The Shadow State Pt. 10; The Ties Between Banking and Intelligence (2 of 2)

1:16:13 · recorded 2024-09-21 · ▶ watch on Rumble

auto-scroll word highlight ▶ Rumble @ here

Transcript

0:15 Yeah, y'all, come on in. It's Jamison Haygood, and I am a watchman on the wall here in the state of Mississippi. I hope you're ready to be transformed by the renewing of your mind. We've waited long enough. It's time to get after it. I'm so thankful to be joined once again by War Hamster Brady. He's on X, formerly known as Twitter, at War underscore Hamster 1776. You can look him up on Rumble by searching War Hamster and original intent constitutionalist.

0:44 a historian, a reformed Wall Street guy, and what is a new friend of mine, a new source of information, and a very interesting guy, too. Maybe we have to have him on another time just to talk about scuba diving and running around the Pacific Ocean and the Caribbean and all the stuff that he's done besides defend this Constitution and also try to recover.

1:12 the republic and i say that in past tense because we both agree that's the scenario we find ourselves in this is part two of analyzing the ties that bind the connections to western intelligence and the international banking system it's war hamster brady sir thanks for taking time to be part of the show today hey james and thanks for having me on again yes sir we started you started way back in venice in the 13th century as we talked about these uh private sector

1:42 kind of oligarch run banking systems and you brought it all the way up to the mid 20th century last time. And we can kind of work in any of those other reviews we need to for this, what we're calling part two, but where would you like, excuse me, where would you like to go with today? Yeah. I left a lot of audience with a teaser at the very end of our last show. And I think we'll talk about how, when the CIA was formed in 1947, one of the very first.

2:12 The head of the CIA was Alan Dulles, and his brother, John Foster Dulles, was at the time the head of the State Department. And it's no coincidence. Mike Benz, you can find him at Mike Benz' site around Rumble, does a wonderful job talking about what he calls the blob. And what he'll tell people is, when you hear the name State Department, you should always think also Pentagon and CIA. The three are joined at the hip. This is what we call Colonel Watkins.

2:41 Connor Watkins would call the international syndicate. I just call it the shadow state. They all pretty much describe the same amorphous entity of interested corporations, NGOs, government agencies, and private actors who really call the shots in the world. Yes, we're familiar with Mike Benz's work. It's been incredible. We play it a lot here on the show. And seeing you guys connect all the same dots has been real interesting. And it really proves that this is now this blob.

3:11 this international crime syndicate, this blending of private sector power in banking and roundtable groups mixing with the capital S, uppercase S state, is now really out in the open. What you call the shadow network, the shadow government, is now out in the open, and we're seeing them kind of enclose around us. Without a doubt.

3:40 They've been exposed for a number of reasons. Their activities are much more apparent. The Internet has a lot to do with it. But I'll get to that a little bit later. Yes, sir. What I wanted to do is take a little bit of a step back and introduce your audience to a gentleman by the name of John J. McCloy. Okay. If you're not familiar, he is one of the movers and shakers in how this whole apparatus got set up post-World War II and even during the war. And he's a fun story because I think he exemplifies.

4:08 a character who's gone from the legal field into international banking to work for the government at the highest levels, working back for major banks, sitting on other boards. And if I watch that history, it really is a great illustration of just how interconnected everything is. Great, great. That's a good place to start. So John J. McCloy didn't grow up wealthy or anything like that. He ended up starting to go to school. I forget the name of the college. It wasn't anything special.

4:38 Ended up getting into World War I, promoted all the way up to captain relatively quickly, and then retired in 1919. Where he goes back to Harvard Law School and gets his degree, he would eventually go into international banking, sort of like what the Dulles brothers had been doing. And no coincidence, one of his biggest clients would be German interests, especially IG Farben, same multinational chemical corporation, one of the most powerful.

5:08 corporations in the world throughout history, the same one that Alan Dulles represented. And so that's what he's doing for most of the 30s, working in private law, international banking. World War II breaks out, and Secretary of War, Henry Stinson, puts together his war advisory board, and McCloy is named for that. He had a lot of, he'd done some lawsuits against the Japanese when it came to naval sabotage, had his expertise, he'd litigated a bunch of that, and of course he had all those international connections in Europe.

5:43 So he was a pretty good choice to be on that board. He was promoted all the way to the Assistant Secretary of War when a couple of new ideas were created. One was the OSS. Another was the Pentagon, the building itself and the structure of the U.S. military with multi-branches. That's on his resume. So this is not a small player.

6:10 He was also probably the guy behind more than any of the push for the Japanese internment camps. Let's say that. A little smirch on his record. So Stimson's off to a pretty good start to his career. I'm sorry. McCauley's off to a pretty good start to his career, but he's just getting started. As he's sitting on the war committee advisory board, there's an incident called Operation Golden Lily. Are your audience familiar with Operation Golden Lily?

6:41 I don't believe so. And the only other time we've looked into John J. McCloy was with Colonel Towner Watkins when she briefly gave us an overview. So this is excellent stuff because, once again, Brady, what I'm looking to do, because daily when we see this international syndicate of non-government organizations and these unelected bureaucracies doing the bidding of, say, big tech or some big pharma organization in this new blending of neo-fascism.

7:08 You are connecting the dots with real names and the founding of these institutions and the original connections of this, so please keep going. Okay, so prior to World War II, the U.S. entry into World War II, Japan was over in Asia, looting and plundering just about everything they could get their hands on. Imperial and Japan were not good actors in any way, shape, or form. After the Battle of Midway, it becomes crystal clear that the U.S. is going to win the Battle of Upshift, and Japan starts...

7:37 retreating, and one of the things they're trying to do is get all of their stolen gold and loot back to Japan. That is not an easy process in the middle of a war. What happened is one of the Japanese generals ended up realizing he's not going to be able to get his last very big ship of gold back to Japan, so they start digging these 100-foot-deep holes to hide them in the Philippines. MacArthur returns to the Philippines, liberates it, and they hear rumors of this hidden stash of gold. Finally capture one of his general's chauffeur drivers.

8:09 Probably asked very nicely to get the information from him of where these caches of gold were located and found them. Right. MacArthur realizes what a big deal it is. He's so much stolen gold. Flies all the way back across the world, meets with Truman in his office with three members of the War Advisory Board. And that was a guy by the name of Anderson, a guy by the name of Lovett. He's a Skull and Bones alumni. Yes. And, of course, McCoy. Okay. They create what's called the Anderson Trust to oversee.

8:40 This stolen loot, and the Anderson Trust exists to this day. Most researchers will tell you this is a big nest egg of the off-the-books treasury of the CIA and other intelligence operations. It all comes from Operation Golden Lily, and he's one of the people overseeing it. So let me, okay, let me, I'll let you keep going, and maybe we'll go back, because all of this, and what I want to do today as well, Brady, because I know you have such a vast expanse of knowledge.

9:09 All of this is what we're calling bringing the receipts with connecting real names and real institutions and real dates with this connection that we talk about the banking system being in the intelligence system and the intelligence agencies being a tool of the international bankers to bring about world government. So you're connecting all these dots. So just so I get that clear, these three guys that in particular, like a John J. McCloy type who had been in.

9:40 It was a lawyer. He had got into international banking, working with these different groups of oligarchs that would want to control resources. And then he's now in this war department, and he hears from, it's MacArthur, right? So he becomes privy to these Japanese hidden gold stashes. Yeah, this is the U.S. military exfiltrating all this gold, bringing it back to Israel. Okay. Probably Swiss banks. I don't remember the exact details on that.

10:12 But yeah, I mean, there's basically five people in the world who know about it at the time. That's the key. No one's president of the United States. That would be the key, is a group, you know, McCloy now, connected to the outside international banking world and all these other oligarchs, is now privy to information that only five people really know about. Yeah, and they keep everything very well compartmentalized. Sure, sure. Yes, sir. Okay, keep going.

