The Shadow State 68 Fabian Socialists Pt. 1

1:05:37 · recorded 2026-05-08 · ▶ watch on Rumble

auto-scroll word highlight ▶ Rumble @ here

Transcript

0:19 more hamster brady bringing you all of the hidden history that no one wants you to know it's a good description i like it it's not that well hidden it's there in plain sight you just got to know what to look for and where to look for it it's hidden in the academic educational realm it's hidden in the media realm and by lack of not it's not that it's not there to your point

0:50 It's that no one ever talks about it. And the truth that they do talk about, it rhymes with the truth, but it's not the truth. They come close enough that maybe we'll pay a little lip service to what the real truth is. But they tell you A story, not B story. Well, and to your point, I think it's funny because when you start talking to people nowadays about this topic, they'll throw out.

1:19 you know, Sol Alinsky's Rule for Radicals. They'll throw out the Cloward and Piven without any understanding that that is a repackaged version of the Fabian society. They didn't come up with any of those ideas. No, and the Fabians, and that's what really we're going to talk about today, because we are starting our long-awaited series on the Fabian socialists, and it's fundamentally important. Why is it so important, Colonel? Well...

1:48 Because literally everything we're seeing today is downstream of the Fabian societies in their own words describing the gradualism, the gradual time-phased march to one world government. Yes, absolutely.

2:17 We'll back that up with some actual quotes from them. This is going to be a pretty long series. And we're not going to go, you know, you basically said everything happening today. The Fabian Society is the foundations of that. Today, we're going to go into the philosophical foundations of the Fabians themselves. I want to really set the foundation of the foundation underlying. Let's see. I think we should start with who the Fabians are. And I got some different quotes on this.

2:50 First of all, it's a socialist society founded in 1884 in London. And Britannica describes it as this. It says the Fabian Society was founded in 1884 in London, having as its goal the establishment of a democratic socialist state in Great Britain. Of course, they didn't just stay in Britain. The Fabians put their faith in evolutionary socialism rather than revolution.

3:19 And that's really the key point, because these are not, you know, people say, you know, these are communists and Marxists, and there's a difference. Marxists wanted immediate violent revolution, and the Fabians wanted a slow evolutionary socialism, as they would infiltrate all of our institutions, which they've been doing for over a century. The Wikipedia describes it as a British socialist organization whose purpose is to advance the principles of, here's the key words, social democracy.

3:49 and democratic socialism via gradualist and reformist effort in democracies rather than by revolutionary overthrow. It's related to radicalism, which we can get into. Yeah, we should do this. There's a book called The Fabian Freeway. Let's see if I can find it real quick. While you're doing that, I do want to put something out there. There actually is a precursor.

4:20 to the fabian society that i ran across it's actually called the fellowship of the new life and that actually is the predecessor to the baby in society and one of the things it also was called the guild of the new life i.e um the masonic overtones and why would that be because the guy that set up

4:50 The Fellowship in 1882 was a guy that was a Scottish American, not even making this up, Scottish American philosopher by the name of Thomas Davidson. And that's really, really important to understand because as we go through this series, you're going to find, we'll have a whole part.

5:20 on the masonic because it comes in much later on with the p2 lodge and stuff like that um and so i want to just kind of set the stage um with that pre-step to the fabian society because it's going to be a reoccurring thing yeah and it's note that there's some very cultish undertones to those groups yes without a doubt

5:44 So one of the best books on the Fabians is written in 1966. It's called The Fabian Freeway, The High Road to Socialism in the USA, written by Rose L. Martin. I've got it up. I've got the e-book. I forgot who is one of your followers asked me about it yesterday. I forgot that I was already reading it. But there's a summary I got of this, just a one paragraph summary about what the book's about. It says that Martin argues that Fabian socialism, a gradualist.

6:12 air quote respectable non-revolutionary form of socialism poses a greater long-term threat to american liberty and constitutional government than overt communism the book says fabians advance their goals stealthily through infiltration of education media government and elite networks using the motto festina lente or make haste slowly symbolized by a tortoise

6:43 Turtle always wins the race, right? The book claims this movement has effectively reversed the American Revolutionary's principles of limited government and individual freedom, pushing the U.S. towards centralized collectivism. That paragraph right there sums up pretty much my entire thesis of everything we've talked about. And as it points out, it's much more lethal. And it makes you wonder.

7:13 If the because going back to Anthony Sutton and the whole funding of all of the different variations of the violent piece of it, whether it's fascism or communism, weren't done along the way as a distraction because all of the efforts in America and all of the stealing of our wealth has been focused on those while the wolf in sheep's clothing, which is the Fabian.

7:43 This motto has not been actively working in our country while we were focused on these other diversions. You want to pull up my screen real quick? Sure. Yeah, this is the wolf in sheep's clothing, their original emblem, which is basically what they were doing is we're going to pretend to be these good, kind Democrats. And we're going to work on social problems as they weasel their way into every single one of our institutions. And if you notice the parallel, when we went through Skull and Bones and the Secret Societies.

8:14 they do the same thing these people are fabians that that's what we've been describing for the last couple years they uh changed their um emblem to the turtle when i strike i strike hard so basically what they're saying we just wait in the weeds wait in the weeds and when it's time to implement our one world government and do the great reset you better freaking look out and they're close and we saw them strike during covet

8:45 And that's a very interesting juxtaposition between the wolf in sheep's clothing, which is true, and the turtle, which is true. They are literally both of those things. Yeah. And they think of the timeline that's centuries long. They are patient. They think in generational terms, whereas most of us are just worried about the midterms. Correct. And that's pretty hard to compete with.

9:15 two steps forward, one step back. That's what they've been doing. That's why they don't mind losing World Wars, because it sets the stage for the next step in their evolution. Yes, that's exactly right. I'd just lay a little foundation here to get some terminology down. We have a lot of misnomers in the left versus right, and I think it's important that we set the baseline for this. First of all, human social behavior is way too complex to use on a one-dimensional scale of right versus left.

9:47 But the traditional one, what I'm showing right here, this is a traditional political spectrum where you have the radical and far left over here on the left. The liberal is just left of center. And that would be the modern liberal, not the classical liberal. They stole my word because I consider myself a classical liberal. Moderate, of course, is the center. You have the conservative, which is right of center and what they call the reactionary or the far right. This is so far from being what the true economic spectrum is.

