SITREP Ukraine, Pakistan and Israel wWar Hamster and GBPH

1:59:33

auto-scroll word highlight

Transcript

0:00 to another edition of Sit Rep with Warhamster Brady and Ghost of Beast Patrick Henry. Welcome, guys. Thanks for having us. Great idea, Gordon. These are always a lot of fun. For sure. For sure. It's been too long since we've all gotten together and had a chat, so looking forward to it. Yeah, the last time I think we did the Scott Ritter's rant up there, I got really good feedback on that one, and then Scott Ritter actually started following me after I posted that video. Oh, really? Yeah, that was kind of cool.

0:30 That was pretty cool. Awesome. Yeah. All right. So the format we normally follow is Warhamster is going to take the lead and set us up. Then we'll have a little bit of discussion, and we're going to talk about three geographical regions, and I'm going to turn it over to Warhamster. Okie dokie. All right. We're going to hit three big hot spots going on in the world right this moment. We're going to start with probably the hottest, and that is the Russia-Ukraine conflict.

1:00 amid Trump's promises to get at peace almost overnight. It seems there's a lot of people resisting that. We can discuss that a little bit. But over the weekend, in the last few days, as the BBC reports, deadly Russian missile and drone attacks hit Ukraine this weekend as Donald Trump stepped up his criticism of Vladimir Putin. The U.S. president says Russia's leader is absolutely crazy.

1:28 and needlessly killing a lot of people. What I found very interesting is when that first happened, and we'll get into some of the details about why Russia's having more success with their aerial bombardments, but more importantly, why? Because when it was announced that they hit Kiev with the biggest missile and drone attacks ever, or since this began, Trump was unaware. He was asked about it by someone in the media.

1:57 And Trump said, I had not heard that. Which brings up the question, why did we know about that? To be precise, Putin was visiting one of the regions near the border, and the Ukrainians had sent a massive drone attack trying to take out Putin. A couple of questions. We know American intelligence has basically been helping Ukraine.

2:27 uh with satellite data and everything like that since day one you know even though we're an innocent bystander but more importantly how the heck did the ukrainians get the intel that putin was going to be there by the border on that day and then second why did trump not know about it at all yeah so so i would argue that uh um i don't know i mean obviously obviously i'm speculating here but i would i would assume that trump

2:56 Is is telling a little bit of a white lie there when he says he is a little bit of theater when he says he didn't know. I suspect that he probably is as read in as anybody in terms of like intelligence and understanding the actuals of what's actually happening. And of course, we throw out the caveat that this could all just be narrative warfare. And to what extent are these attacks happening? We kind of set that aside and we just engage with what's being reported in the story we're being told. But my my assumption is that.

3:24 Have you seen the video? I don't know if you have the video handy. If not, I do. But the video of Trump being asked about Putin and that 44-second clip. Yeah, go ahead and throw it up there. Let me pull it up real quick. I'm sorry. I thought I had it. Let me make sure I have the right one because people have chopped it up a couple of different ways, and I want to make sure I get the... And while you're finding that, I want to kind of further...

3:51 articulate the point Warhamster made about the sharing of intel from day one. You can define day one in 2014 after the CIA couped Ukraine because the CIA has been embedded in Ukraine since 2014. And the New York Times article that came out about six months ago to eight months ago actually validated that. They said not only had they been present.

4:18 in Ukraine since 2014, that in the immediate aftermath of the coup that they orchestrated, along with the International Republican Institute oversaw by John McCain at the time, that USAID, the CIA, and the IRI, to mention just a few, to include the International Institute of Peace, had been funding

4:44 this effort to destabilize Ukraine and basically bait Russia in, just like they had done back in a very long time ago in 1979 in Afghanistan. And that, again, has been all validated by the U.S. State Department and the National Security Council's own people involved. And so.

5:07 That New York Times article talked about the CIA setting up underground intelligence facilities along the Donbass region. So just adding to that, not only is the CIA currently has 17 different bases of operations inside of Ukraine right this moment, and the largest station for the CIA outside of the United States is in Poland, right across the border from the Ukraine. So, yeah.

5:36 Yeah. And that that brings up a good point. You know, the the rhetoric, the language that we've heard out of the Trump administration, Steve Wyckoff has said this many times, getting to the root cause. And I think I think we've heard Marco Rubio and a few others say it as well. Getting to the root cause of the conflict. Right. What is the root cause of the conflict? And obviously, the mining coup of 2014 would be the big one. Arguments can be made that it goes back further than that and that there's other underlying.

6:05 But I would say the root cause of the conflict that provoked an invasion in 2014 was the Maiden coup, which was the CIA overthrowing a legitimately elected government. We actually heard Putin say that. I'll get to that in a minute. He overtly said that. And in the most plain terms, we've heard him say it, I think, to this date. Put simply, you're talking about NATO encroachment. And that goes back to 1991, James Baker.

6:34 Yeah, yeah. And the irony that they backed a quote unquote Nazi overthrow of Ukraine. And to make it even more interesting, a Jewish Nazi overthrow of Ukraine. And that kind of ties it into Israel. We'll get to that later. But let's listen to this 44 second clip of Trump being asked about Putin. I think this is from Sunday. And the way he responds to this, we'll talk about it in a minute.

7:03 Yeah, I'll give you an update. I'm not happy with what Putin's doing. He's killing a lot of people, and I don't know what the hell happened to Putin. I've known him a long time, always gotten along with him, but he's sending rockets into cities and killing people, and I don't like it at all, okay? We're in the middle of talking, and he's shooting rockets into Kiev and other cities. I don't like it at all. President, what do you want to do about that? I'm surprised. I'm very surprised. We'll see what we're going to do. What am I going to tell you?

7:32 You're the fake news, aren't you? You're totally fake. Any other questions? I don't like what Putin is doing. Not even a little bit. He's killing people. And something happened to this guy. And I don't like it. Yeah, they tried to kill him. Yeah. Yeah. So there's a lot of I think I like I played this clip many times on different shows this week because I think it's a very significant clip. And there's a lot going on here in that 44 second clip.

7:59 Number one, I would point to a month ago, Bill Maher got invited to the White House, had dinner with Trump, and then went on his show later that week and talked about, disclosed to his audience. He said, guys, I think that we've all been played. I think that Donald Trump plays a character on television. The guy that I had dinner with and met is nothing like the person that we've seen on TV for the past however many years. I think we're all getting played. Frankly, I think Bill Maher.