10:40 McCloy's next tour of duty is the governor general of Germany, post-World War II reconstructed Germany. And the time he was there was interesting because it's right there in the Nuremberg trials. He would do things. He was pushing back on Nazi prosecutions. He would commute sentences with tribunals, you know, sentence some of the death that he just commuted on his own as a governor general. One of the people that he commuted was Richard Galen, who Colonel Connor Watkins has talked a lot about, former SS officer who became a very high-ranking CIA.

11:10 and Operation Gladiator Operator. Yes, sir. Now, you're calling him Richard. Is Reinhard, is that the German for Richard? Yeah, I'll take your word for that. I don't know. I don't know the answer. I just had studied him. Originally, I thought it was Reinhard Galen, but I knew it had to be the same guy. Great. Yes, sir. Yeah. If you say Galen, we're too blessed to know exactly who he is. There you go. Yes, sir.

11:43 I'm going to skip one of his next things he does, because then he goes back to his private life. And he would work for the chairman of Chase Manhattan Bank, and that's a big position. When you say Chase Manhattan Bank, remember, that's the Rockefeller Bank, always has been. He would be the chairman of the Ford Foundation. Those of you who remember Henry Ford was a big Nazi financier. He then became a trustee of the Rockefeller Foundation on a couple of occasions. And from 1954 to 1970, this guy is the chair of the Council of Foreign Relations.

12:13 For 17 years. We already talked about how the CFR is probably the entity most responsible for calling the shots at the CIA. That's how important this guy was. What gets really funny, the one part I skipped over, is after JFK was shot, they created what was called the Warren Commission. And that commission was made up of seven people. There was, of course, Chief Justice Warren himself, who wasn't really an active participant. There was Alan Dulles.

12:48 We all know about it. He deposed him as the head of the CIA. Yes, sir. Fired him in 1961. Say again? 1961. Yes, sir. Fired. Yeah, too indiscriminate. I apologize. I'm going to stop stepping on you, sir. I'm eager. Just keep going. I apologize. And I apologize to the audience. Don't worry. That's what I'm so used to doing video. You can see someone when they want to step in. You know when to pause. Radio is a lot harder. I'm still new to it, so it's my fault.

13:24 The other people on the Warren Commission, of course, we had two indiscriminate congressmen and two senators, one of which was Gerald Ford. Gerald Ford would end up being an unelected president of the United States. His VP was a Rockefeller. They took over for Nixon, a person that we believe that the blob took down, probably because he was going to end the Vietnam War. But the last member on the Warren Commission was the president of the World Bank.

13:53 My name is John J. McCloy. And I ask you, what is the president of the World Bank? How is he qualified to investigate the assassination of a president? Absolutely amazing. Absolutely amazing. Hey, let's stay on time and let me take the break right here. And I'll try to not mess this up, Brady. In my zeal to show how obvious the connections that really these government

14:23 entities have all been doing the bidding of international bankers, oligarchs with the open intent in their own writings that are tied to monopoly capitalism, monopoly capitalists that openly say that world technocratic government is the only way for peace, is the only way for utopia. I have struggled at times to really

14:51 Connect the dots and show what I mean with the actual people involved in this. Just in the first segment, through the study of John J. McCloy's A Perfect Microcosm of how these networks are all integrated, we could do the whole next week of shows based off of just the information you've given us right here. And now you know why I'm so thankful to have Warhamster Brady with me.

15:20 For the remainder of this show, you need to send out the links, wyab.com, and click listen. You can stream it from anywhere on the planet. When we tell you there is an international crime syndicate, a shadow government that from inception has been building world government, it is Warhamster Brady today bringing the receipts, and real history is hindsight with 20-20 vision. We'll be right back.

15:52 It's not revenge we're after. It's the reckoning, and you can bet the reckoning is on its way. You're in a good fight with Jameson Haygood. We have on the program today War Hamster Brady. He's on X at war underscore hamster 1776. You can go to Rumble, and you can search War Hamster. You can see all of his work that he's put out and his videos on his Rumble channel. Before we left in the first segment, I tell you what, I'm still amped up, man. We have...

16:19 Brady laid out the microcosm of the proof that the international banking system and the spy agencies have always been connected from inception of these spy agencies. And he did it through the microcosm of a John J. McCloy. He started out there, McCloy, as a lawyer. He was in the military.

16:45 In World War One, but then he came out, he went to law school, that he was went into the international banking industry, and then he found himself in the war cabinet there in the Second World War. Then he was put over the as the I think governor general of Germany. I believe that's what you called it, Brady. And he was able to.

17:09 Then pick out people of the Nazi regime that would be important to this international crime syndicate, this international banking cabal, to be able to keep the Nazi stay-behind networks and spy networks in place. Matter of fact, that's where we run into John J. McCloy saving Reinhard or Richard Galen, who was high up in the Nazi SS, running the stay-behind spy networks and brought him into the intel agencies.

17:38 Later, Galen is a major part, if not running, the NATO networks. NATO, run by a real-life Nazi, once again, because they didn't free Europe. They just kept the networks in place in order to make sure all of these countries didn't go into a republic like we lived, but to stay into a system of world technocratic government. So that's what John J. McCoy did to...

18:06 save Reinhard Galen and put him in power in NATO, he later becomes, this John J. McCloy, becomes the chairman of Chase Manhattan Bank, the Rockefeller Institution.

18:18 He's also with the Ford Foundation, part of these private sector roundtable groups through which, like Dr. Carol Quigley lays out in Tragedy and Hope, through which these roundtable groups would be the ones steering international policy. Not a theory. It's a real thing. He's high up in the, if not running, the Rockefeller Foundation. Then he's put, John J. McCoy's put onto the Warren Commission.

18:45 And when he is the president of the World Bank. Now, what would the president of the World Bank need to be doing on the Warren Commission looking into or we should say covering up the JFK assassination? Just in what Brady has laid out there, we could study and we will. We could study for weeks and weeks to continue to make sure that everybody understands that these spy agencies were never about making a certain.

19:12 country strong they were about doing the bidding of the international bankers now i will move out of the way and let war hamster brady continue did i get all that about right would that be a good summary you got that exactly right excellent man that is incredible that right there that right there and i am amped up today i'm gonna have to calm down that right there brings the receipts that that that shows what we're talking about

19:40 We could end the show today, and we will have done more in the state of Mississippi than we could ever have imagined for today, but you got more. Keep going. Okay, so we're talking about the World Bank. It comes into play at the 1944 Bretton Woods Agreement. By the way, I'm sitting less than an hour away from Bretton Woods itself right this minute. That's here in New Hampshire. I didn't realize that until recently. What's going on in the world is, you know, we're talking about 400 years or so.

20:12 of multinational corporations basically starting to control the government that had created them. And they're doing so because they want to exploit resources around the world. Cheap resources mean greater profits. Yes, sir. They had, for centuries, been able to use overt force in invading armies. That pretty much changed in the middle of the 20th century, the use of brute force. In 1948, there was a world agreement.

20:42 Something called the Right to Conquest got changed. And it's important in the United Nations Charter, it's Article 2, Paragraph 4, it says, quote, all members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state or in any other manner inconsistent with the purposes of the United Nations. Now, that seems to be a bit of a handcuff when it comes to empire that's always relied on invasion.

21:13 to flex their muscle and enforce their will. So they had to develop new strategies, and it wasn't just going to be intelligence gathering. It wasn't just going to be covert operations. They had to bring in the international banking syndicate and create a one-world government without appearing to be a one-world government. They're going to do this through the legal system and through financial leverage. Bretton Woods meant that English pound was no longer the world's reserve currency the U.S. dollar would be.

21:46 The UK went from being the big brother to the little brother, but the Anglo-American alliance never changed. They joined together with about four or five other European nations, France, West Germany. I want to say Switzerland was there. They had double-checked, had created what was called the World Bank. These are governments, a government-owned entity. It's made up of five main sections. You have the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development. You've got the International Development Association. You've got the International Finance Corporation. You've got the multi-level.