10:18 But that's how they divide us between right and left to divide us against each other. It's Hegelian, which we'll be talking about over and over again because Hegel is the foundational philosopher of all of this. And I think next week's show is going to be almost all dedicated to Hegel because we won't have time to get to him today. But everyone knows we've mentioned them for a while. The next spectrum, the way they describe it in a different way in terms of political, they have far-left communism and far-right fascism.

10:50 just to the left of communism is socialism. And they got a nice little colorful rose there. Oh, and then of course you have liberalism with the angel wings, boring moderates. We have the right conservatism, which is a fire without the angel wings. Then they got libertarianism and they go from libertarianism to fascism. Now here's why this makes no sense. I am a small libertarian. My fundamental viewpoint is I want limited government just enough to maintain order. And then,

11:22 Fascism is 100% government. So how do you make the leap from libertarianism to fascism? The truth is fascism is over here on the left. That's why they call it democratic socialism. But they've done this over the last probably 70 years, stuff like that, made us think that fascism is our right wing. No, it's small government is to the right, big government is to the left. And it really applies to economics. Do you want the government making decisions of supply, demand, what to build?

11:54 And you don't because it'll never be efficient. Someone in Washington, D.C. does not know what the farmers in Kansas want. Farmers in Kansas know what they want. That's what we talk about. You need to protect. It doesn't. Central planning will never work. It'll always be inefficient. And once you get the central planning, there becomes money involved in government. There's an incentive for corruption. Oops. Here's another way of looking at it. The economic spectrum. Individualism was the equality of opportunity in private ownership.

12:30 Okay, that's the extreme over here. Well, with zero government, you get anarchy. And over here is collectivism with economic equality, public ownership. That's where you get to, you know, that's where you have fascism, communism, socialism, all that. That's the more accurate spectrum. There's a guy by the name of Nolan who decided to make it two dimensional. And I don't really buy this philosophy. It's not a way of looking at it. So the scale is economic freedom from left to right.

13:01 and social freedom from top to bottom. So if you want a lot of social freedom and not much economic freedom, you're the libertarian left. If you want economic freedom and social freedom, you're libertarian right. If you want less economic freedom and less social freedom, you're authoritarian left, which is pretty much where most governments are today. And if you want economic freedom,

13:29 But no social freedom. They talk about the authoritarian right. So I don't agree with Nolan's depiction of it. Because, again, he'd have fascism down here. And I think fascism belongs all the way here on the left. But any comments on the scale of right to left? No, that's excellent. I just wanted to set that baseline. And I'm probably done with the screen share for today. Okay. Okay. Boy, that went a little quicker than I expected.

14:06 Well, let me add this because going back to the origins, the pre origins with the before we even get to the Fabians, the fellowship, I found an excerpt on what their promotion was. So you'll see as you present the Fabian piece of this, how.

14:33 Again, this is just evidence of the gradualism as they're morphing. So keep in mind, this organization started, they had all of their doctrine and stuff published by 1883. But here's their bullets on what.

14:55 Their agenda was replacing competition and self-seeking with unselfish regard for the general good. Simplicity of living, which means you will own nothing and live in a smart city. The highest and completest education by the government. Combining manual labor with intellectual pursuits.

15:29 organizing meetings for religious communion lectures and conferences. So basically that's their indoctrination piece of it. And the reason why I wanted to bring this up is when you delve into some of the organizations that morph out of the Fabian Society, I need to add one more to your...

15:53 education or your terms there, the overview. That's religion. These people are not religious. They are atheists. They are all atheists. And what is really important to understand, they talk in religious terms as an atheist.

16:13 Their religion, as we get down the road to talking about the Milner Group, they are the first ones that I saw in writing that actually says that these Fabian ideals are their religion. One world government is their religion. And they are dedicated to making it happen.

16:38 by all means necessary. So anytime during this where you're doing your own research and you hear them talk about, just like they just did, the religious communion, they're not talking about a God. They're not talking about Jesus Christ. Their religious endeavors is basically one world government. Everything the sun sets on one world government. Yeah, and they justify it.

17:07 you know historically we had a wonderful renaissance period with some of these great thinkers many of them from scotland the netherlands some french and a few german great philosophers that gave us this whole ideas of individual liberty the whole concept is natural rights natural law god-given natural rights and if any single one of us our natural rights are taken away then we all lose our rights

17:35 And that is juxtaposed against this whole collectivist mentality where the good of the whole outweighs the good of the individual. And the problem is these are the people that want to decide what's the good of the whole. They become the technocrats, the bureaucrats, the people that are running our world. They want to decide. And it is a religion. It is a death cult. Yes. But they do not respect the individual rights. And that is the fundamental difference. And that's what we're going to talk about now is the philosophical.

18:04 and philosophers that you know set the tone for this and if you want to say basically uh say the john locke faction on one hand were the people that i support versus the collectivists on the other which would be everyone from karl marx to hegel the fabian socialists etc um that's really the the fundamental battle that we are fighting right now from an ideological standpoint i didn't get these i was going to put these guys pictures up like we usually do but

18:35 Some of these portraits are so terrible and it wasn't even worth it. As you transition to the people, I also want to add their word motto to their sheep's, wolf and sheep's clothing. I don't know if you ran across this. Educate, agitate, and organize. That was their beginning motto. Yeah, I got that one in there somewhere. Okay.

19:04 Give me one second. I want to sum up the book just a little bit more. So it really talks about, the book itself talks about, part one is basically Great Britain and the origins, and it traces the Fabian society's founding, describes their strategy of gradual permeation of society through intellectual influence, education, political infiltration, rather than violent revolution. It talks about their role in creating the British Labour Party, which is in power this very day. So these people we're talking about are running England.

19:37 to the ground and the second part talks about the how they infiltrated the united states now how did the ideas cross the atlantic taking root in the elite circles um we're looking to the turtle bay intellectuals in 1920s in new york one of the big themes you know we got out of um we got into the what was called the romantic period he had this idea in the 1800s called modernism and

20:05 These intellectuals, these people of high society, thought that they were better than their predecessors. These religious people that founded the country, they were looking for more highbrow ideas. They had to be different. That's where these philosophies come from. The book discusses all the presidents that were helping push the Fabians, especially FDR onwards. The key themes are gradualism versus deception.

