he Colonel's Corner The Great Pretense Part 4

auto-scroll word highlight ▶ Rumble @ here

Transcript

0:00 I don't know what's going on with my video. It's not playing right. But we're going to go ahead and start. All right. So. On delay. Yeah. All right. Got to get my hat on here. All right. I got pool hair today. We're on part three, which is.

0:35 basically page um 67 and um we're going into chapter nine all right so this this Fabian Society thing is kicking my butt I just have to be honest with you guys I'm it's so funny that all of this research that we've done just like falls in on itself the more you read um like I was just

1:08 researching a whole bunch of different organizations that I'd never heard of. And you find a whole crap ton of skull and bones in these organizations. The Colombian president, it's just, it's crazy. It's literally, I can't wait.

1:32 till this Friday when we start the whole Fabian deep dive, because it's going to knock your socks off when you see how deeply rooted it is here. And I think what we're going to find is that the permeations of it is right in front of our face today. It just is.

2:02 It's mind boggling because you start seeing immediately the patterns of the infiltration of the university systems, just like what, so the book that I'm reading about this and doing all of the side research shows the permeations in South Africa, in India.

2:29 in the UK, basically the entire British Empire, Australia, New Zealand. And then it obviously comes over to the United States. And through all of the same things that we've talked about for a long time, the Pilgrim Society, the CFR, and it just starts tying into all of them. It's crazy.

2:58 And yes, somebody sent a meme that there's Fabians, you see Fabians everywhere. Again, once you see the pattern, you will recognize just how deeply embedded they are and it will all start to make sense. Okay, just like we can readily recognize now when they're pulling a false flag on us, you'll be able to...

3:28 I'm really excited about it, if you can't tell. Okay, part three is called Turf War. And it starts out in August of 2009 in Washington, D.C. in a federal court where it was revealed that State Department Special Agent Paul Forster, then suffering from severe...

3:57 health problems was slated at some future date to testify for DEA agent Richard Horn in a long-pending illegal eavesdropping lawsuit. Horn's civil litigation implicated a CIA station chief and a State Department official. In the court pleadings that was filed by Horn's attorney Brian Layton,

4:25 It basically provided an overview of what Forster would say under oath at his deposition. It hinted at additional information damaging to the government. This is a quote from the pleadings. The Horn matter was jointly investigated by Supervisory Special Agent of the U.S. State Department, Paul Forster, and CIA IG investigator, Michael.

4:56 Grebsky. Throughout the investigation, Mr. Forster had numerous conversations with DEA agent Horn, who at all times had a security clearance and was employed by the DEA. In order to learn more details and specifics from Horn and to field new information that Horn, from time to time, would provide based upon Horn's independent conversation with others who had knowledge of the events arising out of

5:26 Burma, Forster knows that his handwritten authorization of the report was forged by another person who was then employed by the Department of State's IG office. Forster knows with certainty the identity of the person who committed the forgery. Forster also, based on

5:51 upon his conversation with others in a position to know that the Department of State IG report was classified in order to prevent Horn, his counsel, the media, and the U.S. Congress from gaining access to it.

6:07 Forster also knows from his earlier conversations with Mike Grybski, his counterpart at the CIA, that the CIA intended to use the classification of documents as the centerpiece of its tactics to fend off Horn's allegations. The agency intended to prevent Horn and his counsel from gaining access to the documents that would prove their case.

6:34 While the gist of Forster's information is stated in this pleading, he knows of much more additional information that if deposed, it would be information to which he would testify. But it is additional information that has been disclosed herein because it has not been disclosed herein because of the classification designation of national security issues. That was written.

7:04 by his attorney. Then chapter nine starts going in. That's the overview. Former DEA agent Richard Horn fought the U.S. government in court for years trying to prove the CIA illegally spied on him as part of an effort to thwart his anti-narcotics mission in Southeast Asia, Burma. Huh, where have we heard that before? Of course, Burma is now called Miramar.

7:38 After being removed from his post, Horn filed litigation in federal court in 1994, accusing top officials within the CIA and State Department in Burma of violating his Fourth Amendment rights. The protection against unreasonable searches and seizure. After languishing in federal court for 10 years, Horn's case was dismissed by a judge in late 2004.

8:08 after crucial evidence in the case was suppressed on the grounds of national security. Because the entire court record has been sealed by the judge, no one would have ever known that Horn's case was torpedoed if it was not for the fact of anonymous leak to the author. Horn served in the early 1990s as the DEA country attache to Burma, which ranks as one of the top

8:40 opium poppy producing countries in the world, which of course we know because we've covered all of that because that's where the OSS initially moved Chiang Kai-shek to infect Burma. As the highest ranking in-country DEA representative in Burma, Horn was charged with overseeing the agency's mission in the country of eradicating opium. Oh, he must have been a really bad guy.

9:13 From the start, Horn ran into problems, both with the CIA and the State Department. The State Department's charge de l'affaire is Franklin Huddle Jr., and the CIA station chief in Burma at the time was Arthur Brown. Horn's attorney, Layton, describes that Horn was up against

9:39 what he was up against in Burma in a letter that he sent in 1997 to then U.S. Senator Richard Shelby of Alabama. In the letter, Layton claims Huddle and Brown were bent on portraying the State Law and Order Restoration Council, the oppressive military junta currently ruling Burma at the time, in the worst possible light.