22:18 I'm sorry, Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency. And you've heard of all these off and on, but the previous acronyms, we really don't know what they do. And we're going to talk about that a little bit, what they actually do. The fifth one is something that came around in the 60s, and I'm going to spend more time on that. It's called ICSID, I-C-S-I-D, and I'm giving the exact acronym on that. Hold on, I've got it. It's the International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes. Wow. And what does that sound like to you?

22:48 Right. Help me. Help me. It is a court. It is a financial court. Right, okay. When an international investor has a dispute with a local government, it doesn't get settled domestically. It goes to an international kind of tribunal of three lawyers or judges, and those decisions can never be appealed. Right. And you don't enter into any of these world trade agreements, quote-unquote free trade.

23:16 Unless it's got ISDS, which are investor state dispute settlements, attached. That is how they use financial and legal muscle. They can actually go into a company like, these are all kinds of examples of where it's been done. Basically, a private corporation can sue a company like, say, Venezuela, because we want access to your oil resources. The U.S. has a choice. If you get a guy like Maduro, apart from a good guy, he says no.

23:47 Well, now you get on the bad list of our State Department. That's what's going on there right now. It's a flight of our resources. Yeah. But taking a step back, you know, we've got this new paradigm of how to insert international influence for corporate. What was going on around the world in the 50s was decolonization. And you saw a few examples of this. You know, countries basically saying, hey, we're now sovereign. We're no longer under the thumb of the British Empire.

24:18 We're going to start to form our own government for our own people and claim our own resources. That's what we call nationalism. And this is the one thing that the blob or the shadow state cannot stand. Yes, sir. A strong national government will always be able to oppose these international rules and laws and treaties. The international corporations will get shut out of the resources they want to exploit. That's why if you look at all the countries we've toppled.

24:44 It always is one that was trying to start a national movement. And that started out with national socialist movements, and then it shifted to these national populist movements, which is what they're going after today. The point being, they want someone in power that will play the game, self-enrich themselves so the multinational corporations can continue to exploit. Does that all make sense? That is a perfect way to take a break right here. Yes, sir, it does. You said, repeat that line that you just said, what they're looking for.

25:13 The regimes that they will install through these fake elections, through popping up a dictator that will be a puppet for them. Repeat what you said, please, that last part of you. In the United States, for example, I'm going to steal some material from Mike Benz because I think he explains it better than I ever did. But if you have the right and the left politically in any country, in America especially, in there you have the populist right and the establishment right. On the other side, you've got the populist left and the establishment left.

25:45 Right. Well, the reason you see U.S. foreign policy hasn't changed in decades, whether it's a Republican or Democrat, is the president of the United States isn't the one setting policy. It's this gigantic blob that's setting international policy. They need a president who is not, who's establishment and not a populist. We've seen two or three examples since World War II of a populist president. You know, JFK, and we know what happened to him. I wouldn't say, actually, Nixon's Council of Foreign Relations.

26:16 his whole career, but it seems that the establishment took him out and replaced him with an establishment guy. Carter is an aberration because he's a populist, but he didn't pose a threat to them. After that, you get Reagan with Bush as the vice president, you get Bush, Clinton, Bush, Obama, and you have the exact same foreign policy. It never changed. The presidents weren't calling the shots. When Trump comes along, he's a threat. And that's what we're dealing with today.

26:42 Excellent stuff. We're going to be right back as we continue to analyze these international banking systems and the private sector networks that are really in control of what we would all call the puppets, which are the office holders. We'll be back with Warhamster Brady. Send out the links.

27:00 It's the radio show all the social justice warriors are warning you about. It's also the radio show that the big tech companies wish they could censor. They wish they could censor the radio show because of content like we're having today with War Hamster Brady. He's on X at War underscore Hamster 1776. Brady and what we're doing, by the way, just connecting the ties that bind, talking about the real-life instances and people and networks between the international banking communities and the...

27:29 western intel agencies and these globalist oligarchs that are openly telling you what you're going to do they're going to bring sovereign nations under one world government control which is a global globalist technocracy it won't be communism it won't be socialism those are elements and tools they use it'll be a globalist technocracy a ruling of experts and experts and a scientific engineering of society like aldous huxley's brave new world

27:57 Warhamster Brady's bringing the receipts here. You were talking about the World Bank. You were talking about the ICSID and what was happening here with this decolonization that started to happen in the 1950s and how this international crime syndicate in the shadow government couldn't let sovereign nations just start to govern themselves or they would lose international control of the resources and the network that they were looking to build world government on. Please continue.

28:26 Yeah, so we're sitting here post-World War II, and most of the world outside the United States has been bombed to smithereens. Their industry is going to take years to rebuild. This is coming out of the worldwide Great Depression in the 30s. The concern in America, of course, is, well, now that the war industrial machine is no longer necessary, are we going to go back into recession or depression? It's perhaps likely, or do we have to find a way to prop up other...

28:56 economies around the world so we have somebody to buy our goods and services as the dominant, new dominant economy, because it was the only major developed country that never got bombed during the war. So it made a lot of sense to do the Marshall Plan and reconstruction. And that started out with the World Bank. They were giving loans. They were created to give loans to developing countries. One great example of what they do is the first loan they gave out in 1947 was to France for $250 million.

29:27 France wanted $500 million, but they got half of it. But to get the loan, they had to agree to conditions. Stop me if it sounds familiar. It's what we've done. They did this after the 2009 financial crisis. They ordered really hard conditions on countries like Poland. Italy did. Greece. That was a big one. The austerity demand. So the World Bank demanded that France had to have a balanced budget.

29:56 So the U.S. State Department got involved and said, well, the French government, it had to remove all its communist party members. They were using the financial leverage to determine political balances in other countries. Most of what the World Bank did was giving out loans to war-torn countries up until the 50s and stuff like that. The Marshall Plan came in, and they actually had a bigger amount of money to give out in a little bit different terms, but they were still working together.

30:27 In the 1970s, the World Bank starts focusing on developing world countries, and as you well know, that was abused. In South America and Africa, a lot of these countries were permanently bankrupted by the ruinous interest they had to pay on loans that they never should have taken out because they didn't have a developed economy to generate the revenue to pay them back. Again, it allowed for a confiscation of national resources, which was probably designed. Under Carter, the World Bank kind of changes and tries to...

30:55 be a little play a little bit nicer and make it up to these um countries that we've exploited for the lending but you know this is your socialist programs that ended up backfiring as well national product national uh projects that were not done we've done with inferior labor and you know cutting corners and too much graft off the top it's not well managed where things really change um let me take a step back of that um let's talk about the ists so what we have in 1953 is uh

31:27 Moshe of Iran had to get taken out by the CIA and MI6. Why did they do that? Because British petroleum had an oil interest there, and Moshe was nationalizing the oil, and that couldn't be allowed. So he got taken out. In 1954, the CIA took out the president of Guatemala. We all know about United Fruit. Yes, sir. It was redistributing land back to the peasants. This is land that, even if it's not being used, was owned by the United Fruits of the world. Wow.

31:57 That president, nationalist president, got taken out. In 1956, President Nasser of Egypt nationalized the Suez Canal. And what would happen after that is a quick invasion by France, the U.K., and Israel. So we can see this is a problem. And everyone realizes we're about to run into this problem. There's a German banker, former Nazi president, Herman Habs, that did a lot of work on this. And basically he says we're going to keep running into this problem. We need a legal system in place where we can exercise power above these local elected leaders.

32:29 Let that sink in. It's a legal system to supersede sovereign rights. That's right. So he also says we need a supernatural institution where investor rights can be enforced. He joins a British law of governance, Shawcross, that created the Ab-Shawcross draft convention. The World Bank likes the idea, and by 1966, they created the ICSID, the fifth arm of the World Bank. What is it? It's a way of enforcing corporate rule, but also a Cold War tool.

33:01 Its only justification is that it may be allowed for foreign investment. Foreign investors are not going to invest in a third-world country unless they have some protections. That's a reasonable argument. That's what they use to sugarcoat it. It insures corporations against political risk, which is the exact opposite of capitalism. And when sovereign nation states are considering domestic policy, they have to consider the risk of having an ISDS case brought against them, meaning I'm going to clean my waterways.

