it on to explain why he wanted it to prevent russia from getting the um bomb so it one of the things that um russell talks about is basically going in um she makes note that no nation

41:53 was going to be considered sovereign. No people of a nation had the right to decide the future course for their country under this and that the U.S. was going to be a puppet of the British Empire and the international government. They would decide the fate of all countries and it would not benefit the citizens, but it would benefit the elite governing class. It's basically calling for a fascist totalitarian system.

42:26 via the UN, a kind of one world dictatorship, world federalist utopias. I don't consider that a utopia. But in essence, what we've been learning about the Gladio network, that's exactly what they were setting up. They were going into all of these democracies with functioning elections. They were jerry-rigging the elections. And if the wrong guy won, they'd assassinate him.

42:54 They created the stay behind units to create instability, to push people the way they wanted to vote or the way they wanted to. They captured all the media so that they could brainwash the citizens of these countries. So the CIA and all the other intels, the BND of Germany, the MI6 of England, Mossad of Israel, were all.

43:22 So this has been an ongoing operation. What we're trying to do is set the premise of where it started. And it's also not coincidental that in 1947, for the first time ever, of course, right after World War II stopped, the United States had a standing army. We had never had a standing army. You had a cadre of senior people.

43:52 that were like the backbone of a war department that were there through the draft system to mobilize and train people to go to war. And it was supposed to be a laborious process so that cooler heads could prevail. Having a standing army means that you will always be at war. And of course, at the same time, the CIA was created.

44:22 who's going to instigate the use of that standing army all the time. And at the same time, we have over in Germany, the creation in 1942 and the transferring to in 1947, 45 to 47, the operational control of the stay behind units under the auspices of the CIA and the global intel network that was set up. So you have all of the.

44:48 put together at the end of 1947, where 50 years prior to that, at the end of the 1800s, you basically had a global peace breaking out with the Industrial Revolution and everybody sharing until they killed everybody. So the author then goes over a bunch of national security directives that basically were written in the 1950-ish timeframe.

45:22 that basically puts us at war with the Soviets. January 1950, one titled The Implications of Soviet Possession of Atomic Weapons, that we could actually launch a preemptive strike. There was another one written about that. Also talking about

45:50 Let's see, 1954, one was written that talked about we're at the year of maximum danger. So you can just see the evolution of these National Security Council, which is who controls the CIA. They're building up the justification of, you know, red man bad instead of orange man bad, meaning the Soviet Union.

46:13 and painting the picture that's going to justify their long-term CIA operations and the standing military always being at war. Also in 1954, NSC-75 was written, a report to the NSC by the Executive Secretary on British military commitment. The report concluded that if the British Empire collapsed and Britain could no longer carry out

46:43 deployments in defending the free world against the Soviets, the U.S. would not be able to carry out its current foreign policy. It was thus concluded in the report that it would be more cost effective to aid Britain in saving Europe. So they are creating the foundation to make America subservient to the British Empire again.

47:09 The U.S. had gone from an explicit mission to end imperialism worldwide under Roosevelt. I'm going to doubt that, but to actively supporting and upholding the British colonies and vassal states under Truman. And I would say that the policy to uphold American or to end imperialism happened with Lincoln in that area, not with Roosevelt. But I differ with the author on that point.

47:40 So basically, we're handing our sovereignty back and tying it into Europe, mainly Britain. Much of the world had understood World War II to be about sovereignty of nation states against the tyranny of fascism and the empires. After all, the imperialists and fascists were often found linked hand in hand, as seen by Edward VIII.

48:09 And they talk about the lumping of the Vichy government in France, the King of Italy, Mussolini, and Imperial Japan. The imperialists and fascists in discussion with each other as to what form the post-World War would look in their individual areas. It's for this reason that countries were chosen to oversee

48:39 World War II grand strategy would be the U.S., Britain, France, Germany, and Japan. So it's saying that the very countries that, other than the U.S., which we've now acquiesced to in the early 50s, the very countries that were the fascists, if you go back to last chapter, they are now the leading figures in all of these sectioning off of places, right?

49:09 So Germany is going to lead pan Europe. They transition to fascism. British imperialism is going to lead one. We made the argument last chapter, they're fascist. The Japan had basically transitioned to fascism. They're going to lead the one over in Asia and America having assumed themselves to the English.