10:10 Horn wrote to Shelby saying that he had made inroads in gaining the assistance of this horrible government in helping to eradicate the poppy. So what he's saying is the State Department and the CIA are saying how bad the Burmese government is.

10:38 While it's actually working with the DEA to eradicate opium. Just to be clear. Horn's success in getting rid of the opium had set a series in motion of overt and clandestine efforts on the part of Huddle and Brown to undermine him. Gosh, this seems so familiar. The reason Layton claimed in a phone interview.

11:10 was that if Horn's strategy was successful, it would undercut the State Department's vilification of the Burmese government. It would also undercut their ability to use that opium in their covert operations. CIA's motivation in the region were very complex, unless you know what we know. Horn found himself in the path of the CIA's buzzsaw.

11:42 Huddle managed to get Horn run out of Burma through the State Department. And his attorney contends, but only after Horn discovered the CIA had planted eavesdropping equipment in his private home in Burma. Horn's attorney claims the bug was planted by Brown or one of his operatives as part of an effort to set up Horn and to undermine his DEA mission.

12:12 The eavesdropping in the end failed to produce any dirt on Horn, but it did provide a clear violation of his rights. Sources within the DEA contend Horn's claims against the CIA are on target and were not unique. Some added that the DOJ went so far as to claim that no U.S. citizen is protected from eavesdropping by its own government when it's overseas. Just like...

12:42 You know, under the Obama administration, we were not protected by being droned either in the streets of a foreign government. So at least they're consistent. Horn's whole story, said one anonymous DEA agent, they spied on his home and the DOJ defended the CIA. Because of course they do. They always do.

13:11 Horn's attorney in his letter to Senator Shelby contends the CIA's net is much bigger than Burma and that they regularly spy on DEA agents everywhere. And we know that to be true because we've read it before. Quote, my client has learned that many DEA agents have been the subject of electronic eavesdropping by the State Department and the CIA. There are no doubts.

13:40 countless times when DEA operation plans have been foiled by the quote-unquote listeners without DEA ever even knowing it happened, unquote. What really happened in Horn's case is not supposed to have come out if the government had its way. From the start, Horn's litigation was sealed and critical evidence to support his claim suppressed.

14:09 Specifically, key pieces of evidence to federal IG reports that centered on Horn's accusations were determined by the court to be protected from disclosure based on something called state secrets privileges, i.e. national security. That privilege was established as part of a 1953 Supreme Court ruling in a Reynolds case. It allows the government to deep six information.

14:38 on a dime. Quote, having determined the state secrets privilege bars disclosure of IG reports in certain attachments, the case cannot continue and must be dismissed. Unquote. That was written by U.S. District Court Judge Royce Lamberth in July of 2004. Quote, as a result of the state secrets privilege, plaintiff cannot make a case.

15:07 Defendants cannot present facts necessary to their defense and the very subject matter at the heart of the case is protected from disclosure as a state secret, unquote. We have a mafia in charge of our government. So what are these terrible state secrets that must be protected? Well, we may never know the full picture given how Horn's case was swept under the rug and put under seal.

15:41 Even in sealed court rulings, that part of which was leaked to the author, all references to the alleged state secrets were redacted. So they don't even want you to know why they're doing it. In the sealed ruling, among the material redacted is the name of the station chief in Burma, who is one of the defendants in the lawsuit. So we already know his name. So why redact it?

16:12 Horn's attorney told me that he would be subject to criminal prosecution for disclosing the name. The name, Arthur Brown, has been published numerous times in media stories about the CIA's operation in Burma and is referenced in the letter sent to Senator Shelby. So it wasn't a state secret at all.

16:44 is as it appears on the surface. An examination of Horn's specific charges against Huddle and Brown offers insight. Horn's attorney claims Huddle and Brown used the resources of the State Department and the CIA to sabotage a DEA plan to gain the government of Burma's cooperation to reduce opium production.

17:08 Layton also claims that Huddle undermined Horn's efforts to provide Burma's prosecutors and police with U.S. assistance to implement its drug laws. Why? Well, we know why. In contrast, Layton pointed out in his letter to Senator Shelby, Mr. Huddle allowed the CIA to send Burmese military officers to Langley, Virginia to train with the CIA.

17:40 Gosh, where have we seen that before? Like literally everywhere. Horne also said that according to the allegation outlined in Judge Lambert's ruling, the CIA station chief, Brown compromised a DEA informant. Brown turned over a copy of a DEA document that included the name of a confidential DEA informant to certain persons in the Burmese government without the DEA's permission.

18:11 burned a source. Layton, in his 1997 letter to Senator Shelby, describes this event, quote, DEA's well-placed contact from the largest opium producing area in Burma provided DEA with a proposal to withdraw from opium production. The document was even signed by DEA's informant. If released, its contents would be highly inflammatory to the central government of Burma.

18:39 Brown chose to deliver a signed copy of this document, which he serendipitously obtained without Horn's permission or knowledge, to a ranking figure in the central government, knowing full well it jeopardized his life. It held the overall potential of causing the death of the informant, depreciating DEA's credibility with the government.