8:28 He's an idiot on one hand, but I also think he's smart enough to have already known that. I think he just chose that moment to disclose that to his audience as like, raise the red flag. We need to reevaluate how we're attacking the situation. And I think that's what you're seeing right here. I think Trump is absolutely doing a kabuki theater there when he says that. The way that he chides the guy and says, what am I going to tell you? You're the fake news. I don't like it. It felt like,

8:58 When Hulk Hogan went to the RNC last summer and went in and out of character, like, hey, I'm Terry Bollea. I've known Donald Trump for 40 years. He's a dear friend. I'm Hulk Hogan and ripped off his tank top and then went back to being Terry Bollea. It was like breaking the fourth wall. That's what that felt like right there. So some of the things that I think are hit on there, there's multiple layers. Number one, the assassination attempt, which was which.

9:23 Right after this, it's cut short. He's asked about the assassination attempt on Putin that you just mentioned. He said he knew nothing about it. He's been attacked by a lot of people saying that maybe he's not being fed the right intel. Maybe he's being given bad intel. I don't believe that. I think President Trump gets all the intel he needs. He feigns ignorance. He's dumb like a fox like that.

9:50 The fact that he was assassinated last summer, or the attempt was made on his life, and then weeks after that, we got the story that it was Iran who did it, and his response to that was, if Iran did try to kill me, then I'm going to wipe Iran off the map. Again, I think that's WrestleMania kind of rhetoric. But you have to imagine, if he's applying that standard to himself, he would also extend that standard to Putin. If there is an attempt on Putin's life, then that would be the reason that...

10:19 Putin would send rockets into. That would be your natural reaction, yeah. Exactly, yeah. Finally, before I pass it off, like he says right there, we're talking, we're in the middle of talking, and then you're going to send rockets into this place. What are you thinking? There is a direct parallel between that situation and the situation with Netanyahu in Iran, which we're going to get to later, but I think there's a parallel message being sent that we're in the middle of a negotiation and you're attacking people. What are you thinking? All that being

10:49 Perhaps accurate. I still hesitate to have 100 percent faith that he's getting always the best information. And I say that because some of the people that have his ear that we know are neocons. His secretary of state is Marco Rubio, who sat on the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence while Russiagate was going on and put out a report saying that Russia did collude with Trump and interfered in the 2016 election. We know that's false. So some of his inner circle are people I will never trust.

11:17 And Sebastian Gorka being the best example, I watched him speak in San Diego two years ago in person. And Gorka sat there and spent 30 minutes railing on the exact opposite stance on why we, like what the colonel just said about why the war in Ukraine started. Sebastian Gorka blames everything on Russia, Russia, Russia. This guy has Trump's ear and it bothers me. So I always look at when Trump says something, is it kabuki or is he getting the best intel?

11:47 We know his National Intelligence Council. We had to fire 100 of them just last week. And a lot of these people were around for the first Trump 1.0. And they're the ones who basically orchestrated impeachment 1.0. So, no, I don't trust the information he's getting. So can I make an observation here? Because my research has been almost.

12:12 exclusively focused around the National Security Council. They have played a pivotal role since post-World War II in orchestrating all of the gladiolus. And I think Trump has chosen to keep a certain element of people that he already has pre-identified as parroting the talking points.

12:41 of the neocons so he puts them in the room with the people that are actually on his team most of which whose names you do not know because they are the what i would refer to as the patriots in and they have been like um tulsi gabbard they have been placed in positions of authority and he

13:05 He thrives on this. He listens to the neocons spout off what he knows the John Boltons of the world are saying. And he also listens to the real intelligence. And it's a kind of like managed chaos. So if you don't understand what your enemy.

13:26 And they are Trump's enemy. You're absolutely right, Brady. But if you don't understand what their agenda is and have them sit in front of you and mouth that agenda, you will never be able to defeat them. You have to have both of them let them slug it out. And he's going to do what's right. Very good for the background here. One of the other things we're seeing play out with this whole conflict, it is changing the nature of war.

13:53 I heard some comments last week that this is a giant testing ground for the future of military technology. I have a couple of interesting blurbs that I pulled out from just a few days ago. Yeah, but before you, I said, and not to cut you off, but I just want to, because I think the Colonel made a great point there. Remember when Trump reorganized the DNI, so it doesn't Tulsi Gabbard.

14:22 report directly to trump now like doesn't he doesn't he get the information it used to be that the information went through the cia to get to the president now it just comes directly from the dni and she reports straight to him so to that point i feel like a lot of these people he's put in place the sebastian gorkas who i don't trust either i don't trust any of these neocons he's put in his cabinet but i don't think he's depending on them to give him information i think he's put him out there because they're all television characters with name recognition and he knows they're going to go out there

14:50 and tow the party line in terms of the neocon uniparty. And that is a very damaging dynamic to the brand of the Republican Party. I think the Republican Party is in its death spiral right now, the same way the Democrat Party experienced a death spiral under Biden. But we can pivot to what you're about to say, Putin. I agree 100%. Real quick, a little side note about Gorka when he got done speaking in San Diego.

15:19 He was taking some questions out in the hallway afterwards. And I walked up and sort of started talking about Victoria Nuland and the Maiden Revolution. He could not get out of there quick enough. He wanted nothing to do with me. Really? Which I found very flattering. Yeah. You know, he's got this deep baritone British accent. And, you know, he's 6'4". I'm 6'3". And everything like that. So he likes to really have this commanding presence. He'll get really close to somebody and try to look down on them.

15:47 And you can't do that to someone who's his height. But anyway. All right. So we're talking about how warfare has been changing and a lot of it with the drone technology. Then there's some scary aspects to it. A couple of blurbs from different papers around the world. Russia stepped up missile and drone assaults on the Ukrainian capital of Kiev and other regions, killing at least 12 people overnight into Sunday after President Trump last week declined to impose further sanctions on Moscow.

16:19 over its refusal to halt its invasion russia attacked with a total of 367 drones and missiles one of the largest single night raids of the war according to the ukrainian air force and a second consecutive day of pounding strikes that sent civilians running for shelters in the middle of the night all right one more a little bit of statistics a year ago for 30 drones to strike ukraine in a single night was considered exceptional

16:48 Now Russia is saturating Ukraine's air defenses with hundreds of them. On May 25th, the Kremlin pummeled the country with what it's called a massive strike against Ukrainian cities, featuring 298 drones, probably a record. Okay. Last year, the Kremlin was producing around 300 Shahid drones a month. The same number now rolls out in under three days.

17:19 Ukrainian military intelligence says it has documents that suggest that Russia plans to increase its drone production to 500 a day, suggesting the attack swarms of a thousand could become a reality. There's a lot. Yeah, go ahead. Very perspective. You're shooting 360 missile and drones into civilian cities and you kill 12. Tells me that these are very, very precise attacks.

17:52 Yeah, I would agree with that. They're not hitting hospitals. Yeah, yeah. And you make a great point about this being like a laboratory for developing the next evolution in warfare and these drones that are flying back and forth. That attack that purportedly occurred against Putin as he flew into Kursk, it was like, I think they said they shot down like 49 drones or whatever.