49:36 with the UN and everything else and being part of NATO, they're now going to lead the Pan-American one. So basically, they've set up exactly what they wanted to set up, just not in something that we recognized was happening at the time. So Ho Chi Minh had fought against the Japanese fascists during World War II.

50:09 On behalf of the allies, he signed a proclamation of independence for the country of Vietnam. And in it, it says, quote, we hold truths that all men are created equal, that they were endowed by their creator. He basically copied us. It goes on to say that.

50:38 understood in the broader sense this means all people on earth are born equal every person has the right to live in happy and free so i i obviously found that interesting um because he also said goes on to say yet during the throughout the last 80 years the french imperialist abusing the principles of freedom equality and fraternity

51:08 have violated the integrity of our ancestral land and oppressed our countrymen. Their deeds run counter to the ideals of humanity and justice. A people who have courageously opposed French domination for more than 80 years, a people who have fought side by side with the allies against the fascists during those last years, such a people must be free and independent. And so then what did we do when they finally kicked the French out? We went in. And why did we go in? We went in.

51:39 Because we wanted the opium. We went in to further the imperialistic nature of what this one world government. You can't have people being independent and calling the shots. And for those of you who don't know, Ho Chi Minh was like a national icon. I mean, he definitely, whether you like him or not.

52:11 He was definitely an icon in the Vietnamese culture. I'd also mention at this point, which we've mentioned periodically, this is also true with Algeria. Algeria was a French colony that France had been in for a very long time. And they constantly was trying, they were constantly trying to, wow, the images that came up. Oh my gosh. I'm sorry.

52:42 I got distracted. So Unicorn did a search on poppy pin badge. And wow, the images that came up, a lot of UK and other military and Masonic implications. There you go. Symbolism will be their downfall. So you need to if you're on true social, you need to post that and then tag me in it so we can get that out. That's astounding. Great job. OK, so.

53:10 We just see the same thing repeated over and over again. So this next quote that I want to share with you is more from a draft memorandum from Secretary of Defense McNamara to Johnson. It says, this understanding of a straightforward security threat is interwoven with another perception, namely that we have our view.

53:42 of the way the U.S. should be moving and of the need for the majority of the rest of the world to be moving in the same direction if we are to achieve our national objective. The role we have inherited and have chosen for ourselves for the future is to extend our influence and power to thwart ideologies that are hostile to these aims. Notice he doesn't say communism. It's anything that's hostile to the U.S., i.e. the Brits.

54:12 aims, and to move the world as best we can in the direction we prefer. Our ends cannot be achieved and our leadership role cannot be played if some powerful and virulent nation, whether Germany, Japan, Russia, or China, is allowed to organize their part of the world according to a philosophy that's counter to ours. That could have been written by Bertrand Russell.

54:43 That could have been written by Soros. That could have been written by Klaus Schwab. So this had nothing to do with the fight against communism. Any country that is, quote, allowed to organize their part of the world according to a philosophy contrary to ours, unquote, is fair game in this new century of warfare. Russell is quoted as saying, we'll have to be bound by its constitution to intervene.

55:19 Talking about us, the U.S. Bound by its constitution to intervene by force of arms against any nation that refuses to submit to arbitration, unquote. All in the name of democracy. So the British sets up, to further this, a Southeast Asian Asia command, which basically is their attempt to save all of their Asian...

55:54 colonies and we are now part of that and have been for a long time what i found interesting about this is we all know who the mount battens are they were a bunch of pedophiles so you have the british southeast asia command headquartered in what is now sirlanka and admiral lewis mountbatten was in command of

56:25 Churchill's policy, but he had to initially share that command with MacArthur. The British got control of their previous colonies, Burma, which is now Miramar, and Malaya, which is now Malaysia, as well as Thailand, Singapore, and Sumatra, but they were not satisfied and continued depression.

56:53 pressure the United States to allow British priority in liberating the entire region. They didn't want MacArthur anywhere near there. The U.S. logic in agreeing to the establishment of the Southeast Asia Command was that Britain would take a larger role in defeating the Japanese fascist in Burma, thus opening up a southern route to resupply to China to aid in the fight against the Japanese fascist.

57:21 In 1944, which is still inside of World War II, Mountbatten had successfully sabotaged this effort. So it goes on to describe the fact that he worked with the chief people that were in charge of the intelligence to thwart. Let me just read this part. A major.