19:09 and derailing the entire project all at once. It seemed a near miracle that Brown's plan failed. Horn and his agents still managed, after much work, to convince the central government of Burma not to arrest the informant and give the crop substitution program a chance to succeed. That's literally crazy. Huddle was finally able, through the clout of the State Department, to get...

19:44 Horn reassigned out of Burma in September of 1993, a little more than a year after Horn had arrived. But about a month before his departure, Horn discovered that his house had been tampered with and that eavesdropping equipment had been installed. Quote, before leaving Burma, Horn happened to see a teletype which had quotes.

20:14 In a summary of a private telephone conversation Horn had from a telephone in his living room, this cable clearly demonstrated that the electronic intercept had been planted. As if that was not enough, Mr. Horn then learned about the technology used to conduct the intercept. My client learned from a friend in the intelligence community, now retired, who served with him in Burma, how the intercept was likely accomplished and where the transmitter and receiver

20:46 were likely located. Meanwhile, my client and I were threatened with prosecution if we told anyone the details of this technology designed specifically for use against other American diplomats. While at the same time, the government claimed it did not eavesdrop on my client, unquote. In addition to compromising the DEA informant in Burma, the alleged illegal monitoring of horns

21:17 private residence is also referenced in the judge's sealed ruling. In fact, the ruling states that they surfaced in the IG reports and that it had since been cloaked under state secret privileges. This is a statement, a quote from the ruling.

21:37 Quote, Horn's allegations regarding the handling of the DEA document was the subject of an IG report that the court determined on August 15, 2000, to be protected from disclosure by state secret privileges. Horn further argues that the purpose of the phone tap was to assist Huddle in obtaining information that would justify Huddle demanding Horn's removal from Burma or otherwise justify expelling him directly.

22:04 Horn alleges that Huddle sought his removal from Burma as retaliation for Horn sending reports to congressmen that conflicted with State Department reports prepared by Huddle. Horn supports his accusation of wiretapping with the contents of a cable sent by Huddle on or about August 13th, 1993 to his superiors in the State Department that contained allegedly verbatim quotations from the August 12th, 1993.

22:33 telephone conversation. The alleged phone tapping incident is the subject of a second IG report that the court determined on August 15, 2000 to be protected by the same state secrets privilege, unquote. To understand the context of this story, we have to explore a backstory to Burma in the early 1990s. The government entity that we mentioned

23:03 earlier, whose acronym is S-L-O-R-C, was a regime that had a bad civil rights record. It came into power through a military coup in 1988. The Junta was later reconstituted as a State Peace and Development Council, S-P-D-C.

23:28 During Horn's tour of duty, the ruling junta of Burma did not control various areas of the country because of financial and military limitations. This was true of the Golden Triangle region that borders Laos, Thailand, and China, which is exactly the place where the OSS and the CIA placed Chiang Kai-shek initially and the KMT army.

23:58 The narco trade of the Golden Triangle region is controlled by warlords who are able to field large armies funded by opium. Burma's military junta had struck bargains with these factions, such as the United Wa State Army, which had reached a ceasefire pact with the Burma's ruling regime in 1989.

24:26 The relationship between the powerful warlords who controlled the narco trade in Burma and the corrupt military junta that controls the government was complex. Sources in the intelligence community say the relationships was basically a symbiotic union, but it was not. Drug money often finds its way into the quote-unquote corrupt government, not the CIA.

24:59 Who's protecting it? But the corrupt government. The intelligence game in the region, according to sources, involved penetrating both worlds and using information gained to manipulate the politics and the forces in the region. The CIA would be inclined to have assets planted in both the government and the narco-trafficking. The CIA's official handling those human assets had built their careers on information and...

25:28 operate freely within this corrupt regime. If you want to cultivate assets in the drug trade to get information, then you have to basically allow the drug trade to continue, which is the story the CIA uses all the time. And there's never any mention that it is the CIA's control of these networks that allows them to continue and they even facilitate the transportation.

25:55 That always seems to get left out of the conversation. Former spy and FBI agent Locke Lau says that the Horn case is a perfect illustration of how there is no coordination between the intelligence community and DEA. Well, there is if you have a corrupt DEA agent too, but if you have a legitimate one, they will have nothing to do with them. Lau drew national attention in 2003 after revealing in a court pleading.

26:26 in a workplace discrimination lawsuit that he filed with the DOJ that he had spied on China in the late 80s and 90s for the FBI and the CIA. Although Lau is prohibited from discussing the specifics of his spy mission because of national security, his assignment did provide him with expertise to brief CIA agents on Chinese alien smuggling.

26:55 Like Horn, certain pleadings in Lau's employment discrimination case were later stricken and placed under seal. Lau went on to say that the U.S. government was really serious about, if they were really serious about eradicating the drug trade, they would have done it by now, but they don't really want to. Let's say the DEA was successful in eradicating all drug trafficking, Lau said. What would be left to prop up these pro-U.S. regimes that rely on drug trades?

27:27 not to mention the funding for the CIA's covert actions. The CIA can use the proceeds of the drug trade to pay for armies around the world, which we know in fact they do. Lau also says a lot of careers in the intelligence community has been built around human assets that have been planted within the ranks of the narco-trafficking organizations. If you take down the drug trade,

27:54 You take down the very assets whose careers depend on them. Former CIA spy manager Luttrell Osborne, who served during the Cold War, doesn't directly concede Loud's point about the CIA, but did tell the author in an interview, the U.S. adversaries have no qualms working with criminal organizations and neither does the CIA because they are one. Given this backdrop,

28:29 It doesn't take a lot to conclude that the intelligence community has a lot of motivation to keep the Horn case under wraps because the DEA agent actually wanted to do his job and take down the narco network in Burma. So he was expelled from the country. The directive is to do the foreign policy bidding.