20:33 How they work through elite networks with the emphasis on Ivy League schools, foundations, think tanks. Sound familiar? Education. It draws the parallels to communism, but also shows the differences. And this is 1966. And this author, Martin, called it a threat to America, called it an onrushing socialism, erading constitutional separation of powers, free enterprise and national sovereignty through big government spending and internationalism.

21:04 Americans, the call to action with Americans must recognize the tortoise now on a freeway before it's too late. So that would be incredible reading. I've only I've only browsed it and went through a summary. So there was something I was going to add to that. The other bridge you're talking about, this philosophy migrating to the United States.

21:38 just to tease a future segment. One of the most critical bridges of bringing this to the United States was the Pilgrim Society. It was created in 1902, just after the Fabians had got all of their crap together. And it's going to be, you're going to see the names of the Pilgrim Society people when we get to it.

22:04 are all of these people. They included Skull and Bone members. They included State Department members. They included all of the people that we have already covered. It's another one of those entities that no one talks about that's always hovering in the background. Very good. All right, so our contrasting, our two things we're going to contrast are the Lockean, for John Locke, the Lockean liberal tradition and the Fabian socialist tradition.

22:35 And the two cannot coexist in my mind. Again, we're using the word liberal the way it's supposed to be used, meaning things like limited government, individual rights. Those were liberal thoughts. In fact, the fact that today's collectivists call themselves liberals sickens me. So we have to call ourselves classical liberals. Drives me nuts. I want the word back. And that just goes to a long list of other words that they've co-opted, right? That's part of it is controlling the language.

23:05 Oh, at the foundation of the United States, the Federalist Party had nothing to do with federalism. These were the big government nationalists. They were basically socialists waiting to happen. You know, they've been doing that the entire time. All right. So so real quick, in a nutshell, the Lockean liberal tradition is like favors individual natural rights, limited government by consent, primacy of liberty and private property. Government only exists to protect the individual.

23:34 That is the fundamental belief of the Lockean liberal. And I would say myself as well. The Fabian socialist tradition is gradual, elite driven permeation of society to achieve democratic socialism. Government is a positive tool for social engineering, equality and collective welfare. The inevitability of gradualness is the quote. You couldn't have two more diametrically opposed philosophies, right? Correct. So we'll start with John Locke, who I.

24:09 Basically, he's the main guy on my Mount Rushmore. This guy is my personal hero in many ways. He's not perfect, but some of the things he said really resound. John Locke is known as the father of liberalism. He lived through the English Civil War and the glorious revolution that we talked about in our last show with England in 1688, where they got the English Bill of Rights, which is what we modeled the U.S., the American Bill of Rights after. And that's talked about as having liberty and rights.

24:43 His important works. He wrote a book called A Letter Concerning Toleration in 1689. The big one was called Two Treatises of Government in 1690. And then he wrote an essay concerning human understanding. His quotes, being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty, or possessions.

25:19 He also writes, the great and chief end of men uniting into commonwealths and putting themselves under government is the preservation of their property. Notice the emphasis on property. Yes. We didn't have that prior to these great Renaissance thinkers because the king or the nobles owned everything. You didn't get private property, but you lived by their leave. This is a huge revolutionary concept that we can own our own property. In fact, Locke wrote.

25:50 Life, liberty, and property? Yes. And the one, my biggest pet peeve with Thomas Jefferson is he changed it and put pursuit of happiness. Had we kept property in that declaration, so many of the socialist things they've been throwing at us over the last century would never have been allowed. It would have been even more anathema to our foundational principles. This all comes from John Locke. He says, whenever the legislators endeavor to take away and destroy the property of the people,

26:22 They put themselves into a state of war with the people who are thereupon absolved from any further obedience. Pretty profound stuff. Yeah. So who was he influenced by? Where did he get these ideas from? Some pretty important guys. Now, when we did the Netherlands show a little while back, we talked about my boy Hugo Grotius. Yes. And just a real quick reminder to everyone.

26:52 He's the guy who really shaped the nature of how nations interact with each other. He was a lawyer, spent his life in exile because he was an enemy of the state. But he's known as the father of international law. And basically, he's the guy who put legal handcuffs on the kings and generals of Europe. He said, war is not a playground for glory. It is a legal procedure. And the only just reasons to go to war are self-defense, recovery of stolen property, or to punish a crime.

27:24 He's the guy who created Jus in Bella, the law in war. So that's just one of the big, big influences on our boy John Locke. Another big influence was one of my favorite names in history, Samuel von Poffendorf. Poffendorf is a German jurist, a political philosopher, economist, and a historian. He's famous for his revisions of natural law theories of Hobbes and Grotius.

27:59 And my favorite quote from him is the fundamental natural law is this, that every man must cherish and maintain sociability so far as in him lies. Okay. Locke's next real big influence was a guy by the name of Rene Descartes. French philosopher. You know Descartes, right? Yes. 1596 to 1650. He was a French philosopher, logician, scientist, and mathematician.

28:37 These people are multi-disciplined for a reason. The whole logic, the philosophical thinking crossed over from math to science to economics. They weren't specialized to the degree we are now. And I think that's the... We always tried to make the Renaissance man we talk about. That's what these guys were. They were the true Renaissance men. Some of the greatest people that ever lived.

29:08 And Descartes, of course, is a seminal figure in the emergence of modern philosophy and science. He's the guy who said, I think, therefore, I am. Some of his other great quotes. Doubt is the origin of wisdom. I love that one. Yeah. Skepticism. He also says, divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it. So that was the great Rene Descartes. And again, I didn't show these pictures for a reason.

29:42 Those portraits make these guys look pretty darn ugly. So who did John Locke influence? Some pretty important people too. Adam Smith, alive 723 to 1790. A Scottish economist and philosopher. This is the big proponent of free markets, the invisible hand, and minimal government in the economy. Smith's theories weren't perfect, but they were certainly on the right track. The books he wrote.

30:18 were the theory of moral sentiments in 1759 and an inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations in 1776 these are the guys that our founding fathers were reading they founded this country based on these ideas right they wrote a constitution that enshrined them into law and yet somehow we lost it because of the fabian gradualism little by little by little

30:50 Yeah, and it was even happening before the Fabians really articulated it. The Fabians just took it to a brand new level and said, okay, this is exactly how we're going to have a state-controlled society. But see, that's why when we were doing the Roosevelts, that's why I made such a big deal out of the one uncle that wrote in 1850 that paper that basically was socialism. Yes.