57:47 The guy that was the major player in the opium trade that was enforced on China against its will culminated in China's loss of two opium wars against Britain. So that same guy is in charge of the intel during World War II as it relates to the Asian theater. General Wedemeyer from the U.S. Army served in Asia during World War II recognized that one of the major reasons why the Chinese communists were...

58:18 Unable to form an alliance against Japanese was due to the British sabotage by Mountbatten. The British were playing the same old imperial game of flaring up bad blood that had already developed between the two groups in a divide and conquer strategy. The Chinese communists did recognize that this would ultimately lead to the balkanization of China if the union of China against the Japanese imperialists was not.

58:47 put forward as the number one priority. So we have General Wademeyer who says, quote, we Americans interpret U.S. policy as requiring a strong unified China and a China fighting effectively against Japanese. There is considerable evidence that the British policy is not cognizant with the U.S. policy. British ambassador personally suggested to me that a

59:17 Strong, unified China would be dangerous to the world and certainly would jeopardize the white man's position immediately in the Far East and ultimately throughout the world. Let that sink in for just a second. Right. They're like the most racist entity alive. It's just it's mind boggling, actually. So I mean, I've already read this and every time I read it, it makes me more mad.

1:00:00 Here's another quote from the London Daily Mail. Quote, anti-British psychology has not been discouraged by our American ally. U.S. propagandist has been working in the Chinese area. A great plan to damn the Yancey, known as the Yancey Valley Authority. It will be a great engineering contract of modern times.

1:00:31 So, in other words, the British were already identifying the threat over 70 years ago of an independent China who would have already had her sights on great industrial projects such as the Yancey Dam, which is now the Three Gorge Dam, and the construction of the old Silk Road, which of course was with Britain dominating it, under the Silk and Road Initiative.

1:01:02 So as long as Britain was in charge of all that crap, everything was great. But if a country is to do it on their own, not tolerate it at all. That just like blows my mind. It's okay if it gets done. They just have to benefit from it. A sovereign country cannot benefit from their own projects. So Anglo-American foreign policy regards the...

1:01:36 Belt and Road Initiative as a threat to the Western world. And that's our policy now because we've adopted everything that the British Empire wanted us. We're like parrots now. And I'm not saying whether it's good or not. What I'm trying to get through to everybody is to understand these are not our thoughts. They're not our policies. These policies were created in the late 1800s, early 1900s.

1:02:07 And they've been force fed to everybody from an elitist group of people at the round table. And as we described before, you've got the round table circle that runs everything. And then they have circle upon circle upon circle that goes out from that circle, like the CFR, the RIIA in Britain, the Committee of 300. Yeah, we could name all of them. But there's a crap load of them.

1:02:43 The high ranking individuals and institutions like the CFR have gone so far as to call the Belt and Road Initiative a threat to American national security. Well, they have to because that's how they mobilize the military support for it and get NATO involved in it. The Mekong River Basin Survey modeled after the Tennessee Valley Authority were set back for decades because that's what they used the campaign in Vietnam was to destroy their infrastructure.

1:03:13 They destroyed the canal systems there, which greatly reduced everybody's standard of living there because they want us as slaves. It is envisioned that such a canal in Thailand and in Vietnam would improve transportation to their region, similar to the Panama Canal and the Suez Canal. And who was in charge of those?

1:03:45 The Panama Canal was owned by America. So as long as it benefits America, it's fine. And the Suez Canal was, Britain was in charge of it. So as long as they benefited, it was fine. This exposes the true intentions of the Cold War doctrine, which continues to this day. The threat was never really considered communism, but rather the cause of nationalism and to thwart nationalism, industrialization,

1:04:20 and the liberation of people. That's what all of this has been about. That had to be stopped if you're going to subjugate the world to an elitist one world order. So remarks by General Stilwell and General Wademeyer that we just went over showcase how American foreign policy was hijacked by Britain's foreign policy. So here is General, let's see.

1:04:58 Oh, I want to quote here. This guy is the Marquis Lord Salisbury from Britain. The genuine conviction of the U.S. delegation that the unity and strength of colonial empires, not only that of Britain, is essential to world security is a very healthy development in the U.S. opinion. So that was...