28:58 In the region, and in the case of the CIA, it was to ensure that the drug trafficking continued, regardless of whether it placed people in danger. The use of state secret privileges in the Horn case is the government's nuclear option in all of these cases. So, that basically, well, I mean,

29:36 add this last little part. One DEA source summed up the danger of the government's continued expansion this way. Quote, illegal eavesdropping the centerpiece of Horn's civil case is also a criminal offense. An analogy of the government's position is this. If the CIA chief of station had stabbed Horn with a butcher knife in the American embassy, he could because location chief are considered classified and cannot be.

30:06 disclosed. Moreover, the station chief would not be able to defend himself without using classified information. Therefore, the state secret's privilege kicks in and the case disappears. This theoretical stretch of privilege is not unlike what has been done in Horn's civil action. In practice, both cases could move forward, but only if fair treatment is accorded by the court.

30:33 It is apparent that the state secret's privilege was expanded and evolved in such a way that it effectively immunizes persons and agencies of crimes and other misconduct. It no longer just protects troop movements, satellite images. It now seems to include every single thing the intelligence agencies do. The intelligence agencies are no longer held accountable for wrongdoing. They have an all-inclusive.

31:03 Trump card, in the Horn case, the state secret's privilege has been used to immunize people and agencies from wrongdoing, which is a far cry from what the U.S. Constitution intended. Unquote. The U.S. Constitution didn't intend for us to have a central intelligence agencies that goes around killing people. Just saying. Moving on, chapter 10, Horn's dilemma.

31:30 Former DEA agent Richard Horn, with the help of his attorney and former federal prosecutor Brian Layton in late 2009, brought the CIA to its knees. The CIA's efforts to undermine Horn's work in Burma and getting that nation's government to stem the flow of heroin to the U.S. should come as no surprise to those familiar with.

31:55 the agency's history. It seems the CIA over the decades had found itself in the corner of narcotic traffickers all over the world. It's an ugly truth, but it is the truth. In early November 2009, government attorneys representing the interests of the CIA agreed to cut a deal with Horn, which called for the government to shell out $3 million to Horn in a settlement prior to his trial on the illegal wiretap.

32:26 In exchange, the CIA hoped to convince the judge in the case, Royce Lamberth, to erase from the court record several opinions that he had rendered that accused CIA officials of committing a fraud on the court. In other words, they had lied to the court. It seems the CIA had made a calculation in the Horns case that its war on drugs cannot endure the truth and could not remain in the court record.

32:59 For proof of that, we need to look at the CIA pedigreed officials who are in the scope of the federal judge's ire in the Horn case. Among them was CIA Director George Tenet and CIA General Counsel John Rizzo. Both Tenet and Rizzo played a key part in the George Bush administration. So did several other people in setting up a flawed

33:30 legal system to justify the CIA's use of torture. Both also were involved in the agency's leadership during the intelligence lapses of the 9-11. And yes, that's in air quotes. Horn's civil lawsuit filed in 94 names his defendants, former CIA station chief Arthur Brown and Frank Huddle Jr., who were both stationed in the country in the 90s with Horn.

33:59 In the litigation, both Horn and Huddle are accused of violating his constitutional rights. Horn also alleges the eavesdropping was a larger effort to basically allow the narco trafficking to continue. The judge in Horn's civil case in 2009, 15 years after Horn filed the pleading,

34:22 ruled that the CIA had committed a fraud on his court by failing to reveal in a timely manner that then CIA station chief Brown was no longer considered a covert operation or operative and they had no reason to not deal with the court. Brown had his official covert cover lifted in 2002.

34:52 Yet in 2008, the CIA was still saying he was a covert operative and could not have his name revealed, i.e. state secrets. That false claim resulted in Brown being dismissed as a defendant from the case.

35:11 It was not until January of 2008 when it became clear that Horn's case would continue with the State Department's huddle as a defendant that the CIA officials, in the wake of a sudden internal investigation, finally informed Judge Lamberth that Brown's covert status had been lifted six years before. Consequently, he was not considered someone that could be protected by state secrets privileges.

35:41 That was asserted by the CIA and State Department through the DOJ. After that revelation, Judge Lamberth determined in a series of subsequent opinions that Brown should be reinstated as a defendant and that the deceit related to Brown's cover status constituted a fraud on the court and that Horn's attorney, Layton, should be allowed to file a motion seeking sanctions.

36:11 against the CIA officials that lied. From latent sanction memo dated June 2009 in the wake of this ruling, quote, CIA Office of General Counsel attorneys and or former attorneys, John Rizzo, John Edinger, and John Radson attempted through their declarations to cover up when they had knowledge that Brown no longer was a covert asset.

36:43 agent. Former Director Tennant, who resigned as head of the CIA in 2004 after a seven-year stint as director, must likewise be sanctioned because of his declaration that caused the court to dismiss Brown from the case. And since it was former Director Tennant, who was still the director in 2002 at the time Brown's covert status was substantially changed to non-covert, his obligation to the court and the plaintiff was magnified.