33:30 XYZ Chemical Company says, I'm not going to do that. It may cause my future investors some harm. And that international corporation will win in court. So you can't even fix your own country under these tariffs. What happens if you go against them? Any guesses? Yeah, you'll have NATO forces come against you to oust you, and it'll be also run on the ground in some...

33:55 made to look like some populist revolution against you that the CIA and MI6 will be running as some type of grassroots justification to remove you. Exactly right. And it doesn't matter if it's the State Department, NATO, or the CIA. In some way, shape, or form, you're going to run into trouble when you disobey these international laws. Yeah, George Soros...

34:20 George Soros, non-government organizations will come in and set up three media networks overnight with newscasts to look legitimate and all this stuff. Yeah, we've seen that playbook so many times. Once you know how to see it, it's really hard not to see it. Exactly. And it's also what makes it so frustrating that...

34:38 Your standard neocon, well, we know why standard neocon radio can't cover this stuff, Brady, but the reason why I take it so personally is because they're keeping our friends and family that would otherwise see it in the dark and stopping the mass noncompliance. That's really where they're hurting us. Going back to the ISP, we're going back to the world government. They tried to give us one world government after World War I with the League of Nations. That failed.

35:20 Yes, sir. And how they were doing that, because I am going to have to take a break right here before we come back for our final segment of the first hour. And once again, this was all...

35:31 with a new plan to not do something, not take over sovereign nations through a kinetic war that everybody would see. I mean, it's really taking a lot of this Fabian Society's model of permeation and building up networks so that you can execute leverage on sovereign nations and connect them without having to look like you're toppling them.

35:53 and building a one-world government, it seems. That's the ultimate goal of what all this stuff is being done. The World Bank and its separate, supranational legal system that it's run by and all that stuff.

36:05 It's the radio show for those citizens out there who are awake, not woke. It's a good fight with Jameson Haygood. We have War Hamster Brady here with us for the whole two hours. This is the final segment of the first hour with a whole other one ready to go. Brady, you've talked about, you've walked us through here the mid-20th century and the building of these, the reasons behind the World Bank, the influence between the Rockefeller Foundations and the Ford.

36:29 and how these Western intel agencies have come about to help the international syndicate and the shadow government and the international oligarchs control resources in other countries, justifying the overthrow of sovereign nations. And when you talk about any of these larger supranational institutions and roundtable groups like the UN or like the World Bank helping to rebuild war-torn countries, you say, well, man, those are some good causes.

36:58 and might have justified these institutions being built. And what I'm saying is anytime you center power in an international banking network with a few oligarchs, the pros that they might deliver and promise on never will outweigh the cons that the individual citizens will live under. What say you? That's exactly correct. And we were just talking about the World Bank.

37:30 had been switched a little bit in the 70s and 80s. In 1990, their entire focus changes. The whole strategy of the blob or the shadow state or the international syndicate, we've got to settle on one of these terms one of these days. I know. Which one do you like best? I've always used shadow state. Use that. Use that because that's your term, and you're right. Yes, sir. Well, things change. The Cold War is coming to an end. It's 1990, and you're about to see the implementation of the World Bank start to lend to these.

38:01 NGOs, environmental groups, to give us the appearance of good intentions. We know that after the fact, we've seen all these rent-a-riot color revolutions. Yes, sir. That was not the case. But it's really interesting, that entire international strategy changed right around 1990. Do you know who the U.S. Secretary of Defense was from 1993 when that happened? Was it James Baker? This would have been Dick Cheney, the one who just endorsed Kamala Harris. Okay.

38:31 Incredible. One of the major avatars of this neoconservative international cabal movement. Yeah, and his president was a guy by the name of George W. Bush who just happened to be the son of the former director of the CIA, who Dick Cheney also worked with and for. Yeah. These are the networks.

39:01 fully connected. We'll have the second hour as we start to continue to lay all this out. Hindsight's 2020 with War Hamster Brady up next. Well, like I said, Dick was sitting at the head of the table at the Department of Defense when the U.S.'s major, I should say the Western Alliance's major shift in strategy took place at the end of the Cold War. We previously justified all of our international escapades by saying we were defending against communism. Basically, NATO was...

39:34 quote-unquote defensive organization. Well, in 1998, they decided to go on offense, and they could not just start bombing the heck out of people. That's bad for business, and it's also pretty bad PR. The American public probably would not have stood for that. So they always had to have these justifications for our minor kinetic activities. Vietnam was so unpopular, there was like a 15-year gap before we did anything like that again. In 1990, we go on offense. It starts with the first Iraqi war.

40:03 By 1995, NATO, for the first time in history, was bombing Yugoslavia with a whole Serbia approachable, and that was absolutely manufactured by our State Department. The other really interesting thing that happened in 1990 was the privatization of the Internet. I'm not going to go too deep into that because it's a much longer conversation, but essentially what they realized they could do, what our intelligence teams realized they could do, is that they could influence, like with Radio Free Europe and other areas on the Internet,

40:33 other countries, they could actually help to promote alleged grassroots organizations on the street exactly as you described about the fake demonstrations as part of the color revolution. Well, the Internet was a major tool for that. And they would use it over and over again, all the way leading up to the Arab Spring. Of course, that changes after Brexit and Trump happened, and they switched to a position of free Internet to global censorship. And there's a reason for that. They lost control.

41:04 And without going into too much detail, I call what we're living through today, Gutenberg 2.0. Because for the first time in at least a century or more, the powers that be do not control what is spoken about and what is heard. And that's why they need a century. They've lost control. The genie's out of the bottle. And that's why it's so important people like you, Jameson, do what you do. As long as people can talk freely about these ideas, they can't shut us up. So keep on doing what you're doing. Thank you. Same to you, brother. Taking a step back.

41:36 create the whole power structure, international legal and financial and banking system that sits on top of everything. I think your friend Carol Quigley had a great quote, and it says, the power of financial capitalism had another far-reaching plan, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands, able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. Right, right. Can you repeat that?

42:05 Can you repeat that? And then I don't want to go off on too far of a tangent, but I want to ask you about Carol Quigley directly after that. Repeat that quote, please, one more time. Yes. The power of financial capitalism had another far-reaching plan, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands, able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. Where was that quote? Do you have the book that he wrote that, or is he just credited with that?

42:35 I don't mean to put you on the spot. I bet it is, too, which I haven't read. I have read the Anglo-American establishment. Either way, that one I have to go get back and get that on my play sheet. It is what we're seeing now, and it also confirms the fact that it's a really, really long, decades, 100-year plan, probably further than that. But that is incredible stuff right there. Now let me ask you real quick and state where you are. But my personal opinion of Dr. Carol Quigley is, though,

43:05 that he was a historian of this Anglo-American banking establishment, ruling elite, but he seems to not really be a, he seems to be an apologist for them or a defender. Do you know, what's your opinion of Carol Quigley? I seem to think that he is with them, but was just getting accurate historical scholarly accounts.

43:35 sources and referencing of this takeover. What's your opinion? Yes, sir. Yeah, when you read his work, it's so scholarly, I have to read each page.

44:05 And it's not just the names. It's, you know, it's one of those things I read each page two or three times. Seriously, it took me forever to get to the Anglo-American establishment. So do you think he was affirming this idea that we really do need to have supranational networks to build this utopia and actually to make the world safer? Do you think he was just kind of an objective historian of them? Well, he wrote a book called State Secrets. He'd already written it. It was already published by the time, you know, his success.

44:37 Okay. Yeah. Which he certainly did, and I don't even ever... That's interesting. I haven't read enough of him to fully develop my ideas, but I really appreciate you giving that idea. He's just an objective historian, because he is critical of them in the Anglo-American establishment. He's critical of some of the...