1:05:32 given those remarks were given in the un as basically confirmation that they had subjugated the u.s to the british way of thinking um so again here they used um the threat of communism we know is how they justified going into vietnam because we had to stop communism um and that was basically the creation of big boogeyman

1:06:06 People such as Sarkano, then president of Indonesia, overnight went from being criticized as an abider to Japanese fascism to instead being a communist sympathizer. So again, it had nothing to do with communism. And it's to demonize anybody that won't go along with your ideas. The reason why so many nationalist leaders were open to working with the communists

1:06:37 was because the communists were also for nationalism and against imperialism. So nothing came close to the level of destruction that was occurring on a military and economic level from Western imperialism. And that was true through the whole war mechanism. The Cold War was used to destroy Korea, Vietnam.

1:07:09 Everything. So these nations recognize that the choice between Western imperialism and Soviet communism was an artificial construct and that there existed a clear third option. This third option was the authentic Americanism system of economics that had been opposed to systems of imperialism. So in an interesting twist, because I love the book The Third Way.

1:07:41 That is exactly what Donald Trump embraced. That sentence right there, because we have had this false construct between imperialism subjugated by Britain and the communism. And Donald Trump, by getting on board of the nationalistic care about your own country, opted for a third way, almost juxtaposed, because let me set this up.

1:08:11 So in the third way, they talked about creating communism and Nazism in order for their third way to be fascism. So everybody was going to hate communism because it's so brutal and kills millions. Everybody's going to hate Nazism because it's so brutal and kills millions. So they were going to use the fascists as we're going to create safety for you and have a totalitarian fascist new world order.

1:08:39 Donald Trump turned that on them as he's so brilliant in doing and saying that is, in fact, a false construct. Communism versus imperialism. I'm going to call that fascism. And the third way really is going back to the basics of Americanism, which is the best thing. And it starts with every country caring about their country first. And that's why they hate him.

1:09:10 And I think as we go along, all of these things that we see being exposed, we can see by going back in history, because somebody obviously has done all this work. That's why I want y'all to have it. Somebody did all of this in prepping Donald Trump for picking the right middle ground. I'm just trying to share it with all of you. Because it is so clear to me with every book I read that he knows all of this. And he has thwarted all of this.

1:09:40 And if he hasn't completely got it stymied yet, he is working on it. So that gets us done. Yeah, we've been here an hour. So I'm going to go ahead and stop at this point. That was chapter three. Chapter four talks about the fascist roots of the CIA and the true origin of the Cold War, because I kind of hinted about that, that it really didn't come from Churchill. And we will tomorrow talk about what its true nature was.

1:10:09 What I am going to try to do is combine, because it's a real natural fit, between Chapter 4 and Chapter 5, because Chapter 5 is very interesting in its applicability today. Chapter 5 talks about how the Ukrainian nationalist movement post-World War II was bought and paid for by the CIA. And you're going to see the direct connections.

1:10:38 of everything we're going to talk about tomorrow on the foundation of the national movement in Ukraine and Nazism. So it's a very, I was just tickled to death to actually put all the pieces together. So we're going to do four and five. It'll be a longer one for tomorrow, but we're definitely going to get four and five done tomorrow because they kind of go together. So let me see. Elementary school textbooks are filled with life.

1:11:07 Elementary, honey, all of them. Let me go back to your comments because I want to make sure that I get them all. True golden years. Yep, I agree. I agree, Bridget, that Russia has decided not to play ball. And it's funny that you use that analogy because that's kind of the ball that was handed to Trump, that they're playing ball with Trump. They're not playing ball with the old world order.

1:11:40 And I very much believe that. I think you're dead on true. And that's what I would tell you. I had a deep sigh going through all of this. But my outlook, the more I read and the more enraged I get at the past, the more excited I get about the future. Because all of this, you can see solutions to it.

1:12:12 in not only the things that Donald Trump did, but in the things that Donald Trump is saying and what he's going to do. So I'm very excited about the future. I do believe that. And when I say that there's a plan, I know a lot of people are Q fans. I definitely believe Q is a thing. And I think people misinterpreted.