31:17 And this has been around for a long time. The fact that they actually set up the Fabian Society and put an emblem and got a motto doesn't mean that that was the beginning of this thought process. It was the consolidation and almost the accreditation of it formulating. But those thoughts.

31:41 Both on both sides of the Atlantic has been around for a very long time from very prominent families. Yeah. And you can find some of the roots of this stuff in the Greek philosophers. Both sides of this debate, the Greeks had versions of. Yes. Okay. Where am I? Oh, Adam Smith. Some of his great quotes. And I love this one. This is from the Wealth of Nations. It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker.

32:17 that we expect our dinner, but from their regard to their own interest. What she's saying there is, guys, the butcher, the brewer, and the baker aren't making their wares because they like you. They're making it because they think they can make something that other people will value, so you'll pay them so they can look after themselves. Some people call that capitalism. He didn't. But it's exactly how efficient markets work. It's exactly how collectivism doesn't work.

32:49 It's the individual doing what is best for the individual. Based on your skill set and your interest, you are going to do something that allows you to make a living. And there's so many decision points made in a free market of decisions of whether I'm going to buy this loaf of bread or that one. And the market will respond with pricing mechanisms. And no AI centralized computer could ever be as efficient.

33:19 as a market that's allowed to operate without the government sticking its hand in there correct that is what the free market is all about every single one of us making choices and the market will respond a lot faster than the government will that's for damn sure you know we've seen what happens when you get government centralized control you get bread lines in russia you get um the holodomor people starving all over ukraine we've seen it time after time government does not central planning does not will not work

33:45 So sorry, technocrats, no matter how smart your AI gets, it'll never be as smart as a free market because people change their minds. The market's always getting constant feedback and decisions. And if you want something that the market's not producing, someone will step in and produce it. And that's how we went. You know, we produce more wealth in the last 200 years than an entire history of mankind. All right. More quotes from Smith. Every man, as long as he does not violate the laws of justice.

34:16 is left perfectly free to pursue his own interest his own way he says little else is requisite to carry a state to the highest degree of opulence from the lowest barbarism but peace easy taxes and a tolerable administration of justice so obviously adam smith was foundational in the founding of the united states who else did john locke influence oh how about thomas jefferson my favorite of the founding fathers

34:52 live 1743 to 1826. And of course, he is known for talking about inalienable rights. And of course, wrote the Declaration of Independence. And again, my only pet peeve with Jefferson, of course, is he left out property. And we are paying the price for that today. Best example of that I can give you is you hear these people talking about stakeholder capitalism, or basically because you live in the neighborhood, you've got a stake in my company. That would never have...

35:24 we would never have gotten that across the starting you know got the starting line if we had life liberty and property correct uh how about some jefferson quotes jefferson officer was influenced by montesquieu and we could do some montesquieu all day long but it's going to sound about like the same stuff we hold these truths to be self-evident that all men are created equal well it doesn't stop there that's when lincoln did the uh the uh sorry the gettysburg address he stopped that all men are created equal

35:55 The rest of that sentence reads that they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. When you say all men are created equal and then you have government policy that tries to make everyone have an equal outcome, you do so by taking away everyone else's rights. That's not what Jefferson said. That's why Lincoln is a collectivist. And he most certainly would have been very happy with the Fabian socialists. Jefferson wrote the tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.

36:32 Think we're overdue for that? No comment. We are not inciting violence, people. Actually, I think the biggest mistakes they made is with the Article 5 conventions. They should have required it every 10 years because it's the only tool they gave the states to pull back the tyrannical federal government. That is the only tool we have, and yet we've never had a convention of states. It should have been mandatory every 10 years, and that's what Jefferson was talking about. But let me suggest to you,

37:02 that if they hadn't effed up the Senate process, that was the check and balance, which is why they destroyed it. Yeah, that's a big one, the 17th Amendment. Yeah. But we were already way, way down that line. We were just gotten out of, you know, this is the progressive era. We're in the middle of it. And we've already got it. The pendulum swings and the...

37:31 I believe that in the gradualism philosophy that the undoing of the state's appointment of senators was like a long pole in the tent because it happened at the same time of the individual tax and all that other stuff in order to prop the whole thing up. That period of time was critical. And when did it happen? It happened after all of these people.

38:02 Got together, the Fabian Society, the Pilgrim Society, the CFR. It happened all in that same span of time. Yeah. And like we said, these were not new ideas. They were just taken to the next level at that point in time. We were asked all the time, you know, when we teach the Constitution, you know, when did this when did these great ideas get derailed? And what Doug's answer, which I'll steal from, is before the ink was even dry on the paper, you had Hamilton stepping in there.

38:30 you know saying well you got to read between the lines and jefferson says well i've read between the lines and all i see is blank space and and that's true there's always going to be forces um there but you see a market ship shift after the 1900s in that time frame right there

38:50 I still say that the biggest shift in terms of taking away states' rights was 1861 when Lincoln decided to fight a war. I'm not talking about state rights. I'm talking about that disassembling of the Constitution with the individual taxation, the changing of the way we elect our senators, that kind of, that to me was monumental. Yeah, well, to me, the right to secede because of a voluntary union was foundational to getting us to that point.

39:18 after that after that we're being held together at the point of a bayonet and of course the income tax was always going to happen because of that again this is just different steps of the you know the different they've always just taken steps forward yes the wrongs of the latter jefferson also wrote to take from one because it is thought his own industry has acquired too much in order to spare to spare to others who have not exercised equal industry is to violate arbitrarily the first principle of association

39:52 that guarantee to everyone the free exercise of this industry. It's talking about taxation. Well, and redistribution of wealth and everything else, the welfare system, like everything. So we're talking about transitions. Most people held these viewpoints, the classical liberal, right around the time of the revolution. And then we get the French Revolution, where the Jacobins get inserted in what was supposed to be a Republican revolution, and it became the first communist revolution.

40:24 To be honest with you, it was the first leftist. The French Revolution was fought by leftists. The most violent people were always on the left. Because like the colonel said, by any means necessary. To these people, the ends always justify the means. And that makes them so damn dangerous. We saw that on display in Tennessee yesterday. And we see it all over the country. And yet, our FBI managed to spend millions of dollars and man hours.