18:24 pivoting to drone on drone warfare where the human element is is being just removed from the battlefield and um ukraine is really where at least at least narratively like what we're being told is that uh and there's videos out there of these drones flying in and there'd be two guys talking or a couple guys talking around a truck and then they see the drone coming and they run away and the drone tracks like chases them down and kills them um you know that is very very costly from from uh i would imagine from just an economic standpoint of not only the human

18:53 cost but uh the investment and training up these guys deploying them in the field and then you lose them um while they're sitting there you know plant like they're sitting there like planning out what they're about to do next and then a drone flies in this cheap little drone flies in and just kills them all it's like you know pull those guys further back away from the front line and send send other robots in to to do the dirty work that seems to be where we're transitioning to i had um um lieutenant colonel uh

19:24 oak mcculloch on my show a few weeks ago and we were talking about maneuver warfare we were talking about how uh uh because he was he's from the army and so he would uh train soldiers and tank warfare and we were talking about how we sent i think it was like 37 um abrams tanks to ukraine something like that and they've already lost most of them they've lost like i think it was like 20 of them something like that and

19:50 He said, to put that in context, we haven't lost that many tanks in the 25 years we've been in the Middle East. He's like, that is remarkable to lose that many tanks in less than a year is unheard of. And the reports that they're using them as pillboxes, meaning they're just stationary. You have these drones that are like videos of these drones flying in and taking out the tanks. They're just completely unprepared. They're not trained.

20:15 to be able to deal with the situation. And he said that maneuver warfare, the way maneuver warfare works is that you, you tell your command, your, your commanders in the field, what your end game is. You maybe give them a few milestones. You want them to achieve. And then you just let them go. And then they are, they're empowered to make their own decisions in the moment. They don't need to come back and ask, can I attack this guy? It's like, yeah, if you think you need to attack that guy, attack them, take the next objective and then move forward. The Ukrainians don't seem to have that ability.

20:43 They don't have that training. They don't have maybe the technical skill to drive the tanks. We have the stories of the F-16 pilots who spent two years training to fly the F-16s. And the moment they take off, they get shot down. There's just a total lack of skill from these human pilots, both tanks and aircraft. And so therefore, they're pivoting towards drones, not to mention...

21:09 go to the Houthis in Yemen, the Houthis are sending these drones and these missiles at these aircraft carriers that cost a fraction of what the missiles being sent to block them cost. And so every time they send a missile at one of these aircraft carriers that gets taken out in the sky, that is a significant cost the US military is paying to take out that drone, which is very cheap in the eyes of Yemen. And so that is establishing a military precedent that can be

21:39 adopted by other combatants around the world. And soon enough, you lose the economic war. And that's something that I know you can speak to, Brady, that if the war is not economically feasible, you're going to give up very quickly. Well, Gordon, that's exactly the point I was driving at when I brought this up. When I started mentioning how Russia's been able to increase its production of drones to make more in a day in a week than Ukraine can in six months,

22:09 The end result is very clear. It's clear. The scary part about this, and I'm glad you brought up the fact that these Houthi drones are attacking an aircraft carrier. Any country that has got, you know, they can spend a little bit of time and really ramp up production of drones, and you're going to become nearly unstoppable. And, you know, China... Go ahead. I was going to say, China's producing more goods than anybody in the world right now. You know, they don't have the ability to exert force overseas, right, or to project force overseas right now.

22:39 but that could change quickly and i start thinking back to that of chinese whatever weather balloon that went across the country and i've got all kinds of nightmares about this stuff we're talking about right now this future of warfare is scary potentially so i i want to kind of make an overarching comment um we're talking about battlefield tactics and potentially some operational level strategy but

23:08 If you step back and go up to the strategic level of operations in that theater right now, everything that you guys just discussed, I made the comment the first announcement that we were sending tanks and F-16s. They're sending targets. They're not sending capability because they don't have the technical capability to leverage the resources they are providing.

23:36 as ghost articulately laid out so we were sending targets over there to entice the and and rightfully so um the russians to attack those top um those targets so as they do that if you look at it from the 30 000 foot it makes russia look and this is nato this is nato doing this nato baited

24:05 the Russians in by attacking the ethnic Russians in the Donbass region. They assassinated over 10 mayors. They sabotaged schools. They burned people alive in cars. So they baited Russia in. They send targets over there that the Russians are going to have to take out. So they are defensively, offensively attacking Russia.

24:34 And it makes the entire thing, as we watch these videos that you guys were just talking about, of taking out these tanks and the aircraft before they are even able to get up to any operational capability. And I think that's strategic from NATO's perspective to make Russia look like more the aggressor.

24:58 And I think they are using that as a propaganda campaign against Russia. And they have the same thing with this attack. No one actually talks about the fact of what did they hit, right? Because if you look at what they hit, it's going to paint a completely different picture than, oh my gosh, there's just all of these drones flying in and missiles flying in.

25:26 I think taking the propaganda angle of all of this is that NATO, from my perspective, is the aggressor in all of this. And they are leveraging what we would consider outdated. And I want to make the comment about taking out those tanks. If NATO was serious about protecting Ukrainian military, we have jamming. There's no way those drones could get anywhere near them tanks.

25:56 We have the capability to jam every single one of them. They are allowing to happen what is happening in order to paint a propaganda picture. I'm reading that they do have the fiber optic upgrade, which makes it harder to jam. They're getting through some of that electronic warfare. But it makes some valid points there. I want to talk about the endgame. How do we see this ending? We've always known from the beginning that...

26:27 you know russia had the ability if they wanted to well as they're getting closer and closer to breaking through and uh ukrainian lines this has always been a war of attrition russia's been grinding them down you know they're the bigger of the economy west that's supporting ukraine doesn't have unlimited stocks and russia's in a wartime economy this war of attrition ukraine is losing the russians making gains across the front lines the worst case scenario for ukraine is that russia they don't get a piece and russia takes out odessa

26:57 effectively leaving the Ukraine as a backwater, landlocked, third-tier country stuck in the middle of nowhere. How do you guys see it ending? Assuming we don't get the peace that Trump wants. I'm not sure why Putin would agree to an immediate peace when he's still making gains on the battlefield daily. Yeah, and that's the point. The point that Lavrov's been making for a long time, and Putin as well, is that...

27:27 why negotiate a ceasefire when we're winning? He's like, so we're crushing you, Ukraine, NATO, and you want us to do a 30-day ceasefire for what purpose? To give you opportunity to reorganize, regroup, and then start this all over again in 30 days? He's like, no. If you want to negotiate a finality to the war, fine, but here are the terms. And the terms are the same terms we gave you back in 2022 that you agreed to with the...