37:14 defendant Brown, an agency official who retired from the CIA, and I should put air quotes over retired, 2005, and a defendant in the case likewise was required to inform the court of his changed status, unquote. So as a part of the Horns case filed in D.C. court, the U.S. District Judge, a former FISA court member,

37:40 Royce Lamberth opened the door for sanctions to be brought against Tennant and Rizzo. Also on the list were several other CIA officials like Robert Edinger, then acting Attorney General for operations in the CIA's office, meaning covert operations. It is also worth pointing out again that Edinger also played a key role in a criminal referral made to the DOJ.

38:10 That was based on false computer hacking accusations brought against U.S. Senate staffers investigating the CIA's torture program. That's the big scandal with Dianne Feinstein when they were looking into that program and they accused Brennan of spying on the Senate staff. And it just so happens that Edinger was involved in that as well.

38:38 judicial opinions in the Horn case are allowed to remain in the court record to be recalled and cited going forward by other lawyers and judges, then untold damage could be done to the reputation of the CIA. So they wanted it as sponge. They wanted it out of the record. And that is the only reason why they end up trying to make an offer. The federal judge presiding over a decade

39:06 And a half-long legal battle by former DEA agent Richard Horne against the CIA in the spring of 2010 finally weighed in on a proposed settlement agreement. In a ruling issued March 30, 2010, the federal judge agreed to dismiss the case and all pending court motions save two. The ruling triggers the government's requirement to pay Horne a total of $3 million in settlement.

39:36 The two motions, not dismissed but held in abeyance, dealt with the government's request to vacate opinions and orders issued by the judge on January 15, 2009 and February 6, 2009, both of which lay the groundwork for potential sanctions against CIA officers for the fraud on the court. The judge made the termination of those two opinions and orders contingent upon

40:05 U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder agreeing to make a referral to the appropriate IG office for an investigation of that wrongdoing and report to the appropriate congressional oversight. Quote, if the U.S. makes these notifications, then it is clear that this court's role should be at an end.

40:28 In this court's opinion and orders of January 15th and February 6th, 2009, and the actions of the court's grievance committee can be terminated. U.S. District Court Judge Royce Lamberth stated in his March 30th, 2010 ruling. Lamberth refers to three specific cases of alleged wrongdoing in that ruling.

40:53 One deals with the disturbing evidence of a sealed motion indicating that misconduct occurred in the IG office at both State Department and CIA. A court pleading filed in the litigation indicates that a former supervisory agent with the State Department's IG office had agreed to testify under oath that an investigation report that he

41:19 prepared was rewritten without his knowledge or permission and that his signature was forged. In addition, the former State Department investigative agent, Paul Forster, according to the court filings, planned to testify that his counterpart at the CIA IG office, an individual by the name of Michael Grefsky,

41:46 also contended with similar misconduct preparing his report inside of the CIA. The second case of wrongdoing mentioned the judge's ruling and goes to the heart of the Horns case, which was initiated based on his allegations that the former CIA and State Department, Brown and Huddle, had spied on him. Here, the judge had to say this, quote, as to the allegations of wrongdoing that form the basis of Horns' claim,

42:16 While the government makes no admission of wrongdoing in the settlement, the court is persuaded that the government must have at least found them credible to pay the man $3 million to make it go away. But it is the third case of alleged wrongdoing that seems to be the most unnerving. Specifically, those officials, all attorneys, are taking issue with this.

42:49 Quote, the allegations of wrongdoing by the government attorneys in this case are not only credible, they are admitted. Unquote. The facts that gave rise to the statement by the judge are the whole reason they now officially wanted Horn's case settled. Horn's litigation was shrouded under the cloak of national security for years until the summer of 2009.

43:20 When the judge in the case ordered, the court records unsealed and challenged the government's state secret claims in the wake of discovering CIA officials had misled the court. The agency's lawyers, according to court records, failed to notify the judge or the U.S. appeals court involved with some of the motions in the case that defendant Brown was not a covert operative. Again, CIA station chief.

43:49 lost his official covert status in 2002. Yet the government continued to claim Brown was a covert operative. There's no question that the CIA's attorneys failed to notify the court of his changed status until years after his status had changed. Even the CIA officials and affidavits filed with the court conceded the notification was not made in a timely manner. That's clearly wrongdoing legally.

44:20 None of them took personal responsibility for the lapse. Instead, they were relying on excuses and even said they forgot to do it. Three CIA attorneys cried foul over Lamberth's statement that the allegations of wrongdoing by government attorneys are admitted. They had a freaking cow. In motions filed in early April 2010, each of them asked the judge,

44:52 to retract that statement from the motion from John Rizzo's counsel. Quote, the court statement is inconsistent with the record in this case, as Mr. Rizzo has not admitted any personal wrongdoing and therefore should be removed from the court's memorandum. Unquote. From Jeffrey Yates, who was a CIA attorney assigned to National Clandestine Services.

45:24 His pleading said, quote, Mr. Yates has never admitted any wrongdoing in this manner. Quite the contrary, unquote, from Robert Edinger. Quote, none of the plaintiff's horns allegations regarding Mr. Edinger have been tested through adversarial proceedings. So there is no basis for any determination that those allegations are credible.