1:12:41 what the plan is um as far as everybody else being in control of it and it just rolling out we very much are the plan um donald trump very much knew what their plan was um and it's clear that he is doing everything in his power meticulously step by step to unravel it and um at

1:13:08 some point and i hope we're there to help so share this um podcast um follow me on here give us a thumbs up so this word gets out um i increasingly see there's a guy on twitter by the name of joe lange l-a-n-g-e um i reached out to him he's talking about all of the drug um

1:13:34 activities that was happening in south america and the money laundering and stuff but not one time did he mention the stay behind the gladio he doesn't understand that um all of that has an underlying infrastructure and so we have to get the word out um and um us knowing more about it so that we can get on to social media and understand the history and use references

1:14:01 I think is going to change everything. So anyway, thank you for being here. I will talk to you tomorrow.

Entities here

Claims made here

British Empire supported Confederate States host_asserted ▶ 7:43

“They were genuinely an empire, as were most of the European countries. They all had colonies in Africa, which we said last time they viewed strictly as slave colonies. Every African country was a plan…”

Tsar Alexander II deployed Russian Empire host_asserted ▶ 8:15

“Tsar Alexander II ended up deploying the Russian Navy to both the Pacific and the Atlantic shores. And he did that after a meeting. Let me read you. It says Tsar Alexander explained in an interview wh…”

Tsar Alexander II viewed_as_casus_belli Confederate States book_quoted ▶ 8:46

“In the autumn of 1862, the government of France and Great Britain proposed to Russia in a formal but not official way, the joint recognition of European powers of the independence of the Confederate S…”

France proposed Confederate States book_quoted ▶ 8:46

British Empire proposed Confederate States book_quoted ▶ 8:46

Tsar Alexander II sent_to New York City book_quoted ▶ 9:16

“as a Casa Bali for Russia. And in order that the governments of France and Great Britain may understand that this is no idle threat, I will send the Pacific fleet to San Francisco and the Atlantic fle…”

Tsar Alexander II sent_to San Francisco book_quoted ▶ 9:16

Lord Salisbury viewed_as_rivals United States book_quoted ▶ 10:45

“with Britain's slave-based economic policy. In stark contrast to this sentiment, Lord Salisbury, who we know as Lord Robert Cecil, who served three times as Prime Minister of Britain between 1885 and …”

Lord Salisbury viewed_as_compatible Confederate States book_quoted ▶ 11:17

“rivals commercially. With the southern states, the case is entirely reversed. The population of the agricultural people, they furnish the raw materials for our industry and they consume our products. …”

Indiana exported_to United States host_asserted ▶ 13:26

“drugs, opium, they weren't necessarily bringing things good for America. Because if you follow the trade route, a lot of the manufacturing of the cotton products happened in India, not because again, …”

United States exported_to Indiana host_asserted ▶ 13:26

Otto von Bismarck implemented Germany host_asserted ▶ 14:25

“that none of the countries that we view as enemies of America were actually ever enemies of America. But you have a lot of reason why these powers to be, if you will, like Britain, would despise Russi…”

Berlin-Baghdad Railway completed_in Baghdad host_asserted ▶ 18:51

“Otto von Bismarck was heavily organizing for the building of the Berlin to Baghdad railroad. That railroad, unfortunately, did not get completed until 1940 because they ran into all kinds of obstructi…”

Otto von Bismarck organized_for Berlin-Baghdad Railway host_asserted ▶ 18:51

League of Nations advocated_for Europe host_asserted ▶ 23:42

“The League of Nations proposition of the U.S. of Europe was to effectively look at every nation in Europe as a colony within an overarching empire. And so what we talked about last time is they had a …”

Japan worked_with United States host_asserted ▶ 25:39

“In 1869, the Japanese modernizers worked directly with Lincoln slash Kerry strategists to basically create an industrialized Japan at the same time that Germany was kind of mimicking what we were doin…”

Sun Yat-sen founded China host_asserted ▶ 26:07

“There was a guy by the name of Sun Yat-sen, Y-A-T-S-E-N. Yat-sen? That's what we're going to call him. And he basically gave birth to modern China. He was the first president of the Republic of China …”

Sun Yat-sen led_revolution_against Ming dynasty host_asserted ▶ 26:38

“led China's revolution to free itself from the corruption of the Qing Dynasty. Again, y'all know if you've been here for a little bit, though the names of these things are interesting to say the least…”