27:55 Yeah, the Minsk Accords. And then Boris Johnson came in and convinced him to renege on all that. You know, the Russians pulled back from Kiev as part of that agreement. And then the Western media reported that as the Ukrainians driving them, pushing them back, which is which was nonsense. And so, you know.

28:19 They've already demonstrated a level of dishonesty and underhandedness where they were going to agree to something and then renege on that. So from the perspective of the Russians, why would you go back and negotiate another ceasefire? Trump was asked last week, or I guess maybe at this point it was a week and a half or two weeks ago, right before this whole deployment occurred about the attack on Kursk and attack on Putin. Do you have a red line in your head?

28:48 do you have a red line in your head as to like when you walk away from this situation? And he said, I do, but I'm not going to tell you what it is. But I do have a red line in my head where we do just walk away and just let it play out on its own. I think potentially we do see that happening because as you know, Brady, you're the one who taught me about Igor Kilimoisky years ago, back in 2022 and who he is. This whole thing, the might and coup was funded by who George Soros, Igor Kilimoisky, these.

29:17 Some of them are former Soviet KGB guys. Some of them are former Third Reich guys. There's a history, a hidden history that needs to be fully exposed and discussed. And the fact that we have Hebrew Banderites, when Igor Kilimoisky was running these Maiden Revolution rallies back in 2014, he...

29:45 was passing out T-shirts that said in Hebrew, Hebrew Banderite, which for those who don't know what that means, that means Jewish Nazi. So he was handing out shirts that said that. The guys who are running these militias, the Jewish 100 is one of them, the Azov Battalion, a lot of these guys are former IDF officers. You have a lot of former IDF officers who are now in Ukraine running these Jewish militias. They're flying Banderite flags. They're flying Nazi flags.

30:15 um the guys who are populating their their ranks are you know pro-nazi pro-hitler pro uh whatever like pro-bandera stepping bandera and that raises a lot of questions as to why is that like what is it about this situation that we don't understand what's the missing puzzle piece and

30:34 That's, I think, the itch that needs to be scratched and we need to unravel that thread fully because we don't understand. There's a history there, like a connection between Ukraine and Israel that we don't quite understand. And it has to do with the population that colonized Israel in the 1930s and 40s from Eastern Europe, a Russian Jewish population that came largely from Ukraine and Poland.

31:02 From that area, those ghettos, also came the Bolsheviks. So from the same ghettos that Zionism came out of and the Zionists came out of, you also got the Bolsheviks who went into Moscow and butchered the royal family. And that whole situation needs to be adjudicated. We need to understand where all of this came from, what was the true origin of it, and it goes way back, way further back than 2014. Way further back. And I want to just add that all of this is going on kinetically.

31:30 And the Gladio operations, which ironically, based on what Ghost just said, because that's how we ended up with Bandera and Stetsco in the Ukraine, they were trained by Otto Skorzeny and Galen's stay behind units. And they manifest themselves into the Azov Battalion and right sector. And what was the first thing Kolomoisky did when he became governor after the Maidan coup? He hired the Italian.

31:56 the entire Azov battalion and set them up on the border of the Donbass region and launched them as terrorists into the Donbass region. So all of this is tied together. And in the meantime, since 2022, you've seen the theater attack at the Krokus in Russia. They killed 140 people. And who did that? Oh, Gladio operators from the area of...

32:25 Tajikistan, training in Turkey with their Gladio operators and then deployed forward to Ukraine into that theater and they tracked them back to Turkey. So that's number one. Number two, they just assassinated a general with a car bomb. They are launching these terrorist operations into Russia as part of this entire thing as well. Russia is not going to quit. The end result is that

32:54 the donbass will remain exactly where it is today and they're going to accept that at nato um or putin's not going to stop that's to me the bottom line a little over a year ago gordon and i and the colonel wasn't able to make that show unfortunately we uh there was a german military call that was leaked where a couple of german military officers were talking about sending uh bigger and uh

33:24 bigger missiles to the Ukraine that had greater range, and they wanted to send those missiles into Russia to attack civilian targets. Just in the last week, Germany is beating that drum again, and they're saying, we want to hit Russian military targets. This is an escalation, and does it bring NATO into the war directly? Obviously, we've been in there indirectly the entire time.

33:54 It's a concern. It's one thing to hit strategic oil reserves or military depots and stuff like that. But when you start going after civilian populations, it's problematic. As the colonel pointed out earlier, the light casualties that we're seeing in Kyiv, despite all the bombardment, suggest that Russia is being responsible.

34:22 This is a concern on a geopolitical level. The last thing we want is for things to escalate. We want to keep it in theater. What's Germany's thinking? I mean, that's what I want to get to is the bottom of what do they have to gain? They're going to start their own people. Their most important trading partner is Russia for the natural gas because they gave up all of their ability to create energy and build windmills. So I don't know what Germany's thinking. It seems to me like natural suicide.

34:49 They want to destabilize Russia. The stated goal from a long time ago, going back to the Fabian Society, is the area of Russia will be divided. The western part of Russia will go to the EU and the eastern part will go to Asia. And that has been a stated goal this entire time. And these people are the disciples, the direct descendants of those people that have stated this as their end goal. They are destabilizing Russia.

35:18 in an attempt to take what is Russia. And it's been going on for a very long time when they tried it after the fall of the Soviet Union. They did it in a very covert way using the Hermitage Fund. They all wanted to rush in there and buy up pennies on the dollar, this whole recycling, going after Russian resources. This has been an ongoing effort for well over 100 years.

35:46 Yeah, the Eurasian landmass, you know, basically since 1990, that's been probably the number one topic at these think tanks around the world. They've been talking about quite a bit. I think once it was the Brookings Institute did a piece right around 93 that really laid out a lot of what we've seen, especially the dominoes going out of NATO. But again, I don't I don't see how Germany can sell this to their people, that this is in your best interest. You're already paying higher energy prices than anybody on the globe.

36:14 We already know that the pipeline was blown up Nord Stream. And there's no other way to get energy to Germany unless we're going to ship our liquid natural gas across the Atlantic, which makes it even more expensive. Extremely expensive. Yeah. And if you want to share my screen, this is one of the more famous pictures from Trump's first term. Hilarious picture. Love this picture with Trump and Shinzo Abe.

36:43 just staring down Merkel, and she looks like she wants to rip his head off. And a hilarious little moment here where he is sitting there eating candy, and he throws a piece of candy at her and says, here, have a piece of candy. This picture is from June 9th, 2018, so literally exactly seven years ago. And he's lecturing her on what you just described. He said, why should I, the United States, pay to defend you, Germany, in Europe?

37:13 From Russia, you have now negotiated trade deals that make you completely dependent on Russia for energy needs. That doesn't make any sense. You are completely beholden to Russia. If they wanted to crush you economically, they could do it overnight. Why am I paying to defend you from them? And that's what made her so mad. And selling it to the German people isn't working, which is why their nationalist party has made market gains.