40:55 trying to create the illusion that it's the right the quote unquote right wing that's the violent right-wing extremists while the southern part of the law center is financing to create the you know to create this that's why they manufactured january 6th they have to keep this image up but history tells us that but the left has always been the violent ones the key bridge figure in the philosophies of these philosophers is a guy by the name of john stewart mill and he lived from 1806 to 1873.

41:28 He's so important because if you read John Stuart Mill when he's younger, he would agree with Adam Smith and John Locke. And then he transitioned and got into kind of morphed liberalism into what's now social liberalism. He was that central figure. He's a very important part of our history. And the Fabians absolutely love him. You know, he was his key philosophy was called the harm principle. And it is evolving views on intervention.

42:01 The longer he lived, the more he wanted the government to get involved and to force his outcomes. So you can hear his quotes. If you read Mill, you have to understand it's got to be done chronologically because the later Mill, early Mill says the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community against his will is to prevent harm to others. Well, that's a libertarian. That's that's the non-aggression principle. Right. Right. And then he says over himself, over his own body and mind, the individual is sovereign.

42:32 Nothing wrong with that at all. Later on, he says, the social problem of the future is to be the best possible reconciliation of liberty with equality. What? What happened there, Stuart Mill? So this is the guy. He's the bridge. And his writings were a big deal. And when we get into the Fabians, he'll be brought up again. Next.

43:08 The important philosopher of this period is a guy who we know and love by the name of Karl Marx. Marx, of course, we've heard his quotes all day long, so I'll go through them as quick as I can. But, you know, he lived from 1818 to 1883 with his lifelong best friend, Frederick Ingalls, who we'll talk about. Ingalls was the son of a wealthy mercantilist family. So Marx never had to work a day in his life. He's described as a German philosopher, political theorist, sociologist and economist.

43:40 They wrote the Communist Manifesto in 1848. Abraham Lincoln had a copy of the Communist Manifesto. He liked it. Tell people think Lincoln's a great man. Yeah, thank you, Abe. Marx would go on to write Das Kapital in 1867 through 94. It was a long ongoing series of articles. And of course, he preached violent revolution and class warfare. Marx said, the history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles.

44:16 And the famous, from each according to his ability to each according to his needs, which is the exact opposite of the free market system we were just singing the praises of. We could do a whole show on Marx, but I think everyone knows enough about him. Obviously, the violent class struggle didn't happen. It didn't even happen in Russia, people. That was a London and Wall Street bank financed.

44:50 foreign invasion and wasn't an uprising of the masses agreed yes okay when it didn't happen they switched they we'll get into this a little bit later but you'll find that the frankfurt school a bunch of nine professors came over to america mostly ivy league schools they introduced something called cultural marxism but living through that today but that's later in our story so stay tuned

45:17 Who was the Karl Marx's biggest influences? Well, Frederick Engels, his buddy, who was born in Prussia against a prosperous mercantile family, immediately rejected his devout family's pietist values. The colonel mentions these people are atheists. He joined a group called the Young Hegelians. Who? Hegel? Oh, yeah. So this is a group of German intellectuals in the 1830s and 40s. And they're all atheists. And they're trying to...

45:50 We're entering this period of modernism. The Industrial Revolution is on. Life has gotten easy. We have this new class system coming into the West. These are the young Hegelians, these young intellectuals, and they're rejecting all the great teachings of the Renaissance thinkers. And these are the ones that get it. They were the predecessors. One generation later, they become the, sorry, the Fabian socialists.

46:22 And of course, they morph into the Fabians. They do. And their ideas, the Fabians basically collected all their ideas and formalized it and turned it into an action plan. We've already talked about Cecil Rhodes. He's alive at this exact period of time. The Civil War was not, quote unquote, Civil War. It's not the only major change. These are conflicting value systems that are going on. That's a huge part of why that war was fought, was these two conflicting ideas.

46:50 Top-down government control versus individual liberty. Guess which side Lincoln was on. You've told us. I'm going to keep hammering that one home. Of course, the biggest influence of Karl Marx was the one Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, who I think we're going to have to spend most of the show next week on. There's just too much to him and it's too important. Would you agree? Yes.

47:21 all right george bernard shaw's in there but we'll talk we'll talk about the founders of the fabians when we that's coming up i won't get into their their philosophers because there's a bunch of them i do want to kind of switch gears on this because this topic's been going around quite a bit um and that is um our friends at the promethean action group uh barbara boyd what's the other name that when you've been on the show with susan kukenda yeah and another one of these larushians

47:56 is my friend, Matthew Errett. And I'm not calling these people out because I think they're necessarily bad people. I'm calling them because I have a fundamental disagreement. I consider Matt Errett to be one of the best historians going. He's a gentleman. I've had him on my channel. He's had me on his, and I do consider him a friend. We disagree on a couple of things, and I want to get into that because I think it's important. With these Promethean action people coming out of nowhere and getting so many followers so fast.

48:23 And I agree with Promethean action on a lot of what they're saying about the history. They're not wrong. They just come to a different conclusion. And I want to discuss that here. And I think having those philosophical differences out in the open is exactly what needs to happen. So people can come to their own conclusion. Yeah. Yeah. And I'm more than happy to have a conversation. People are trying to get Matt and I to have this discussion for a long time. It just hasn't happened.

48:52 Again, I got a ton of respect for him. This is a disagreement. The thing about the LaRoucheans is you need to look up who Lyndon LaRouche was. There's a lot of conspiracy theories about him. It's a very well-funded group. And anybody who calls themselves a LaRouchean, like these Promethean X people, they're going to have done their homework. It's sort of like when you meet someone with the John Birch Society. They are very well taught. They know their arguments.

49:17 I get to debate birchers all the time on the article five convention. And I love the, I like these people a lot. We just disagree on this fundamental thing. And they still haven't answered the question of how are you going to have the federal government curtail itself without an article five convention? There is no answer to it. Vote harder. So what, what the fact Matt put out a piece recently when he's talking about what's called the English free market system versus the American system of economics. First of all,

49:49 What he calls the English free market system is what I was describing from John Locke. That was not the English system. The English system at the time was mercantilism. Mercantilism is where a few favored companies get advantages because they're closer to the government. It's like having a government monopoly. And this is why the Dutch East India Company failed and why the Netherlands, Dutch Republic fell. It's why the British Empire fell because of the mercantilist system is by definition corruption. Anytime the government gets to hand out goodies, it invites corruption, period. End of story.