Sun Yat-sen organized_with United States host_asserted ▶ 27:06

“where he organized with American patriots of the school of Abraham Lincoln and Henry C. Carey. Sue Yatzen is considered one of the greatest leaders in modern day Asia. He also very much admired Lincol…”

Henry Carr wrote Harmony of Interest host_asserted ▶ 31:45

“While the U.S. would have three from 1865 to 1901. So you can kind of see what's going on here. So we now have the purge of all the American system supporters. So what's going to happen? Well, obvious…”

Japan pitted_against United States host_asserted ▶ 34:21

“have allowed the manipulation to be subservient to England again. The world wars were fought to divide the partnership that were forming between the system of empires. Germany and the U.S. were pitted…”

Germany pitted_against United States host_asserted ▶ 34:21

Bolsheviks destroyed Russian Empire host_asserted ▶ 34:50

“A lot of their industrial capabilities was bombed and their sovereignty was nil and void because we basically went over there and camped out there and never came home. Germany and Japan had no choice …”

Sassoon Family squatted_in China host_asserted ▶ 35:20

“with Bolsheviks to destroy Russia and that these same people, because we all know, where did the Sassoon family come that squatted in China forever? We all know where they came from. And so they basic…”

Winston Churchill ordered_assassination_of Soviet Union host_asserted ▶ 35:52

“Because we know the Communist Party got kicked out of the Soviet Union and it dissolved. So we have a prototype and we know it can be done. So a lot of people, and I thought this was true too, that Ch…”

Bertrand Russell proposed The Bomb and Civilization host_asserted ▶ 36:23

“That actually didn't originally come from him. Bertrand Russell, a member of the Fabian Society and a strategist for the fascist in Britain, wrote a book or article called The Bomb and Civilization, c…”

Bertrand Russell member_of Fabian Society host_asserted ▶ 36:23

Bertrand Russell proposed United Nations book_quoted ▶ 37:54

“If one or two wars were necessary, they would be brief and would be soon end in a decisive American victory. This is immediately after World War II. In this way, a new League of Nations could be forme…”

Soviet Union did_business_with Germany host_asserted ▶ 39:55

“what he wanted to do basically is to stop Russia from getting the nuclear weapon. But we all know from reading other books that between World War I and World War II, the Soviet Union and Germany had a…”

United States funded Operation Gladio host_asserted ▶ 44:22

“who's going to instigate the use of that standing army all the time. And at the same time, we have over in Germany, the creation in 1942 and the transferring to in 1947, 45 to 47, the operational cont…”

Ho Chi Minh carried_out_attack Japan host_asserted ▶ 49:36

“with the UN and everything else and being part of NATO, they're now going to lead the Pan-American one. So basically, they've set up exactly what they wanted to set up, just not in something that we r…”

Ho Chi Minh proposed Vietnam host_asserted ▶ 50:09

“On behalf of the allies, he signed a proclamation of independence for the country of Vietnam. And in it, it says, quote, we hold truths that all men are created equal, that they were endowed by their …”

France operated_in Algeria host_asserted ▶ 52:11

“He was definitely an icon in the Vietnamese culture. I'd also mention at this point, which we've mentioned periodically, this is also true with Algeria. Algeria was a French colony that France had bee…”

Robert McNamara proposed United States book_quoted ▶ 53:42

“of the way the U.S. should be moving and of the need for the majority of the rest of the world to be moving in the same direction if we are to achieve our national objective. The role we have inherite…”

Louis Mountbatten headed Southeast Asia host_asserted ▶ 55:54

“colonies and we are now part of that and have been for a long time what i found interesting about this is we all know who the mount battens are they were a bunch of pedophiles so you have the british …”

Albert Wedemeyer spied_on Louis Mountbatten book_quoted ▶ 57:47

“The guy that was the major player in the opium trade that was enforced on China against its will culminated in China's loss of two opium wars against Britain. So that same guy is in charge of the inte…”

Louis Mountbatten carried_out_attack China book_quoted ▶ 58:18

“Unable to form an alliance against Japanese was due to the British sabotage by Mountbatten. The British were playing the same old imperial game of flaring up bad blood that had already developed betwe…”

United States funded Ukraine host_asserted ▶ 1:10:09

“What I am going to try to do is combine, because it's a real natural fit, between Chapter 4 and Chapter 5, because Chapter 5 is very interesting in its applicability today. Chapter 5 talks about how t…”