37:43 um nato position is not popular in germany at all yeah yeah that's really good first of all i love the look of john on john bolton's face i know but yeah that's probably one of my favorite parts of that picture the alternative for deutschland aft just got a major court victory um they basically are they're gonna be they're actually gonna be allowed to be a political party um when it's surprising to see courts get something correct but um

38:12 They're not selling it to Germany. They're selling it to their little close-knit group of people that want to take over the world. To that point, anecdotally, we were talking before we went live about how I was just in Paris a few weeks ago. Walking around Paris, I only saw one Ukraine flag the entire time I was there. It was a sticker that an old man was wearing. He was definitely a tourist. Just looking at him, I could tell he was either from England or America.

38:41 But he was definitely not from the European continent. I could just tell looking at him. Other than that, I didn't see a single Ukraine flag. I see them from time to time, bumper stickers and stuff around here. It seems that the American public is bought way more into this conflict than the European public has because I didn't hear about this at all when I was over there. And I mean, I did hear people, my wife and I would start up conversations with people at cafes and we tried to go to places that were less tourist traps.

39:11 And, you know, they did not have a favorable opinion of Macron. I was definitely told many times that Bridget Macron has a penis many times. And, you know, to your point, I don't think the European public, generally speaking, is really into any of this. I think this is the European elites. Putin has said this multiple times. He actually Lavrov actually blamed the European elites for encouraging.

39:39 Kiev attack on Kursk and the one that caught Putin's helicopter in that barrage. Lavrov said that was all the EU elites doing that. So it seems to me like what we're getting is we're getting this dynamic, this drawn out situation where Trump said, I'm going to come in day one and Putin and I are going to negotiate peace and everything's going to be good. That hasn't happened to the detriment really of the European Union elites because they're now being isolated from their

40:08 constituents you know we know they don't really have constituents they just do whatever they want but they're being isolated now from the european public and exposed for their their corruption and the fact that they want this war no matter what we're going to fight this war even though they can't afford it they don't have the sort the resources they don't have the soldiers they don't have the equipment they don't have the money and they don't have the support publicly for it so um the longer that it goes on i think the worse it is for the eu and not only will this

40:36 It could potentially be the end of NATO. It could be the end of the European Union bureaucracy as we know it. Which would be nice. And I've said from day one, you cannot have an economic union without a political union. You will never get a political union in Europe because you have too many different cultures. But more importantly, the European mind virus that has always been to divide, conquer, take over lands and everything like that. That is still what's ruling in Brussels and across their capitals.

41:04 noble class of characters that have always been the ruling class and their descendants ideologically or biologically. They're still in place. The European people don't deserve that, but that's what they've lived under. We have not seen a successful occupation militarily basically since the 20th century. World War I and World War II taught us how costly it was to try to do land-based invasions. That's why we said never again and we started doing covert.

41:34 you know regime change as opposed to overt i don't understand the whole idea that russia wants to invade europe is one of the biggest fallacies we've ever heard it's not in their strategic benefit nor could they ever occupy a much larger europe european population and we've got all this new technology so what is europe's end game and i can only think it's we always goes back to a great reset crowd in new world order it all plays into that yeah yeah and

42:02 As we know, Russia can't be invaded. You can't invade Russia. You invade Russia, you're going to destroy yourself. It does seem like bleeding out Europe economically and the United States, the West really, is the end game here. That feeds right into the economic collapse aspect of all this.

42:23 Yeah, I would only add that I think we lost our appetite for the land-based invasions after Vietnam because we did do Korea and Vietnam. Like I said, we weren't successful. Yeah, right. But then we went exclusively covert. Yeah. Real quick, this is a one-minute video, and I think this video is worth watching because you asked, like, what's the endgame here? Here's Putin a few days ago meeting with a bunch of Russian businessmen, and it's in Russian, so I'll read the captions here.

42:53 But he says, let me silence it. So he says, it wasn't us who organized the coup in Ukraine. We constantly heard that democracy and the rule of law and elections are paramount. But they staged a coup, bloody coup at that. And they went full on, tried to conquer the Donbass and killing people with helicopters. They forced us to do what we're doing, what we're now doing.

43:29 And they're trying to make it look as if it's our fault and the next step. And it's no coincidence that I said that one of our greatest concern was software and cybersecurity. That's interesting. Just to pile on that. And of course, we also had financial institutions working actively to address this. And we had many of our people working in foreign companies.

44:04 I think that's pretty much you managed to collect resources that you needed. And that is good. So yes, that's the end of it. But basically he's talking about like software. He's talking about like, uh, economic warfare, cyber warfare, uh, fifth generation warfare. Yeah. And just to pile onto that, if anybody, everybody should go look up what's called the Prima Kov doctrine. That's P R I M A K O V.

44:32 Primakov is a bit of a mentor to both Putin and Lavrov. He's a very brilliant economic mind. But the Primakov Doctrine was written in the late 90s and basically established Russia's doctrine for international affairs and had three main pillars. And the first one was to get off the monopolar, to make it a multipolar world. But if you read through the whole doctrine and look at what Putin's actions and words have done for the last 20 years, it's been very consistent. The Primakov Doctrine is very reasonable.

45:01 and mature approach to foreign affairs from russia's perspective so maybe we'll have to uh we'll have to review that next time when we do one of these i'd like to go to that a little bit deeper are we ready to move on to our next hot spot yeah sure let's go all right let me do a screen share real quick okay i got it oh shoot sorry about that my apologies what's our next area that we're going to

45:40 We are going to the Kashmir region, the conflict between India, China, and Pakistan. Actually, China is not involved in the conflict currently, but I should do some quick background on that. This area was part of colonial, when India was part of the British Empire.

46:09 This was carved up just like they did them carved up the Middle East after World War one They carved up this area after in 1947 after World War two The Kashmir region is made of mostly Muslims about 65% and about 30 35% Hindus. However, it's the Hindu class that actually is with quote-unquote the ruling class They've been they've been clashing over this since 1947. There have been wars in 1971 1976 and again 1999

46:37 Most recently, there was a terror attack. Let's see if I have that document with some more details on that. 2019, there's a suicide bombing by Islamist group Jaish-e-Mohammed. It killed 40 Indian paramilitaries. India retaliates with new rules that stripped Kashmir of autonomy. Allowed outsiders to buy land for the first time. That really pleased the Hindu base and ticked off the Muslims because they didn't want outsiders' money coming in.

47:09 India retaliated with heavy security measures and crackdowns on militants. We just saw an April 26 terrorist, April this year terrorist attack on a place called Pahagam. This was blamed on the resistance front, which is also known as Laskar-e-Taba, another Muslim ill militant group. The Indian government claims they're backed by Pakistan. They killed 26 tourists. Modi was in Saudi Arabia at the time, flew immediately home.