50:18 So can I just add something here? I know you're on a roll, but I want to put this in context for people who are not familiar with Matt. And again, this isn't a slight. I just want to put it in context so our audience understands. Matt lives in Canada. Canada is part of the crown. So it is very different perspective from the.

50:48 viewpoint that Brady is presenting. Um, you, regardless of where you're at, origins matter. And there is, um, all of your previous experiences, it's very hard and challenging for people to, um, step outside of their comfort zone. And Brady's point is dead on. Um,

51:14 oftentimes referred to as capital cronyism. The mercantile system is not a good system. Go ahead. No, thank you. That's excellent. It is not. In fact, we fought a bloody revolutionary war to get away from the mercantilist system. Great examples. They put a T tax on us and a stamp tax act. So our American companies couldn't compete against the British. This is protectionism.

51:43 This is what the LaRouchians are touting is the American system. That protecting a few small industries is good. And I'm saying, no, it's not. I want a free market and get the government the hell out of it. And I'm okay with a tariff. Not a protective tariff. There's a difference between the two. Because one of them gets corrupted. If there's a flat tariff, basically to protect domestic production, that's a good thing. As long as it's even and spread across the board.

52:10 when the government starts picking winners and losers you get corruption the first of these people the american mercantilists was alexander hamilton and he sat there in the convention in 1787 argued for a british system only under an american king he hated the british but he wanted to be like them well he got shot down voted you know then he turns around writes the federalist papers because it's gonna be really hard to get this thing ratified in new york the constitution

52:41 Writes the Federalist Papers and says a lot of really good things supporting the Constitution. Then the richest guy in America writes a letter, a guy by the name of Morris, writes a letter to Washington and recommends Hamilton be the Secretary of the Treasury. Hamilton gets there and then does everything he wanted to do regardless of what the Constitution says, including starting a central bank. That's not allowed. That's not in the Constitution.

53:08 So if you're going to have a written law, you should probably follow it. And when I say things started going wrong before the ink was dry, that's because Hamilton got there. And Robert Morris isn't necessarily a bad guy. He helped finance. When Washington was broke, Morris sent him money. So he's not a terrible guy. Interesting side story. One of the first things Hamilton did is he nationalized all the state Revolutionary War debt. Well, that's not in the Constitution as a power, as an enumerated power, but he did it anyways. But it's worse than that.

53:37 because he told his cronies that he was going to do that. So what happens is your guy, like Robert Morris, you hire the fastest horses and boats and go all around to all the different colonies or in other states and buy up all of this Revolutionary War debt from the Revolutionary War veterans who got paid in paper script from the states. They're trading it like five cents on the dollar. They don't know if it's going to be nationalized. These people take the script back to D.C. and it becomes whole as a dollar. These people made 20 times their money.

54:04 robert morris made over 300 million dollars in that period of time by buying up revolutionary war heroes debt that was disgusting morris of course in a side note would die penniless he was a pauper spent his last years so oh darn yeah it's a really sad story but that's what this whole that's the problem is you get anytime the government gets involved in the economy you're going to get crony capitalism or mercantilism insiders

54:33 that share that intel which is happening right now yeah and now you have an incentive to get politicians in there that will hand out goodies to their buddies now you get the corrupt system that we see that we're living through today correct and it starts with that you can't give them an inch because it will always incrementally get more and more and more and they never take a step backwards the big one hamilton pushed for was federally funded internal improvements and that's a direct quote what that meant in his time was building canals so his shipbuilding buddies could do more commerce

55:05 well canals are great and this is what the american system is all about that the government spend money so we can all do all make more money but what it does is it once again produces winners and losers it is a corrupt system and it makes for a corrupt government you cannot have it if a canal is a great idea guess what the private system can build it just as easily right right if it makes that much sense okay so i got a great example to close with lincoln the entire republican party it's plank in the 1860 election

55:36 was the first two parts of its plank were federally funded internal improvements and of course protective tariffs they had to protect their industries from the brits because the south was shipping all their stuff to you know to europe all their cottons for the textile place and and the north needed to tax that because that's the only way they could build their factories to compete every time you put an import tariff is an export tax so when the south seceded the north couldn't live without that tax that's what the war was all about but the republican party ran

56:07 on federally funded internal improvements. In this case, it was building the railroads. And we know what happened with the railroads. After the war, we created the robber barons, people like the Vanderbilts, the Rockefellers, you name it. All the robber barons got rich on government federally funded internal improvements, created the greatest wealth disparity in history. Yeah, they ended slavery, and then they put a bunch of people to work at wages that were worse than slavery. That's how we got unions.

56:36 this was the corrupt system so i'm going to give you a great example of this everybody's heard of the transcontinental railroad right yeah there was another transcontinental railroad built about a decade or so later okay that was done by the transcontinental railroad was federally funded they were given land grants which means give you free land um they bought out the federal government bought out anybody who's in the way of the air of the of the railway the railroad barons

57:10 took bribes from towns to say, okay, I want to get the railroad to go through my town. But here's the comparison of what a government does versus what a privately built railway does. Transcontinental Railroad built in 1869, 1,911 miles. The Great Northern Railroad Railway built about a decade and a half later, privately financed by James J. Hill and financed privately through investments was 1,700 miles long. So pretty comparable, right?

57:40 Transcontinental Railroad, government-funded, took it six years to build. The private one took three years. The government cost $48,000 per mile. The private one cost $30,000 per mile. Total cost of Transcontinental Railroad was $125 million. $61 million of it was government-funded. Total cost of the Great Northern Railway, $51 million. So half. Yeah, less than half. Half the time at less than half the cost.

58:12 Private versus government. And of course, the government. What's that? True every time. Every single time. That's why you cannot have central planning. It will never be. It will always be inefficient and corrupt. And of course, there were scandals all over the Transcontinental Railroad. All kinds of, you know. And I'll remind you that Lincoln was a railroad lawyer from day one. Those are the people who hired him to be president. That's right. The Great Northern Railway was praised for efficient construction without taxpayer burden.