45:53 Furthermore, the allegations of wrongdoing as they pertain to Mr. Edinger, rather than being admitted, are most definitely contested, unquote. So there's the choir, all singing, petrified that it's going to be a matter of court record that their misconduct was admitted because they did admit it by sending in

46:22 documents that then later conceded that they all knew that he wasn't a covert action while they were claiming he was, which is a fraud on the court. Admitted or not admitted is still a fraud.

46:41 If Rizzo, Yates, and Edinger had nothing to fear in terms of their actions or inactions in the Horn case and sought to do the right thing by ridding the agency of bad actors, then why not file a motion in support of the judge's call for a referral of these allegations to the IG and Congress? Why did these CIA lawyers assume Lambreth was referring to them specifically in his ruling?

47:08 and seek to censor his words because he never mentioned them by name. They self-ID'd themselves. Lambert may well comply with the request as outlined in their motion, but there is no longer any question as to who they were talking about and what they did, thanks to their own undoing.

47:43 The attorneys at the U.S. Department of Justice in July of 2010 filed a motion in federal court indicating that Congress was notified officially of the corruption allegations involving the CIA. The motion substantiates a prior report that the author had published in Narco News July 4, 2010 that revealed at least one congressional committee had launched an investigation into alleged CIA.

48:12 deception that surfaced in a lawsuit accusing the agency of spying on a DEA agent, the one we've been talking about. Given the implications, it should have certainly been something Congress was interested in. The CIA claimed, however, that it had later shown all of this basically to be bogus and that Judge Lamberth in 2009

48:43 was prompted as a result of this claim to unseal the case. In addition to the deception played on the court by the CIA with respects to the unwarranted national security claims, evidence also surfaced that the management at both state and CIA had pressured their investigators to falsify their reports. Due to the extensive pattern of alleged fraud and corruption exposed in this case,

49:10 Judge Lamberth pressed the DOJ to make a referral to the appropriate IGs to investigate the wrongdoing. Why in the hell wouldn't DOJ just investigate it? It's not like they don't have people to do that. That's their entire function. Judge Lamberth wrote,

49:41 The allegations set forth in the court's opinion and order to the Integrity Committee of the Council of Inspector Generals on Integrity and Efficiency and informed their respective congressional oversight committees of the allegations. The government respectfully requests that the court now grant the government's motion to vacate the court's opinion and orders.

50:04 On September 21st, 2010, Judge Lamberth issued an order erasing the pending motions in the Horn case with the government agreeing to pay him $3 million. Quote, the following sentence is hereby removed from this court's March 30th, 2010 memorandum. Here the allegations of wrongdoing by the government attorneys in the case are not only credible, they are admitted. So that's what they wanted sealed.

50:32 They wanted it removed. Upon consideration of the referrals of the allegations to the IG and the House Oversight Committee, which we know goes nowhere, I'll go ahead and remove that because they paid the guy off. That's the end of that part. Freaking crazy. So yeah, nothing ever happened. Nobody was ever fired, nothing. They weren't debarred, nothing.

51:16 forgery, lying, eavesdropping, whatever, the drug trade goes on. Now you understand why. They're all beside themselves that there's actually for the first time ever a war on drugs. Your typical kabuki dance. Is that what you're saying? That's exactly what I'm saying. Did you enjoy the theater? Yeah. Yeah. Just crazy.

51:52 What happened to our space? Nobody in it. And that's weird because normally, you know, even a bunch of our normal people aren't in here. So we have some, but you know. I'm glad everybody's here that's here. But I don't know if it's because I did get a text from somebody that was trying to get in. X did an update and I don't know if that's the problem.

52:22 thankfully Bridget always monitors that and texts me and says hey update your phone because if I don't then it kicks me out of our own space I try yeah you know yeah the best laid plans of mice and men you know yeah so anyway um I had fun this morning I appeared on a

52:45 I don't know if it's an Idaho radio station, but my friend General Blaine Holt is guest hosting a morning radio station program, talk radio for the next two weeks. And he had me on his first day. So we got to chit chat about what was going on and just kind of introduce all of the stuff that we talk about every day.

53:15 That'll be fun. Also, we recorded yesterday, it's not out yet, is it our third installment of the history of Operation Gladio? We talked about...

53:31 how much bigger Operation Paperclip was than what people believe. It's just like jet engines and rocket engines and stuff like that. We talked about the bio and chemical warfare and how that migrated and how Otto Skorzeny took out the Egyptian ones basically for Israel.

53:56 after they were way too efficient in getting their missile program up and running. So that was a fun one. I'll let you guys know when that comes out. That's with Ben Keller and him and I are going to do a series. Every Sunday we record a new session. We're basically time-wise.

54:19 timeline wise going to run through operation gladio and so we're still talking about the immediate aftermath of world war ii because as you guys know there was like 10 different things happening so the first 10 shows we don't even leave 1947 um so it's um

54:42 been very interesting. And I had someone reach out, which was very encouraging and say that they homeschool and they're very excited about using these segments as real history, as opposed to the history that you find in history books. And so very encouraging. Oh yeah. And by the way, down that same line, did you see the thing with the Rosa Parks? What thing?