47:38 Things have been very, very heated. Now they've backed off in the last week. What I'd like to talk about a little bit is not just the broad history that everybody knows, but really look at how that area got carved up. And, okay, here's the other map I wanted to show. The other thing India was talking about doing, and this is the real big threat, is cutting off the Indus River tributaries. Now this would be an absolute act of war because this Indus River feeds both Afghanistan and India.

48:11 and to a lot of their farmland. India currently does not have the capability of cutting it off. They don't have enough dams. They flood their own land, stuff like that. But this is getting very, very scary, especially when you consider these are two countries that have had nuclear weapons since 1998. So you guys, I mean, there is a fascinating background to what's been going on in everywhere from, you know, we just saw a regime change in Pakistan itself. And we can talk a little bit about that.

48:44 There's several areas. Overlying themes, it seemed that the regime changes are surrounding Modi in India in a pincer movement. That's exactly what it seems like. Destabilization. So, yeah, we've had issues in Myanmar, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, obviously Afghanistan and Iran. The only area that hasn't really seen any violence is China. And that's basically everybody around India.

49:17 So can we start with Bangladesh? Yeah, please. Since we've talked about Bangladesh before, the CIA, USAID, Bear Stooge Soros, all got involved in Bangladesh funding some very, and just so people who've not, are not,

49:47 aware of this, Bangladesh used to actually be what was referred to as East Pakistan. So after World War II, they basically had surrounded the northern perimeter of India with Pakistan, which was created. It wasn't even a country prior to that. But they didn't just create Pakistan proper. They created on the west. They created East Pakistan on the eastern.

50:15 So now they're on both sides. That eventually turns into Bangladesh. And they had a very nationalistic leader in charge of Bangladesh that just got overthrown. And a radical person, very friendly to the West, was basically installed in Bangladesh. That's a strategy of tension, a destabilization to co-opt the border.

50:43 India and there again it's like what what Brady said a pincher movement in order to be able to effect control and so people need to understand that this is not just about India and Pakistan this is a much bigger thing to your point about the nuclear

51:02 capability of Pakistan. If you go back to the BCCI, the Bank of Credit and Commerce International that was set up originally by a Pakistani, it's touted as a Pakistan bank, but it was really administered out of the city of London in conjunction with the UAE. And that bank was

51:29 funded in large part by Saudi Arabia, the old regime in Saudi Arabia. And so that becomes critically important because they were central to the trafficking of nuclear capability material out of the state of Texas. And CIA use in front companies were caught giving India nuclear capability technology. And that's very well documented.

51:58 And so the presence of India in that location has led to a lot of destabilization of the surrounding area. And that's kind of what I talk a lot about, that these countries that were created after World War II, Ukraine, we're going to talk about Pakistan and we're going to talk about Israel. And there's no better way to describe that than they become the pockets of destabilization in those areas in which they can launch operations from.

52:29 There's a bit of a pattern, isn't there? A little bit. Yeah, there's a great... I'm trying to pull it up real quick. There's an article that has... There's a story that's unfolding that I was sent by some of the authors and I've been talking to them a little bit and they're still working on it. But I think it was George Magazine put it out. Maybe Gateway Pundit was the one who published it. But it has to do with...

52:59 It has to do with the Georgia GOP, which is its own story, but the Georgia GOP being infiltrated by this group that's connected to Pakistan and Bangladesh. That's its own little scandal that we don't need to get into. That's a separate conversation. But there does seem to be some sort of a weird connection between these NGOs that operate in Pakistan and Bangladesh that are connected to the Republican Party, specifically in Georgia.

53:29 and this like jihadi network that is probably cultivated run by the cia um as far as what's happening on the ground or why this would be happening uh there's plenty of reasons to speculate um that the importance of that region i mean kashmir it seems like what's happening is all these little hot spots around the world ukraine gaza kashmir taiwan they're all being um

53:58 irritated right and and they're all being kind of like uh the hornet's nest is all being are being kicked everywhere in order to uh try to antagonize and catalyze world war three and if they can kind of start these little uh proxy wars everywhere the proxy wars can bleed together and become world war three right so if you want to share my screen we can talk about

54:24 the International North-South Transport Corridor. Yeah, before you jump into that, one of the things I want to point out is, you may be saying this, but one of the major things I wanted to point out is just about every barrel of oil that gets to China has to sail around the Cape of India. That's a very military, big mobility militarily. China and India are natural rivals. They're the two most populous countries in the world.

54:52 There's a big difference between our two populations. Almost every country in the world had a baby boom after World War II. But the only two major economies that had an echo boom, because you had a baby boom, you had a smaller generation, then you had an echo boom. The only two places that had the echo boom were the United States and India. So India's population is going to continue growing. China went to the one child policy. Their population is diminishing. This is a major economic problem because the way economies are set up.

55:21 It's the younger generations that have to be able to support the older ones. And these two are natural rivals for many reasons, but those are a few of them. Go ahead, Gordon. Well, I was going to say, you're right about that. You may recall back in 2022, there were some border skirmishes between China and India where soldiers were killed. I think it was 22, maybe 23. It looked like, I mean, I remember Steve Bannon talking about it on War Room where it looked like that.

55:50 There might be a conflict between India and China and that India might become the like a two front war where they would be fighting China in the east and Pakistan in the west. And, you know, that kind of, again, feeds into what what we're talking about, these proxy wars. A lot of that hostility has been smoothed over in the past year because of Putin. Putin brought Xi and Modi together. They have been establishing bilateral agreements.

56:20 MBS in Saudi Arabia has been another player who's been kind of bringing China and India together. As you mentioned, Modi was in Saudi Arabia. They were announcing new bilateral trade agreements. I can't help but see all of that as connected, as it's all connected that this multipolar world order as Putin and Xi and Modi have come to call it is emerging. And that is obviously a direct threat to...

56:50 The global hegemony to the unipolar establishment, you know, the status quo and the the the international north south transport corridor is one of the best examples of how that that functions. And if you if you share my screen, I'll show you this map that highlights how this works. And this is probably one of the better one of the better maps that that demonstrates that the blue line.

57:18 is the status quo. This is how you, this is how you ship goods from Mumbai and India to Europe is through the blue line. It comes through the Suez canal and it takes a 40 to 60 days. The new route that has being, that's being established by this multipolar world order, um, is the orange route and it takes 25 to 30 days and it comes up through, instead of going through the red sea, it comes up through the Persian Gulf. Um, they, they, uh,

57:48 unload at Bandar Abbas, this port that has had billions of dollars invested in it in Iran over the past couple of years, including the Saudis. The Saudis actually have been investing heavily in Bandar Abbas. That's very significant considering the fact that Saudi Arabia and Iran have been enemies historically, especially since 1979. MBS has talked about that.