58:43 Free market, socialism. Which one do you want? Free market. Every single time. Sorry, I told you this is a show I was kind of been training for my whole life. It is. There's more on this stuff. I am very passionate about free markets and individual liberty, as you can tell. You've done an awesome job. I think we need to spend some time on Hegel before we get to the founding of the Fabians. Said a little bit more. Yeah, I agree.

59:16 because he's fundamental to it. Yeah, yeah. We're living, we see him every day. I mean, that's why we've been talking about our shows for three years, for the love of God. That's the whole crux of the Operation Gladio is the Galilean dialect. It really is. And that was such a great analogy. Who was it? The SR that came up with it yesterday? I call the State Department one wing of the bird. He goes, no, that's the beak of the foreign policy. That was so good.

59:45 well thank you everyone for letting me get on my soapbox this is something i'm very passionate about this topic uh it feeds into our storyline but um there was no way i was gonna get off the hook and again we got a ton of respect for these promethean action people matt it's there's a fundamental disagreement and well and so understand this because i'm going to talk about this for a minute militarily when you go into an operation with coalition forces

1:00:15 there's a basis and there's an end state and then there's the operation, right? So people come from different perspectives on why this operation is necessary. You don't all have to agree. You have to agree on it being necessary, but not for the same reasons. Also, once the operation is over,

1:00:45 Because you came into it with different agendas, you are going to use that operation for a different end state. You're not all collectively going towards the same end state. This may be step three in someone else's end step. It may have been just one and done.

1:01:06 for party number two, and it may be step four on party number three, but all three parties are going to engage in the operation and continue with their own vested interests at the end of the operation. So just because you spend time in the trenches together with someone does not mean you are headed in the same direction. And that is something that is incredibly important

1:01:35 from a military perspective, because during the time that you're in the operation, based on where they started and where they're going, you need to make sure that the operation isn't affected by differing agendas. And so you can lock arms with people during an event or for a period of time and disagree on the end state.

1:02:08 And I think that's what you're articulating. It's possible that they're looking for a different end state, but we are on a journey right now where their expertise is very important educationally for what is going on. And we may agree on many of the points that they have during this particular phase, but we may not agree on the end state.

1:02:33 Yeah, and it's similar to something I've been saying. They're talking about making the world seem binary, and I'm saying there's a third way that the Constitution actually preached. What they're basically comparing is the British internationalist system versus an American nationalist system. Their economic nationalism is something that's what Trump economics is, is the part of the American system. Trump would have agreed with Hamilton and Lincoln because he cares about growing GDP and stuff like that, and he's not a constitutionalist per se.

1:03:03 I think those people are absolutely necessary to defeat the internationalists, who we now call globalists, the one world government people. We need economic nationalists on our side to do that because the free market can't do it. We are stronger collectively. One thing centralized government is good at is fighting wars. That's it. But decentralized self-ownership is not as good at fighting wars. So we need them to win this battle. It's what happens afterwards that I care about.

1:03:33 And I'm sure as hell not going to live under a different version of fascism just because it's national versus international. And so I agree with them that they're on our side. They're America first types. But the solution will be different. I mean, we need a Donald Trump right now, a strong leader. The whole point of one world government is you have to destroy all the other governments. There can be no individual nation state. So America has to fall. Well, I don't want America to fall because I do believe we're different.

1:04:03 So for now, I'm behind any policy to make sure that America stays strong, even though I don't agree with everything we do, like in places like Iran, et cetera. A strong America is imperative. So we don't get one world government because that's what the Fabians want. So we need these nationalists. When the smoke clears after we've won and we've got a multipolar world or what have you, whatever the end game is. Now, then we can have a conversation about getting back to limited government.

1:04:32 And that's why I consider these people allies. Although it's a fundamental difference in philosophy. And I think that's what your military analogy kind of fits that perfectly. Correct. Yeah, I agree. You have to achieve your objective first. Then we can settle the peace. Then we go back and read some more Adam Smith. Yes. Awesome. All right. Well, thanks. Yes. Thanks, everybody, for joining us today. We will be back next Friday with.

1:05:04 hagel you don't want to miss that uh yes george gourd what is his name again i had just said it george william friedrich hagel i'm gonna let you say that i'm just gonna call him hagel all right thanks thanks everybody for joining us

Entities here

Fabian Society25 John Locke14 Thomas Jefferson8 Abraham Lincoln8 United States7 Alexander Hamilton6 Adam Smith6 Karl Marx6 Fellowship of the New Life4 United Kingdom4 Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel4 Robert Morrow4 John Stuart Mill4 Matthew Errett4 The Fabian Freeway: The High Road to Socialism in the USA4 Transcontinental Railroad4 René Descartes3 Hugo Grotius3 Great Northern Railway3 Promethean Action3 Scotland3 Netherlands3 G.W.F. Hegel2 John Birch Society2 Great Britain2 Skull and Bones2 Ron Martin2 Donald Trump2 France2 An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations2 The Federalist Papers2 Germany2 Friedrich Engels2 Young Hegelians2 American Pilgrims1 Glorious Revolution1 Samuel Pufendorf1 Antony Sutton1 Two Treatises of Government1 A Letter Concerning Toleration1

Claims made here

Fabian Society founded London documented ▶ 2:50

“First of all, it's a socialist society founded in 1884 in London. And Britannica describes it as this. It says the Fabian Society was founded in 1884 in London, having as its goal the establishment of…”

Fellowship of the New Life succeeded Fabian Society host_asserted ▶ 4:20

“to the fabian society that i ran across it's actually called the fellowship of the new life and that actually is the predecessor to the baby in society and one of the things it also was called the gui…”

Thomas Davis founded Fellowship of the New Life host_asserted ▶ 4:50

“The Fellowship in 1882 was a guy that was a Scottish American, not even making this up, Scottish American philosopher by the name of Thomas Davidson. And that's really, really important to understand …”

Fabian Society front_for P2 Masonic Lodge host_asserted ▶ 5:20

“on the masonic because it comes in much later on with the p2 lodge and stuff like that um and so i want to just kind of set the stage um with that pre-step to the fabian society because it's going to …”

Ron Martin founded The Fabian Freeway: The High Road to Socialism in the USA documented ▶ 5:44