45:01 decisions they made that were actually successfully building world government. So that's very enlightening that most likely he was an objective historian not weighing in either way on this. Yeah. Okay. Just a quick tip for you and your listeners. Yes, sir. If you want to absorb it quickly in the best way, try the audiobook. It is easier than the 1,400-page tragedy and hope.

45:31 Right. I have not tackled that one. I almost, though, want to do that. I have so much reading I need to do before that. I almost want to do it just to be able to legitimately say I did it. And I guess that's more of a prideful thing, not that it would make me any smarter. Please continue with where you were in that process, Brady, laying this out. Well, yeah, I wanted to jump into the other real big players, and that's the Bank of International Settlements. Yes, sir.

45:59 The best way to describe the bank, the BIS, is that they're the central bank, central banker's central bank. They're a clearinghouse for all kinds of things, for clearing of metals, currencies, all kinds of trades. If you go to BIS.org, you will find an incredible database. They've got the international derivative settlements. You'll find there's over $600 trillion of outstanding interest rate swaps, which is, you know, we almost crashed the world economy.

46:27 derivatives in 2009 on credit default swaps, whatever. This is 30 times bigger. That puts you at risk with the financialization at all points in the BIS. As we sit right now, these bets, not only on stocks and bonds and treasuries, but secondary bets between two different or more parties on what those stocks are going to do are in the trillions, to be real simple, is what you're saying. The global stock market is worth somewhere between $500 and $600 trillion today.

46:56 Right. The derivatives, the financialization, the secured instruments are worth about 10 times that. That is just incredible to know. A figment of our imagination. They're not real assets. They are bets on what the stock market can do, among other things. I'm certainly not a financial expert. You've been on Wall Street. That alone, you don't even have to know the details of what all the derivatives market is to know that 10 times the actual stock market.

47:26 is over here in some side bets and some new creations of debt, and debt is collateral and all this stuff. Absolutely way worse than a house of cards has been now set up. Yeah, and I'll make the case that there's a legitimate use for derivatives for hedging and monetization purposes. They actually do serve a good purpose. They just get abused. And there is not adequate risk controls in place, and the amount of risk is more than systemic.

47:53 Right. If something goes wrong, if interest rates move unexpectedly, counterparty risk soars, you can see banks failing everywhere overnight. That's the risk. Yeah, and they can work. Right there, can we, and they can work outside of this regulation because they're the ones writing the regulation, right? Is it back to the international shadow state, the international banking system that really controls the laws? Is that how they're able to do that? Well, absolutely. I don't remember.

48:20 of Congress ever ratifying anything like this. I don't remember a constitutional amendment. Right, right, right. So how did the BIS form this? In 1931, there's something called the Hague Agreement, where six nations formed it. Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the UK. You know who's missing from there? The United States. Absolutely. But you know who was there? There were three international banks from the U.S. J.P. Morgan and Company, and First National Bank of New York and Chicago. They were part of that.

48:53 About 13.7% of all the BIS original shares were in private hands. That's important. It was not just a public thing. They were private. Here's where it gets fun. You want to know how you know you're above sovereign nations? Tell me. You get carve-outs. So BIS, basically, politicians are being indeed with contempt. What they got were the following benefits.

49:26 the Bank of International Settlements, to someone like Alan Greenspan. You have immunity from arrest or imprisonment, immunity from seizure of a personal baggage, saving plagiarization of criminal offense, inviolability of all of their papers and documents, immunity from jurisdiction, even after their mission has been accomplished, for acts carried out in discharge of their duties, including words spoken and writings. And my favorite is exemption from selling their spouses and children from any immigration restrictions, from any formalities.

49:56 returning the registration of aliens and from any obligation relating to national service. That sounds like somebody who's above the law. No doubt. No doubt. Matter of fact, we've seen Alan Greenspan. I don't know. You'll probably be familiar with this famous quote. It was on TV. He was being interviewed, and he said, the federal government doesn't oversee our Federal Reserve. Basically, I'm paraphrasing, but he said, we don't answer to anybody. And he was just talking about the Federal Reserve, not even the central bank of the Federal Reserve.

50:28 Like the BIS? No, they don't. Ostensibly, the president nominates the heads of each of the New York Federal Reserve member banks, but they're still private entities. There's about five different lists I found on the Internet showing exactly who owns the Federal Reserve. I don't even think G. Edward Griffin knows for sure what the actual original makeup was. Some of these websites are not what you call the most reputable, but suffice it to say it is true that the Federal Reserve is owned by private banks.

50:57 And as Mr. Griffin likes to say, you know Griffin, they call it the Federal Reserve Private Bank. It's not federal. There are no reserves. Federal Reserve Banking System is not federal. There are no reserves. It's not a bank, and there is no system. That's it. I tell you what, we're off and running. Let's take the break here so we can stay on time. We've now moved into the Bank for International Settlements as Warhamster Brady works through this international banking system that we live under that really is the

51:29 And it's really the government, which why on this show, when I refer to government, I am not just referring to state elected and unelected. I am referring to the private sector international banking system and that leverage over your life blended with the state that equals the full realm of government in your life. War hamster Brady, when we return.

51:55 We are destroying globalist and cultural Marxist arguments a lot like what happens when a snake gets caught in a lawnmower. We're doing it right here in a good fight on 103.9 WYAB. We have War Hamster Brady, War underscore Hamster 1776 on X on Rumble at War Hamster. We're talking about the International Crime Syndicate, the Shadow State, the International Banking Corporations working with the Western Intel Agencies. It's all the same thing.

52:21 And that is the government Western civilization now lives under. Hindsight's 20-20. Brady's helping us look into all this. Brady, you've made your way up into the Bank for International Settlements. It's interesting. When you talked about the countries that made up this Bank for International Settlements, what's also known as the Central Bank of the Central Banks, you talked about the different countries that were present there. Did you say 1931?

52:50 That's what the Hague Agreement was, yeah. Okay, and then you said, well, what's interesting was the United States was missing there, but how convenient J.P. Morgan interests are there, other interests of the Federal Reserve were there, not unlike when the Federal Reserve was founded and we had the J.P. Morgan interest there, we had the Rockefeller interest, we had Warburg representing, Paul Warburg representing the Rothschilds, and this same banking...

53:19 entities that were competitors meeting to now become cartel members working together to control international resources, global resources, and also at the same time, some elements at the top, building world government. Please continue. Yeah, you said it exactly right again. Thank you, sir. You know, this is no different. This playbook is exactly like the British East India Company used 400 years ago. It's just what Sullivan and Cromwell were doing at the beginning of the 20th century privately.

53:49 If the multinational corporations' business interests are at risk, they're going to give a call to their friends at the blob, the Pentagon, the CIA, and the State Department, and they will figure out a way to protect those interests. And all these international institutions are completely extra-constitutional, like the Bank of International Settlements, leading the way and making it seem all legal. And you also saw this in 1990. They started saying, everything we're doing internationally, we've got to protect.

54:19 democracy. Right, right. And that was such, we can justify anything now in the name of democracy. It doesn't matter if we're the bad guys or not. If we say we're protecting democracy, you'll get public support. And of course, the media goes right along with it. And politicians on both sides of the aisle, you know, we saw in Gulf War II, you know, it was bipartisan to go after Saddam Hussein because of his fake weapons of mass destruction. So you've got politicians on both sides of the aisle don't ask questions. Right. It's problematic.

54:51 Yeah, and you and I now know, once again with hindsight being 20-20, we know what they mean when they say democracy. Here in the West, the Western intel agencies, the international corporations and the State Department, when they say democracy, they mean installing a regime.

55:07 that will sign on to their form of world government, UN Agenda 2030, the radical liberal social programs, and the central banking creating fiat currency out of thin air to control it all. That's their idea of democracy. Oh, by the way, your agriculture is controlled out of Davos in Washington, D.C., in Silicon Valley. Your energy policy is controlled out of the Council on Foreign Relations, the Royal Institute of International Affairs, this type of stuff.