58:15 That was like the fulcrum year, as he calls it, from when the ideological arms race in the Middle East where who can be the most extreme? Who can be the most orthodox? And Iran says, all right, we're going to close down movie theaters. And Saudi Arabia says, oh, yeah, we're going to close down cafes. Oh, yeah. Well, men aren't allowed to speak to women anymore in public. It's like who can be the most.

58:40 the most pure Islam, the most pure form of Salafi Islam. And that's what's really driven the radicalization of the Middle East in the 1980s. So undoing all of that, which we've seen happen over the past couple of years, has been a critical aspect of diffusing this World War III bomb and this transport corridor, focusing on prosperity, offering people a chance to pursue.

59:05 wealth and pursue prosperity as opposed to achieving it through warfare is a major element in all of it. And so if you look at this map, the disruption of this corridor can be achieved through Kashmir and trying to provoke a war between Pakistan and India. And if you can get China involved, all the better. But that's a big element of all this. And I was trying to find, there was a clip of

59:34 the Pakistani defense minister right after the, right at, right after that, that attack happened where the, where he came out and he was doing an interview and he said, you know, like the whole jihad thing was, is a creation of Western intelligence. And he said that, that, so if you want to take it Colonel and say, speak on that, I'll see if I can find it. Well, and that's the point that I was going to make a couple.

1:00:02 you guys mentioned the the long feud between um china has a memory that's a thousand years long and they've never still forgotten the boxer wars that were originated by the uk using indian opium into china um and the influx of opium and um the the drugging of the chinese people that is that was something that um you here discussed um also the

1:00:31 The use of Pakistan was pivotal to the 1970s overthrow of the King of Afghanistan and the destabilization of Afghanistan. And Brzezinski is famous for saying that they were going to give the Soviet Union their Vietnam. They went through a lot of machinations to draw Russia into Afghanistan.

1:01:00 um basically for opium opium explodes in Afghanistan and we all know that that money is used to fund covert operations worldwide and so where did they set up all of the opium labs for the Afghanistan in Pakistan because they have been funding um the ISI for a very long time

1:01:24 And again, because they have a network inside of Pakistan in order to create these al-Qaeda, the Mujahideen in Afghanistan, ISIS, all spawned.

1:01:42 by western intelligence entities to transition from 1991 the fall of the soviet union boogeyman into radical islamist terrorism being the new boogeyman that they are going to unleash on the world to control domestic populations you know looking at the map that gordon showed us and i pulled up the primakov doctrine um basically this is it's from the carnegie endowment uh one of our favorite

1:02:14 But here's their summary of the Russian Primakov doctrine, their foreign policy. It says, number one, Russia should strive toward a multipolar world managed by a concert of major powers that can counterbalance U.S. unilateral power. Number two, Russia should insist on its primacy in the post-Soviet space and lead integration in that region. Number three is Russia should oppose NATO expansion. Well, that's all played out over the last 20 years.

1:02:42 I bring this up because yesterday the colonel and I were going through our secret societies. We ended up talking about China. And it's very interesting. Some of these one world government types are deeply embedded in tightening our relationships with China at the highest levels, including the universities, their seven talents, all that sort of thing. It seems like we have two opposing visions. We have a one world government vision versus the multipolar vision. And China, which direction they go, seems to be might be the deciding factor.

1:03:13 They're definitely pivotal to that conversation. Yeah. Yeah, that's a really, really good point. And, you know, the origin of this, I don't know if it's the origin, but there is an origin story here in this Kashmir conflict that goes back to the 1830s and involves the East India Company, where the East India Company, that valley where Kashmir is located, was critical for shipping goods from the east to the west.

1:03:42 and controlling that. And in order to have that proxy war, I think it was the Sikh-Anglo War of the 1830s, the East India Company had to destabilize it. And so that really began this major conflict that I believe fed into the war that they had in India in the 1850s, which led to the collapse of the

1:04:13 of the operations there and the rise of the Raj British government, which ultimately led to the dissolution of the East India Company in 1873. Because you have in 1833, through an act of parliament, they stripped the East India Company of their commercial license. And basically for 40 years between 1833 and 1870,

1:04:41 1874, when the East India Company is officially dissolved, they did not buy and sell goods anymore. They were no longer engaged in trade. They were only engaged in proxy war. They were only engaged in raising armies and overthrowing governments in and around India. And when they finally dissolved in 1873, 1874, at the same exact time, through an act of parliament, the War Office created what eventually was later called British Intelligence.

1:05:11 At that time, the East India Company had a standing army that was twice the size of the British Army. The British Army, I believe, was like 120,000 strong and the East India Company was 240,000, 250,000. And so they basically gave that to the Raj and they gave that to the.

1:05:33 Probably, I would imagine, to British intelligence. I know we've talked about this before, Brady, but my theory is that East India Company became British intelligence. They reinvented themselves, and they realized that the real value in what they were doing with their espionage and their proxy wars, all the tactics they had developed in the 1700s and the 1800s in India.

1:05:57 um trying to gain control of these resources because the cultures there the civilizations there were far more sophisticated than what they found in the new world and in um africa uh they had to buy buy off warlords and get them to kill each other in order to maintain control over the resources they took those tactics and those were the tactics that became operation gladio and became the playbook for regime change operations in the 20th century so so a lot of that was cultivated in

1:06:27 Kashmir in that Sikh-Anglo war. And I think what we're seeing now play out is the irritation of those old wounds. It's hard to say if the governments are actually behind this. Is the Pakistani government behind this? Right here on the screen, I have the comments from the Pakistani defense minister where he's saying that during the Soviet-Afghanistan war, which you just mentioned, Colonel, in the late 1980s,

1:06:56 Pakistan became a platform for training and indoctrinating the jihadists on behalf of the West. He said the minister noted his country was a springboard for the Soviet-Afghan war. Quote, the introduction of jihad, which was invented by the West, changed the country's ethos and led to its current situation or current issues. The whole ethos of the society was changed to support the jihad, Asif said. And according to him, during the war in Afghanistan, Islamabad.

1:07:19 quote, supplied all sorts of help to the U.S. later post 9-11 attacks. Pakistan again joined the coalition from our soil. All the supplies used to go that used to go to us in all the facilities, he said. The minister added, however, both of these wars, in my humble opinion, were not our wars. And so he's he's saying that we took we took the easy money. We took the money from the West. And in exchange, we basically indoctrinated our children and allowed them to become, you know.

1:07:46 soldiers and proxy wars that did not benefit our interests. And for people who want to say that this stuff goes back, jihad goes way further back than the 1980s, I would implore you to look at how quickly our own children in America have been indoctrinated with communism over the past 20 years. It only takes one generation really to indoctrinate a civilization and fundamentally change the way they look at politics.