“So one of the best books on the Fabians is written in 1966. It's called The Fabian Freeway, The High Road to Socialism in the USA, written by Rose L. Martin. I've got it up. I've got the e-book. I for…”

Fabian Society front_for Milner Group host_asserted ▶ 16:13

“Their religion, as we get down the road to talking about the Milner Group, they are the first ones that I saw in writing that actually says that these Fabian ideals are their religion. One world gover…”

Fabian Society founded British Labour Party book_quoted ▶ 19:04

“Give me one second. I want to sum up the book just a little bit more. So it really talks about, the book itself talks about, part one is basically Great Britain and the origins, and it traces the Fabi…”

Fabian Society front_for British Labour Party book_quoted ▶ 19:04

Fabian Society funded United States book_quoted ▶ 20:05

“These intellectuals, these people of high society, thought that they were better than their predecessors. These religious people that founded the country, they were looking for more highbrow ideas. Th…”

American Pilgrims founded United States host_asserted ▶ 21:38

“just to tease a future segment. One of the most critical bridges of bringing this to the United States was the Pilgrim Society. It was created in 1902, just after the Fabians had got all of their crap…”

Skull and Bones member_of American Pilgrims host_asserted ▶ 22:04

“are all of these people. They included Skull and Bone members. They included State Department members. They included all of the people that we have already covered. It's another one of those entities …”

U.S. State Department member_of American Pilgrims host_asserted ▶ 22:04

John Locke founded An Essay Concerning Human Understanding documented ▶ 24:43

“His important works. He wrote a book called A Letter Concerning Toleration in 1689. The big one was called Two Treatises of Government in 1690. And then he wrote an essay concerning human understandin…”

John Locke founded Two Treatises of Government documented ▶ 24:43

John Locke founded A Letter Concerning Toleration documented ▶ 24:43

Hugo Grotius spied_on John Locke host_asserted ▶ 26:22

“They put themselves into a state of war with the people who are thereupon absolved from any further obedience. Pretty profound stuff. Yeah. So who was he influenced by? Where did he get these ideas fr…”

Samuel Pufendorf spied_on John Locke host_asserted ▶ 27:24

“He's the guy who created Jus in Bella, the law in war. So that's just one of the big, big influences on our boy John Locke. Another big influence was one of my favorite names in history, Samuel von Po…”

René Descartes spied_on John Locke host_asserted ▶ 27:59

“And my favorite quote from him is the fundamental natural law is this, that every man must cherish and maintain sociability so far as in him lies. Okay. Locke's next real big influence was a guy by th…”

Adam Smith spied_on John Locke host_asserted ▶ 29:42

“Those portraits make these guys look pretty darn ugly. So who did John Locke influence? Some pretty important people too. Adam Smith, alive 723 to 1790. A Scottish economist and philosopher. This is t…”

Adam Smith founded An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations host_asserted ▶ 30:18

“were the theory of moral sentiments in 1759 and an inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations in 1776 these are the guys that our founding fathers were reading they founded this count…”

Adam Smith founded The Theory of Moral Sentiments host_asserted ▶ 30:18

Thomas Jefferson member_of John Locke host_asserted ▶ 34:16

“is left perfectly free to pursue his own interest his own way he says little else is requisite to carry a state to the highest degree of opulence from the lowest barbarism but peace easy taxes and a t…”

Thomas Jefferson founded Declaration of Independence documented ▶ 34:52

“live 1743 to 1826. And of course, he is known for talking about inalienable rights. And of course, wrote the Declaration of Independence. And again, my only pet peeve with Jefferson, of course, is he …”

Thomas Jefferson member_of Montesquieu host_asserted ▶ 35:24

“we would never have gotten that across the starting you know got the starting line if we had life liberty and property correct uh how about some jefferson quotes jefferson officer was influenced by mo…”

Karl Marx member_of Friedrich Engels host_asserted ▶ 43:08

“The important philosopher of this period is a guy who we know and love by the name of Karl Marx. Marx, of course, we've heard his quotes all day long, so I'll go through them as quick as I can. But, y…”

Karl Marx founded Communist Manifesto documented ▶ 43:40

“They wrote the Communist Manifesto in 1848. Abraham Lincoln had a copy of the Communist Manifesto. He liked it. Tell people think Lincoln's a great man. Yeah, thank you, Abe. Marx would go on to write…”

Karl Marx founded Das Kapital documented ▶ 43:40

Abraham Lincoln member_of Communist Manifesto host_asserted ▶ 43:40

Friedrich Engels member_of Young Hegelians documented ▶ 45:17

“Who was the Karl Marx's biggest influences? Well, Frederick Engels, his buddy, who was born in Prussia against a prosperous mercantile family, immediately rejected his devout family's pietist values. …”

Young Hegelians succeeded Fabian Society host_asserted ▶ 45:50

“We're entering this period of modernism. The Industrial Revolution is on. Life has gotten easy. We have this new class system coming into the West. These are the young Hegelians, these young intellect…”

Karl Marx member_of Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel host_asserted ▶ 46:50

“Top-down government control versus individual liberty. Guess which side Lincoln was on. You've told us. I'm going to keep hammering that one home. Of course, the biggest influence of Karl Marx was the…”

Alexander Hamilton founded The Federalist Papers documented ▶ 52:10

“when the government starts picking winners and losers you get corruption the first of these people the american mercantilists was alexander hamilton and he sat there in the convention in 1787 argued f…”

Robert Morrow appointed Alexander Hamilton host_asserted ▶ 52:41

“Writes the Federalist Papers and says a lot of really good things supporting the Constitution. Then the richest guy in America writes a letter, a guy by the name of Morris, writes a letter to Washingt…”

James J. Hill financed_via Great Northern Railway host_asserted ▶ 57:10

“took bribes from towns to say, okay, I want to get the railroad to go through my town. But here's the comparison of what a government does versus what a privately built railway does. Transcontinental …”

Abraham Lincoln member_of Transcontinental Railroad host_asserted ▶ 58:12

“Private versus government. And of course, the government. What's that? True every time. Every single time. That's why you cannot have central planning. It will never be. It will always be inefficient …”

Donald Trump member_of Fabian Society host_asserted ▶ 1:02:33

“Yeah, and it's similar to something I've been saying. They're talking about making the world seem binary, and I'm saying there's a third way that the Constitution actually preached. What they're basic…”