55:35 That when they say democracy, that's what they mean. They certainly do not mean the will of the people. Well, of course not. That's why they always topple the populist leaders. The people will actually, any leader on the left or the right. Yes, sir. That becomes a nationalist, ends up trying to kick these, you know, if you're for the people, you're going to kick these international organizations out. And I can't stand. That's exactly right. They will find a reason to come against you if they have to create their own incident.

56:01 under a false flag or if they have to create their own astroturfed grassroots resistance against it with a George Soros NGO, they will do it. And then, of course, they'll say they're doing the will of the people when it's the exact opposite of the will of the people or the will of the people have been manipulated. But all across Europe right now, we're seeing they're understanding that they're no longer under control of their own agriculture, their own energy. And it's this populist resistance is.

56:31 That's why we see this clash of your shadow state that you're talking about and the foreign policy blob that Mike Benz has laid out and you've laid out so well and the people. That's the clash we're seeing just show itself so evident right now. Exactly. Have you heard of a gentleman by the name of Patrick Wood? He's an author. Oh, yes, sir. And I've read several of his books on technocracy. And I've read Trilaterals Over Washington. Yes, sir.

57:02 him to the audience a little bit more because he's important. I'm going to read his summary of BIS, but you need to know who this guy is. The best way to find him is to look for Catherine Alton Fitz. She does a number of video interviews with him, and they're both fantastic on this stuff. He's described as the leading and critical expert on sustainable development, green economy, Agenda 21, 2030 agenda, and historic technocracy. Author of Technocracy Rising, which you said you've read, and he also...

57:30 Interestingly, he was a co-author of a book called Trilaterals Over Washington, which he co-wrote with Anthony C. Sutton, who is one of the legends in our movement. Incredible. Yes, sir. I'm so glad you brought him up. Matter of fact, a quick plug, and I want you to keep going. Technocracy.news is his website that is just incredible. Yeah, he's one of the best sources out there. When I put this radio show to video in the next few days,

57:58 I will put links at the bottom of my Rumble channel to all of these authors and things we're talking about. Thank you, sir. So Patrick Wood does a huge investigation on the BIS, and he goes, our credo is follow the money, follow the power. This report has endeavored to follow the money. Here's what we found about the Bank of International Settlements. There's about eight bullet points. I'm just going to go through them, jump in wherever you want. Yes, sir. The BIS is central bank to all major central banks in the world.

58:27 It is privately owned by central banks themselves, most of which are also private. It was founded under questionable circumstances by questionable people. I love that quote. I do, too. It says it is accountable to no one, especially government bodies. It operates in complete secrecy and is inviolable. Movement of money is obscured and hidden when routed to the BIS. The BIS is targeting regional currency blocks and ultimately a global currency. You know about that. Mm-hmm.

59:02 It's been hugely successful in building the new international economic order, along with its attendant initiatives of global governance, which is all we hear from these globalists. And he says, as we follow the power, another paper will more fully explore the influence and power that the IAS exerts over other banks, nations, and governments. And he leaves us with Proverbs 22.7. The rich rule over the poor, and the borrower is servant to the lender. Incredible.

59:35 That is the model that we've now seen come to full fruition. And as we talk about it, it's been decades, if not centuries, that work together to this point. Please keep going. The last little connection I'd like to bring up is we've lived through the 90s, 2000s. Most of us have lived through what the Bushes, Obamas, and Clintons have done with their international, not their foreign policy, but the ones they rubber-stamped. Right.

1:00:09 They're still at this today, because it's very day. They're still trying to find ways to finance everything under the sun that's not nailed down. Are you familiar with a concept called the natural asset company? No, I'm not, but let's do that right here. The natural asset company, you said? Yep. This is a perfect place to stop to come back for another long segment. We have War Hamster Brady here laying it out. Why did we see that we...

1:00:38 We really don't get to govern ourselves. And by the way, even across Europe and socialist nations, they're rioting, proving that they are not able to govern themselves. Well, it's because of this international banking syndicate, this shadow state that's been set up in a 100-year-plus plan right before us. We'll be back with Brady.

1:01:04 We're exercising every single one of our God given rights right here in a good fight with Jameson. Hey, good. We have war hamster Brady here with us all day today looking at part two of the International Crime Syndicate, which is the alliance between the State Department bureaucracies, the Western Intel agencies and the international banking apparatus. All well, the Western Intel, by the way.

1:01:33 agencies corrupt from inception uh brady before we left you were talking about you had moved to i believe the acronym was the ncs can you n-a-c national i'm sorry company n-a-c thank you please go and you've i've not heard of this the national asset company not to get it right it's a natural asset company natural that's right financializing

1:02:00 Natural resources. I got it. That's my fault. I said it wrong first. And I'm tracking with this idea. By the way, I'm reading The Open Conspiracy by H.G. Wells right now. It's a short little read. I'm just slowly going through it, marking it up. And even he talks about everything naturally being.

1:02:24 tracked and resources being tracked. And now we know some of the great work that Whitney Webb has done with this unified ledger of assets of every natural thing on the planet being listed as an asset and how they're going to use that. I believe it ties into that, the NAC. This is their world technocratic plan. Yes, sir. Yes, sir. Yeah, Whitney Webb, she's a great source on this stuff. Her Unlimited Hangout has a ton of articles on the NACs. And I think...

1:02:54 You know, thanks to her work and a bunch of others who sounded the alarm on this. Well, let me tell you the story. Yes, sir. And we'll thank her after. Thank you. So this is September of 2021, three years ago. The New York Stock Exchange announces it's got a new asset class, an accompanying listing vehicle. And in their filing, this is the exact quote, it says, to preserve and restore the natural assets that ultimately underpin the ability for there to be life on Earth. I ask you, Jameson, what is the New York Stock Exchange?

1:03:24 change doing getting involved in social issues or environmental right it's just amazing it's obviously they're doing it's rhetorical i'll answer it right right it's um you know obviously they're trying to do it under the guise of sustainability or you know all these feel good things but essentially what they're trying to do is financialize natural resources the air you breathe the water you drink any of the resources trees you name it and with um

1:03:54 What the CEO said was, I'm sorry, the CEO got the name Michael Blauground, that our hope is that owning a natural asset company is going to be a way that an increasingly broad range of investors have the ability to invest in something that's intrinsically valuable, but up until this point was really excluded from the financial markets. There's a lot going on there with what he's trying to do. To break that down, you probably need to know who's involved. One of the groups that helped...

1:04:27 This idea with the New York Stock Exchange is called the IEG, the Intrinsic Exchange Group. And just so you know, their investors are the IDB. That's the Inter-American Development Metal Bank. That's an NGO. The New York Stock Exchange and, of course, our good friends at the Rockefeller Foundation. It really is not about conserving natural assets. It's about monetizing them. It's like building a bigger casino. And I bring that up. We talked earlier about what is about a $500 trillion market right now for securities.

1:05:01 If they were to take these NACs and apply them to every natural resource on the planet, you're talking about 800% figure, a $4 quadrillion market. Right. So that's what they want to do. Right. So you need new things to monetize the value of, to basically lend against and take control over. I don't know all the ways they want to do it, but it would be every single river. So here, just a random, you know, the Yazoo River itself will be monetized.

1:05:31 given a value and you can kind of invest in it or you know it's added to the financial ledger i mean it just it's it's confusing but you can what it is 100 proof for uh before i let you continue it is that we when we talk about this idea of global scientific engineering

1:05:56 Through the banking system, it's more proof that they're doing what they say they're going to do. That is the plan. That's the main thing to take away from this, that they are doing what they're saying they're going to do. And this is just further proof of it. Yeah, 100%. When somebody tells you who they are, you probably ought to believe them. So the other organization pushing this is called GFANS, G-F-A-N-S-E. It's the Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero. Another one of their lovely buzzwords is Net Zero. And who launches that?