55:13 Uh, apparently she, it was, okay, it was always put into our history books as an organic. It just reminded me of the, you know, everything that we've been studying, everything that is not organic, but orchestrated in order to accomplish a purpose. And that she was actually an activist for the NAACP, including her husband, at length.

55:43 and they even billed it and decided that she was the best candidate because she would be more appealing when it went to court. Yeah. Even the guy behind her, the white man behind her, was a journalist on the photo that we all know because it was in all our history books, but it was a photo op. Yeah. The entire thing was staged. Yes. The whole thing was an illusion. Another kabuki dance. Yep. We're just monkeys in a circus.

56:18 I'm telling you, the more time that goes by and the more research we do and the more this stuff comes out, the statement that we made over a year ago that we've been living in a hologram becomes more and more true. You know, it really... The entire world is a hologram. And it always takes me back. I know you're not a movie watcher. Did you ever watch The Matrix?

56:45 I think I did, but it would have been a long time ago. Okay. But that really, in so many ways, does ring through. Yeah. Because it's all being beamed into their head that this is the reality and none of it is real. Yeah. In fact, one of the funnier things, and somebody pointed it out to me the other day, and that is in the Matrix movie, you know, how all these...

57:16 Any character at any given moment can change into an Agent X or whatever his name was. I don't remember. One of the, we'll call it. And it's funny because if you change that to CIA, you know, it really, really rings true. Yeah. Just saying. Yeah, I think if I had time.

57:40 Going back and watching a bunch of those movies now that I know what's going on would be very entertaining. And to research who did them, what CIA guy was out in Hollywood at the time, because there's always one out there. And to, you know, kind of just chronicalize the...

58:06 telling us what they're about to do to us type thing um i think it would be very interesting as a project um i just simply don't have the time to do that but i i do think it would be very interesting because it is clear that that is exactly what they were doing oh absolutely and and you have to remember it goes from script you know from original story to script

58:35 I mean, this is a long, drawn-out process. So by the time we're getting it, it has gone through a lot of machinations before it actually comes to a theater near you and shows you how much the planning is involved. But to your point, we've also found out that a lot of the scripts are written by the CIA. That is true. Right. Yeah. And how active they were in Hollywood, right?

59:04 Yes, and they had CIA agents in Hollywood. That was their whole job is if a studio was considering doing a job that had anything to do with foreign affairs or anything like that, that they would run it by the CIA in order to make sure that the right bad guy was used, the right country, and that type of thing, even in the fiction ones.

59:34 Yeah. Everything is a hologram. Oh, and Cool Want over on Rumble Got It. Agent Smith. That's what it was. Agent Smith, not Agent X. Oh, and The Matrix. Yeah. Yep. Yep. Yep. All right. Comprehensive. Let's see. Comprehensive Nomad. You're living among a nightmare world of unaccountable and you survive by learning.

1:00:06 to trust no adjacent units. Yeah. I didn't notice the plug in the back of my head until I saw the matrix. You guys crack me up. Hopefully you're just joking. Let's see. Baker Sarge. Yeah. Congress interest clarified by Schumer. The CIA has six ways to Sunday to get you.

1:00:38 Let them do whatever they want. We're not going to touch them. And by six ways to Sunday, Chuck Schumer is old enough to know about Leo Ryan. There's one way they can get to you. And the most drastic way is to kill you. And he knows unequivocally that they will do that. Anything less than that is the other five ways. He understands very clearly what the sixth way is. All right.

1:01:10 Thank you guys for being here. I appreciate it. We're going to go ahead and close and we will be back tomorrow at four o'clock. Take care, everybody.

Entities here

CIA49 U.S. State Department27 Burma25 Richard Horn25 DEA21 Horn v. United States (Civil Litigation)18 Royce Lamberth17 Arthur Brown14 Horn v. CIA12 Franklin Huddle Jr.12 Brian Layton10 Paul Forster9 United States8 Inspector General7 John Rizzo6 U.S. Department of Justice6 John Edinger5 Richard Shelby5 Locke Lau5 U.S. Congress5 Unknown Book (Chapter 9/10)4 Fabian Society4 Michael Grebsky3 George Tenet3 Hollywood3 United Kingdom2 Golden Triangle2 Charles Schumer2 Rosa Parks2 Operation Gladio2 Jeffrey Yates2 Chiang Kai-shek2 State Law and Order Restoration Council2 China2 Narco News1 Leo Ryan1 Skull and Bones1 Operation Paperclip1 Israel1 Laos1

Claims made here

Paul Forster spied_on Richard Horn documented ▶ 4:25

“It basically provided an overview of what Forster would say under oath at his deposition. It hinted at additional information damaging to the government. This is a quote from the pleadings. The Horn m…”

U.S. State Department covered_up Richard Horn host_asserted ▶ 5:51

“upon his conversation with others in a position to know that the Department of State IG report was classified in order to prevent Horn, his counsel, the media, and the U.S. Congress from gaining acces…”

CIA covered_up Richard Horn host_asserted ▶ 6:07

“Forster also knows from his earlier conversations with Mike Grybski, his counterpart at the CIA, that the CIA intended to use the classification of documents as the centerpiece of its tactics to fend …”

CIA spied_on Richard Horn host_asserted ▶ 7:04

“by his attorney. Then chapter nine starts going in. That's the overview. Former DEA agent Richard Horn fought the U.S. government in court for years trying to prove the CIA illegally spied on him as p…”

