Horn v. CIA event
also: Horn's case, the Horns case
Explore in graph → Export claims (CSV) ↓
Related entities (most co-mentioned)
CIAintelligence service · 9Royce Lamberthperson · 9U.S. State Departmentorganization · 3U.S. Department of Justiceorganization · 2John Rizzoperson · 2U.S. Congressorganization · 2Brian Laytonperson · 1John Edingerperson · 1Jeffrey Yatesperson · 1Inspector Generalorganization · 1Narco Newsorganization · 1
Claims (5)
George Tenet covered_up
Horn v. CIA documented
“agent. Former Director Tennant, who resigned as head of the CIA in 2004 after a seven-year stint as director, must likewise be sanctioned because of his declaration that caused the court to dismiss Brown from the case. And since it was form…”
▶ he Colonel's Corner The Great Pretense Part 4 @ 36:43
John Edinger covered_up
Horn v. CIA documented
“against the CIA officials that lied. From latent sanction memo dated June 2009 in the wake of this ruling, quote, CIA Office of General Counsel attorneys and or former attorneys, John Rizzo, John Edinger, and John Radson attempted through t…”
▶ he Colonel's Corner The Great Pretense Part 4 @ 36:11
John Rizzo covered_up
Horn v. CIA documented
“against the CIA officials that lied. From latent sanction memo dated June 2009 in the wake of this ruling, quote, CIA Office of General Counsel attorneys and or former attorneys, John Rizzo, John Edinger, and John Radson attempted through t…”
▶ he Colonel's Corner The Great Pretense Part 4 @ 36:11
John Radson covered_up
Horn v. CIA documented
“against the CIA officials that lied. From latent sanction memo dated June 2009 in the wake of this ruling, quote, CIA Office of General Counsel attorneys and or former attorneys, John Rizzo, John Edinger, and John Radson attempted through t…”
▶ he Colonel's Corner The Great Pretense Part 4 @ 36:11
CIA covered_up
Horn v. CIA documented
“against the CIA officials that lied. From latent sanction memo dated June 2009 in the wake of this ruling, quote, CIA Office of General Counsel attorneys and or former attorneys, John Rizzo, John Edinger, and John Radson attempted through t…”
▶ he Colonel's Corner The Great Pretense Part 4 @ 36:11
Mentions (12)
▶ 34:22
ruled that the CIA had committed a fraud on his court by failing to reveal in a timely manner that then CIA station chief Brown was no longer considered a covert operation or operative and they had no reason to not deal with the court. Brow…
▶ 35:11
It was not until January of 2008 when it became clear that Horn's case would continue with the State Department's huddle as a defendant that the CIA officials, in the wake of a sudden internal investigation, finally informed Judge Lamberth …
▶ 35:41
That was asserted by the CIA and State Department through the DOJ. After that revelation, Judge Lamberth determined in a series of subsequent opinions that Brown should be reinstated as a defendant and that the deceit related to Brown's cov…
▶ 37:14
defendant Brown, an agency official who retired from the CIA, and I should put air quotes over retired, 2005, and a defendant in the case likewise was required to inform the court of his changed status, unquote. So as a part of the Horns ca…
▶ 39:06
And a half-long legal battle by former DEA agent Richard Horne against the CIA in the spring of 2010 finally weighed in on a proposed settlement agreement. In a ruling issued March 30, 2010, the federal judge agreed to dismiss the case and …
▶ 41:46
also contended with similar misconduct preparing his report inside of the CIA. The second case of wrongdoing mentioned the judge's ruling and goes to the heart of the Horns case, which was initiated based on his allegations that the former …
▶ 42:49
Quote, the allegations of wrongdoing by the government attorneys in this case are not only credible, they are admitted. Unquote. The facts that gave rise to the statement by the judge are the whole reason they now officially wanted Horn's c…
▶ 44:20
None of them took personal responsibility for the lapse. Instead, they were relying on excuses and even said they forgot to do it. Three CIA attorneys cried foul over Lamberth's statement that the allegations of wrongdoing by government att…
▶ 46:41
If Rizzo, Yates, and Edinger had nothing to fear in terms of their actions or inactions in the Horn case and sought to do the right thing by ridding the agency of bad actors, then why not file a motion in support of the judge's call for a r…
▶ 47:43
The attorneys at the U.S. Department of Justice in July of 2010 filed a motion in federal court indicating that Congress was notified officially of the corruption allegations involving the CIA. The motion substantiates a prior report that t…
▶ 48:12
deception that surfaced in a lawsuit accusing the agency of spying on a DEA agent, the one we've been talking about. Given the implications, it should have certainly been something Congress was interested in. The CIA claimed, however, that …
▶ 50:04
On September 21st, 2010, Judge Lamberth issued an order erasing the pending motions in the Horn case with the government agreeing to pay him $3 million. Quote, the following sentence is hereby removed from this court's March 30th, 2010 memo…