1:06:26 I don't know, John Kerry, Janet Yellen, Mark Carney, the former chair of the Bank of England. Currently, Carney and Berg, all the same names over and over again, but they created some other subsectors, alliances. They have the Net Zero Asset Managers Initiative. What does that mean? All these acronyms. Net Zero Asset Owner Alliance. They're lobbying before this thing even exists. And they also have, my favorite one is the,

1:07:00 the net zero banking alliance, which actually controls 43% of all global banking assets. That's who's after this, a huge chunk of the inside players. And when we mean net zero, when they mean net zero, they're talking about the net zero carbon plan, which not only is impossible to do, but it also is openly anti-real science and anti-God as carbon.

1:07:28 is what life is based off on. And by the way, here on this show, we are very open about the fact that we don't need less CO2 as a molecule out there. We need more CO2 to help life grow and flourish. That is the science of it. But they're using science. This is the idea of technocracy. Scientific, justifying your society's engineering based off of the science. It happens to be their rigged fake science. That's the net zero they mean. Yeah, I'm in the right place.

1:07:58 100% correct. I could not have said that better myself. Thank you, sir. You want to wrap up with the top financial players behind us and G fans. You're going to hear some familiar names. BlackRock, Citibank, my former employer, Bank of America, Bank of Santander, the big money laundering bank, HSBC, it keeps popping up. And of course, anybody who follows me knows what's coming next. The David Rockefeller Fund. Wow.

1:08:30 So that's who was trying to put this in place. And, you know, it'll be the same hidden hand. If a nation goes against these policies, they'll get taken out by, you know, color revolution or what have you. You notice all over the world, we've got the military borders and prisons have all been privatized for profit. You go back to September 10th, right before 9-11, the day before. So basically exactly 23 years ago today, Donald Rumsfeld gave the speech on how the Department of Defense

1:09:03 In 2007 and 2008, there were more private contractors working for the Department of Defense than there were enlisted personnel. In many countries, you've got private security that outnumbers the police, and they're better armed. And the best thing they do about all this privatization is you can't send a FOIA request to a private company, so it's a lot easier to hide their atrocities. Incredible. Incredible. Yeah, and how convenient on the economic side. Yes, sir. Yes, sir. Please go.

1:09:30 up on the NACs and then we can just Q&A the last little bit. The good news is that last year the New York Stock Exchange pulled the application for NACs. It is no longer on the table. They're going back to draft something else. We actually thought this went off for now. Okay. Repeat what you said one more time. Yeah. This whole bid for the NACs, the New York Stock Exchange, they pulled their application to create a new asset class.

1:09:58 There's enough pushback that we've won this time. This is not going forward. It is getting cobwebs. It's been mothballed for now. And, of course, it'll do like they did when you saw Larry Fink at BlackRock come out about environmental social governance. They don't do away with their plan. They just dissolve it for a little bit and bring it back under a new name. That's exactly correct. Let me tell you, since you hit BlackRock, here's another fun one. It's a whole other show to talk about this.

1:10:29 People talk about all the time how BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard own like 20% of all publicly traded companies. Well, that's technically not true. They vote the shares of the beneficial owners of the funds that they manage. That's called voting proxies. If you go into a brokerage account and you buy 100 shares of IBM, you have to click a box whether you want to vote your own proxy shares or not. That voting power is one of the benefits of ownership. Through SEC and congressional legislation, these fund managers have assumed.

1:10:59 Your interest, your voting interest in the stocks, you are actually the beneficial owner. And that can be switched legislatively, and it can be done tomorrow. And there's at least four state attorney generals that are working on this. So that whole BlackRock, Vanguard, State Street dominance, and being able to impose their ESG rules on corporations all around America, that may be coming to an end.

1:11:21 That's a great note to take a break on because once again, this is when we have people like you on and we're just now we're at the point in the takeover. We're analyzing the reality of the situation, which is up to date information that we do need to know in order to know how to prepare and how to act in the future.

1:11:39 As I say, it seems like Doomer type stuff. It's really just analyzing the reality of the situation just the same way you would in some type of a sports ball game where you would try to analyze how far are we behind or where are we at in the game so we know what move to make next. That's what we're doing, but that's a great...

1:11:56 element to go to break on there brady as you talk about look there are ways to push back on and they're back this international syndicate is definitely they have their back against the wall or they wouldn't be acting as you know wild and reckless as they are acting so they're not god even though they believe they're a god and there are ways for the people to come out of this as victors victors we will have the final segment with war hamster brady when we get back

1:12:26 It is psychological inoculation against globalist propaganda, and you can get your daily dose or shot or vaccine right here in a good fight on 103.9 WYAB. Hey, this daily psychological inoculation is safe and effective, not like the poisonous and ineffective COVID-19 bioweapons that are still out there on the market that we rail against and expose daily until all of our loved ones and friends are safe from these.

1:12:56 That is a side note. Brady, you might not want to put that on the old YouTube there, but I will stand behind that statement. Brady, you've done incredible. You've been so gracious with your time. You've talked to me off the air and been gracious with your time there, helped answer a lot of questions that I have about what's going on with the history of our banking system and the Western Intel agencies that we're living under.

1:13:19 right now. Can you say, repeat one more time with just 30 seconds or a minute of really what we're seeing now, this new transition into the mid-1900s where they decided to set up institutions to get leverage over nations without having to look like they were invading them and doing it through kinetic military operations. Can you kind of reiterate that or smooth that out for me?

1:13:45 Well, it's a near bloodless coup by multinational corporations. They've infiltrated every institution around the Western countries and around the world. It's soft power, but they basically have more control than any entity has ever had in human history. It's a modern technocratic version of the British Empire. Incredible stuff. That makes so much sense out of what we're seeing.

1:14:09 All around us right now. And it's also the reason why we keep warning people do not get caught into the red versus blue, donkeys versus elephants dialectic. There is a uniparty group of puppets out there representing their special interests that own them. By the way, it's made fully evident now by Dick Cheney coming out and verbally, audibly endorsing Kamala Harris. Of course, because they have the same bunch behind both people.

1:14:36 proving we're exactly right. Warhamster Brady, share all the ways that we can stay in touch with you. It's war underscore hamster 1776. Truth Social is war underscore hamster. Best way to get my best content is on Rumble and War Space Hamster. Please like, subscribe, follow, all that good stuff. This video, the recording we did two weeks ago, I put into a video series. I turned the radio sharing, put some pictures and graphics with it.

1:15:06 And it is the ninth of my The Shadow State series called The Ties Between Banking and Intelligence. The show we're doing today, I'll be out on the channel in a few days with illustration. But if you like this content, look for The Shadow State stuff. That's really where I get into the cloak and dagger. Yes, that's what I'm going to go back to. I'm going to go back and consume all of the stuff. Part of that series is called The Shadow State. Once again, I am sure honored to be a small part of that. And then, like I said, this having.

1:15:35 resources like you out there that have been on the front lines on wall street now coming back looking at the history of it connecting the ties that bind of really what we're living under is priceless to wake up the normies around us war hamster brady we will see you down the road i look forward to having you on again thanks for having me jason there you go meet me here tomorrow

Entities here

John J. McCloy21 World Bank15 United States12 C. Wright Mills9 Bank for International Settlements9 World War II8 United States Department of Defense6 France6 Rockefeller Foundation5 CFR4 Dick Cheney4 Japan4 George H.W. Bush4 International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes4 West Germany4 North Atlantic Treaty Organization4 Reinhard Gehlen4 War Department4 Douglas MacArthur3 Allen Dulles3 New York Stock Exchange3 Warren Commission3 BlackRock3 William J. Donovan3 Anglo-American Establishment3 Federal Reserve3 Patrick Wood3 Ford Foundation3 Operation Gladio2 U.S. State Department2 Bretton Woods Agreement2 Henry Stimson2 Edward Griffin2 Donald Trump2 Switzerland2 Robert Kennedy assassination2 Jimmy Carter2 First National Bank of Chicago2 Operation Golden Lily2 Richard Nixon2

Claims made here

John Foster Dulles headed U.S. State Department host_asserted ▶ 2:12

“The head of the CIA was Alan Dulles, and his brother, John Foster Dulles, was at the time the head of the State Department. And it's no coincidence. Mike Benz, you can find him at Mike Benz' site arou…”