Royce Lamberth covered_up Richard Horn documented ▶ 8:08

“after crucial evidence in the case was suppressed on the grounds of national security. Because the entire court record has been sealed by the judge, no one would have ever known that Horn's case was t…”

Arthur Brown spied_on Richard Horn host_asserted ▶ 11:42

“Huddle managed to get Horn run out of Burma through the State Department. And his attorney contends, but only after Horn discovered the CIA had planted eavesdropping equipment in his private home in B…”

Franklin Huddle Jr. removed_from_power Richard Horn host_asserted ▶ 11:42

CIA spied_on DEA host_asserted ▶ 13:11

“Horn's attorney in his letter to Senator Shelby contends the CIA's net is much bigger than Burma and that they regularly spy on DEA agents everywhere. And we know that to be true because we've read it…”

Franklin Huddle Jr. trained United Wa State Army host_asserted ▶ 17:08

“Layton also claims that Huddle undermined Horn's efforts to provide Burma's prosecutors and police with U.S. assistance to implement its drug laws. Why? Well, we know why. In contrast, Layton pointed …”

Arthur Brown framed Richard Horn host_asserted ▶ 17:40

“Gosh, where have we seen that before? Like literally everywhere. Horne also said that according to the allegation outlined in Judge Lambert's ruling, the CIA station chief, Brown compromised a DEA inf…”

Locke Lau spied_on China documented ▶ 26:26

“in a workplace discrimination lawsuit that he filed with the DOJ that he had spied on China in the late 80s and 90s for the FBI and the CIA. Although Lau is prohibited from discussing the specifics of…”

CIA financed_via United Wa State Army host_asserted ▶ 27:27

“not to mention the funding for the CIA's covert actions. The CIA can use the proceeds of the drug trade to pay for armies around the world, which we know in fact they do. Lau also says a lot of career…”

CIA paid Richard Horn documented ▶ 31:55

“the agency's history. It seems the CIA over the decades had found itself in the corner of narcotic traffickers all over the world. It's an ugly truth, but it is the truth. In early November 2009, gove…”

George Tenet member_of CIA documented ▶ 32:59

“For proof of that, we need to look at the CIA pedigreed officials who are in the scope of the federal judge's ire in the Horn case. Among them was CIA Director George Tenet and CIA General Counsel Joh…”

John Rizzo member_of CIA documented ▶ 32:59

Royce Lamberth exposed CIA documented ▶ 35:41

“That was asserted by the CIA and State Department through the DOJ. After that revelation, Judge Lamberth determined in a series of subsequent opinions that Brown should be reinstated as a defendant an…”

John Edinger covered_up Horn v. CIA documented ▶ 36:11

“against the CIA officials that lied. From latent sanction memo dated June 2009 in the wake of this ruling, quote, CIA Office of General Counsel attorneys and or former attorneys, John Rizzo, John Edin…”

John Rizzo covered_up Horn v. CIA documented ▶ 36:11

John Radson covered_up Horn v. CIA documented ▶ 36:11

CIA covered_up Horn v. CIA documented ▶ 36:11

George Tenet covered_up Horn v. CIA documented ▶ 36:43

“agent. Former Director Tennant, who resigned as head of the CIA in 2004 after a seven-year stint as director, must likewise be sanctioned because of his declaration that caused the court to dismiss Br…”

CIA paid Richard Horn documented ▶ 39:06

“And a half-long legal battle by former DEA agent Richard Horne against the CIA in the spring of 2010 finally weighed in on a proposed settlement agreement. In a ruling issued March 30, 2010, the feder…”

Paul Forster exposed U.S. State Department documented ▶ 40:53

“One deals with the disturbing evidence of a sealed motion indicating that misconduct occurred in the IG office at both State Department and CIA. A court pleading filed in the litigation indicates that…”

Michael Grebsky covered_up CIA documented ▶ 41:19

“prepared was rewritten without his knowledge or permission and that his signature was forged. In addition, the former State Department investigative agent, Paul Forster, according to the court filings…”

U.S. State Department spied_on Richard Horn host_asserted ▶ 41:46

“also contended with similar misconduct preparing his report inside of the CIA. The second case of wrongdoing mentioned the judge's ruling and goes to the heart of the Horns case, which was initiated b…”

CIA spied_on Richard Horn host_asserted ▶ 41:46

Otto Skorzeny carried_out_attack Egypt host_asserted ▶ 53:31

“how much bigger Operation Paperclip was than what people believe. It's just like jet engines and rocket engines and stuff like that. We talked about the bio and chemical warfare and how that migrated …”

Rosa Parks member_of NAACP host_asserted ▶ 55:13

“Uh, apparently she, it was, okay, it was always put into our history books as an organic. It just reminded me of the, you know, everything that we've been studying, everything that is not organic, but…”

CIA funded Hollywood host_asserted ▶ 58:35

“I mean, this is a long, drawn-out process. So by the time we're getting it, it has gone through a lot of machinations before it actually comes to a theater near you and shows you how much the planning…”

CIA member_of Hollywood host_asserted ▶ 59:04

“Yes, and they had CIA agents in Hollywood. That was their whole job is if a studio was considering doing a job that had anything to do with foreign affairs or anything like that, that they would run i…”