John J. McCloy member_of War Department host_asserted ▶ 5:08

“corporations in the world throughout history, the same one that Alan Dulles represented. And so that's what he's doing for most of the 30s, working in private law, international banking. World War II …”

John J. McCloy funded Operation Golden Lily host_asserted ▶ 8:40

“This stolen loot, and the Anderson Trust exists to this day. Most researchers will tell you this is a big nest egg of the off-the-books treasury of the CIA and other intelligence operations. It all co…”

John J. McCloy headed West Germany host_asserted ▶ 10:40

“McCloy's next tour of duty is the governor general of Germany, post-World War II reconstructed Germany. And the time he was there was interesting because it's right there in the Nuremberg trials. He w…”

John J. McCloy pardoned Reinhard Gehlen host_asserted ▶ 10:40

Reinhard Gehlen member_of Operation Gladio host_asserted ▶ 10:40

John J. McCloy headed Ford Foundation host_asserted ▶ 11:43

“I'm going to skip one of his next things he does, because then he goes back to his private life. And he would work for the chairman of Chase Manhattan Bank, and that's a big position. When you say Cha…”

John J. McCloy member_of Rockefeller Foundation host_asserted ▶ 11:43

John J. McCloy headed CFR host_asserted ▶ 11:43

Earl Warren headed Warren Commission host_asserted ▶ 12:13

“For 17 years. We already talked about how the CFR is probably the entity most responsible for calling the shots at the CIA. That's how important this guy was. What gets really funny, the one part I sk…”

Allen Dulles member_of Warren Commission host_asserted ▶ 12:13

Gerald Ford member_of Warren Commission host_asserted ▶ 13:24

“The other people on the Warren Commission, of course, we had two indiscriminate congressmen and two senators, one of which was Gerald Ford. Gerald Ford would end up being an unelected president of the…”

John J. McCloy member_of Warren Commission host_asserted ▶ 13:24

John J. McCloy headed World Bank host_asserted ▶ 13:24

John J. McCloy recruited Reinhard Gehlen host_asserted ▶ 17:09

“Then pick out people of the Nazi regime that would be important to this international crime syndicate, this international banking cabal, to be able to keep the Nazi stay-behind networks and spy networ…”

Reinhard Gehlen member_of NATO host_asserted ▶ 17:38

“Later, Galen is a major part, if not running, the NATO networks. NATO, run by a real-life Nazi, once again, because they didn't free Europe. They just kept the networks in place in order to make sure …”

John J. McCloy headed Chase Manhattan Bank host_asserted ▶ 18:06

“save Reinhard Galen and put him in power in NATO, he later becomes, this John J. McCloy, becomes the chairman of Chase Manhattan Bank, the Rockefeller Institution.…”

John J. McCloy covered_up Robert Kennedy assassination host_asserted ▶ 18:45

“And when he is the president of the World Bank. Now, what would the president of the World Bank need to be doing on the Warren Commission looking into or we should say covering up the JFK assassinatio…”

United States funded World Bank host_asserted ▶ 21:46

“The UK went from being the big brother to the little brother, but the Anglo-American alliance never changed. They joined together with about four or five other European nations, France, West Germany. …”

France carried_out_attack Egypt host_asserted ▶ 31:57

“That president, nationalist president, got taken out. In 1956, President Nasser of Egypt nationalized the Suez Canal. And what would happen after that is a quick invasion by France, the U.K., and Isra…”

Gamal Abdel Nasser targeted_for_regime_change Suez Canal host_asserted ▶ 31:57

Israel carried_out_attack Egypt host_asserted ▶ 31:57

Herman Habs founded International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes host_asserted ▶ 32:29

“Let that sink in. It's a legal system to supersede sovereign rights. That's right. So he also says we need a supernatural institution where investor rights can be enforced. He joins a British law of g…”

David Maxwell Fyfe founded International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes host_asserted ▶ 32:29

World Bank founded International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes host_asserted ▶ 32:29

United States carried_out_attack Iraq host_asserted ▶ 39:34

“quote-unquote defensive organization. Well, in 1998, they decided to go on offense, and they could not just start bombing the heck out of people. That's bad for business, and it's also pretty bad PR. …”

North Atlantic Treaty Organization carried_out_attack Yugoslavia host_asserted ▶ 40:03

“By 1995, NATO, for the first time in history, was bombing Yugoslavia with a whole Serbia approachable, and that was absolutely manufactured by our State Department. The other really interesting thing …”

C. Wright Mills founded Anglo-American Establishment host_asserted ▶ 42:35

“I don't mean to put you on the spot. I bet it is, too, which I haven't read. I have read the Anglo-American establishment. Either way, that one I have to go get back and get that on my play sheet. It …”

C. Wright Mills founded State Secrets: A History of the United States Government's Secret Relations with Foreign Powers host_asserted ▶ 44:05

“And it's not just the names. It's, you know, it's one of those things I read each page two or three times. Seriously, it took me forever to get to the Anglo-American establishment. So do you think he …”

C. Wright Mills founded Tragedy and Hope host_asserted ▶ 45:01

“decisions they made that were actually successfully building world government. So that's very enlightening that most likely he was an objective historian not weighing in either way on this. Yeah. Okay…”

Italy founded Bank for International Settlements host_asserted ▶ 48:20

“of Congress ever ratifying anything like this. I don't remember a constitutional amendment. Right, right, right. So how did the BIS form this? In 1931, there's something called the Hague Agreement, wh…”

Japan founded Bank for International Settlements host_asserted ▶ 48:20

France founded Bank for International Settlements host_asserted ▶ 48:20

First National Bank of Chicago member_of Bank for International Settlements host_asserted ▶ 48:20

J.P. Morgan & Co. member_of Bank for International Settlements host_asserted ▶ 48:20

Belgium founded Bank for International Settlements host_asserted ▶ 48:20

West Germany founded Bank for International Settlements host_asserted ▶ 48:20

Paul Warburg member_of Federal Reserve host_asserted ▶ 52:50

“That's what the Hague Agreement was, yeah. Okay, and then you said, well, what's interesting was the United States was missing there, but how convenient J.P. Morgan interests are there, other interest…”

J.P. Morgan member_of Bank for International Settlements host_asserted ▶ 52:50

Paul Warburg member_of Rothschild family host_asserted ▶ 52:50

Patrick Wood founded Trilaterals Over Washington documented ▶ 57:30

“Interestingly, he was a co-author of a book called Trilaterals Over Washington, which he co-wrote with Anthony C. Sutton, who is one of the legends in our movement. Incredible. Yes, sir. I'm so glad y…”

Antony Sutton founded Trilaterals Over Washington documented ▶ 57:30

New York Stock Exchange funded Intrinsic Exchange Group host_asserted ▶ 1:04:27

“This idea with the New York Stock Exchange is called the IEG, the Intrinsic Exchange Group. And just so you know, their investors are the IDB. That's the Inter-American Development Metal Bank. That's …”

Rockefeller Foundation funded Intrinsic Exchange Group host_asserted ▶ 1:04:27

Inter-American Development Bank funded Intrinsic Exchange Group host_asserted ▶ 1:04:27

John Kerry founded Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero host_asserted ▶ 1:06:26

“I don't know, John Kerry, Janet Yellen, Mark Carney, the former chair of the Bank of England. Currently, Carney and Berg, all the same names over and over again, but they created some other subsectors…”

Janet Yellen founded Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero host_asserted ▶ 1:06:26

Mark Carney founded Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero host_asserted ▶ 1:06:26

Donald Rumsfeld headed United States Department of Defense documented ▶ 1:08:30

“So that's who was trying to put this in place. And, you know, it'll be the same hidden hand. If a nation goes against these policies, they'll get taken out by, you know, color revolution or what have …”

Dick Cheney appointed Kamala Harris host_asserted ▶ 1:14:09

“All around us right now. And it's also the reason why we keep warning people do not get caught into the red versus blue, donkeys versus elephants dialectic. There is a uniparty group of puppets out th…”