1:08:13 And if you do it with enough force and enough money, you really can make a big difference in just a few short decades. Absolutely. And Brady's famous for saying your description of the difference between when they were officially.

1:08:35 sanctioned by the British government and when they weren't, they're still doing the same work. It's whether or not they have the letter. So they're pirates if they don't have the letter and they're official people of the government if they do, but they're still engaged in the exact same operations. Yes. One of my favorite quotes, difference between a pirate and a privateer is a piece of paper. Yeah. All the pirates, all the pirates that we know, all the famous ones, but just piracy in general, they all started as naval captains.

1:09:04 mostly in the British Navy, but also in the French Navy. And they basically said, all right, you're now going to attack Spanish ships and steal their gold. That's your job. And eventually they were like, well, why am I bringing the gold back to Europe? Why don't I just take the gold and go live on an island? Although I think a lot of those guys continue to secretly work for certain interests. You're actually touching on a topic that Carol quickly discussed in Tragedy and Hope.

1:09:30 the difference between the land-based armies and empires and the maritime-based. And we've been touching on that topic quite a bit over the last few years we've been doing shows together, but we ought to maybe schedule some time in the future to really dive down deep into that. Yeah. Gordon, the next frontier in that discussion, by the way, is space. And General Quast just did that big interview with Sean Ryan where he touches on that.

1:09:57 The way he described it to us at Gart was that, you know, we are, space right now is, we, the United States, are basically, we have our toes in the sand, our feet in the sand, sitting in a chair on the beach, like in Europe, looking out over the Atlantic Ocean. And China is already on ships in the new world, setting up colonies and preparing to bring the resources back. And we're sitting here like lollygagging, not even thinking about.

1:10:24 like why why aren't we on ships going over there getting you know getting our own stake stake over there and and that's how he views space and uh and and mining it essentially interesting i didn't have questions whether that'll happen in our lifetime but technology comes quickly i'm gonna get a question one of the things that i've been reading pretty consistently about why india is so ticked off in china

1:10:50 It has to do with the Belt and Road Initiative and what's known as the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor. I got a blurb here. It says it passes through Gilgit-Baltistan, and they've invested over $62 billion in infrastructure, escalating tensions with India, which considers it a violation of its sovereignty. I was not aware that – is my map wrong? Does China and Pakistan even share a border? What exactly is that economic corridor they're talking about?

1:11:19 do we have any maps on that at all there's a map of it and that's a very big thing and that's the reason why um you're hearing all of this rhetoric now about the taliban um if you listen to any show whether it's the sean ryan interview there's taliban's bad taliban's bad taliban's bad i'm not saying they're good but the taliban leadership in afghanistan has began attending meetings to tap into that corridor um for their own

1:11:48 diversification away from what was dictated to them to be the major product originating from Afghanistan, which is opium. And they view tapping into that Pakistan corridor as critical to the next step in the evolution of bringing Afghanistan back into being a normal country. And for those of you who don't know,

1:12:14 The late 1990s running into 2000, the Taliban is the one that changed the entire dynamics of Afghanistan. The Russians were gone. Most of the chaos created as the CIA had occupied Afghanistan via the ISI in Pakistan had kind of won because they had moved a lot of the operations to Latin America.

1:12:41 um the taliban had decided that they were going to ban the production of opium no more opium if you get a chart that charts the capacity of the they were up to in the 90s as far as the largest supplier of opium to the world and while the cia was associated with them

1:13:00 So the Taliban takes over. They bring it down to like single digit thousands of production of hectares of opium. And so it's not at all coincidental that as that production capacity goes down to almost nothing in the year 2000, what happens the next year? 9-11. And where do we go? Afghanistan. Where did the CIA put bin Laden?

1:13:30 Afghanistan. And that becomes the reason to go back in there. And what happened after 9-11 with our re-entrance into the Pakistan-Afghanistan area is the opium production skyrocketed. I mean, like more than they had ever produced before. And that is not a coincidence. Yeah. And then to build on that, because that's an excellent point, the Doha agreement.

1:14:00 Donald Trump's President Trump signed with the Taliban during his first term. And the crux of the agreement was we're going to give Afghanistan back to the Taliban. And in exchange, Taliban, you're going to hunt down and kill any terrorists who operate on your soil. And basically what happens is they come back, they shut down the opium production. And then what happens? America gets flooded with fentanyl. So then all of a sudden, the deep state is pivoting from.

1:14:30 Opium, because if you look at the chart you're referencing, the Taliban are driven out of power in Afghanistan. The CIA takes over. They drive up opium production. All of a sudden, the American markets get flooded with opium. I have many friends, close friends who died of opium overdose in the past five years. We get a lot, or I'm sorry, they died of fentanyl overdose in the past five years, but they were addicted to opium.

1:14:59 And everyone probably has been touched by this in some capacity, like the opium issue that we have in the United States. And to answer your question, Brady, if you want to share my screen one more time, Colonel, here is the China-Pakistan economic corridor. Here's a map that shows you that Pakistan and China do share.

1:15:23 a small border, that territory directly beneath where the green and orange are touching, that's Kashmir. So that's the Kashmir area that we're talking about where all of these attacks and this conflict is unfolding. It's right there, right next to what we're talking about. And then look at this, Council of Foreign Relations behind China's gambit in Pakistan. And here they are attacking the Silk Road and attacking the...

1:15:51 major projects of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor. And there it is. So this area right here off to the right that is in the light gray, that's Kashmir. And that's where we're having these proxy wars now. Friendly reminder that almost the entirety of Pakistan's

1:16:17 military brass and intelligence are trained by the United States. Yeah. So that's, that's a major data point when we're talking about that entire Eastern border or Western border of Pakistan is Afghanistan. So they can tap into that economic corridor and completely change Afghanistan and reestablish it as a functioning country. And they do not want that to happen. And, and by the way,

1:16:46 Abbey Gate, the attack on Abbey Gate when we were pulling out of Afghanistan, the guys who went and bombed Abbey Gate and killed those 13 US soldiers, they were ISIS-K. ISIS-K is the Pakistan affiliate of ISIS. So they were out of Pakistan. I distinctly remember the way that it was being communicated to the American audience is that Americans were led to believe that somehow the Taliban were responsible for this. Well, months later, it was the Taliban who went and hunted those guys down and killed them.

1:17:15 On behalf of Donald Trump, because they said, we told Donald Trump, we gave him our word that we were going to kill any terrorist who was operating on our soil. These guys came to our soil and blew up that gate. So we went and killed them for you, Donald Trump. And say what you want about the Taliban. They are men of honor because they kept their word to a president who was no longer in power and didn't appear at the time to be returning to power anytime soon.

1:17:39 And you watch every single one of these talking heads that tell you a story about the Taliban. They won't tell you the story about the Taliban. And I keep notes and I keep posting them. Oh, look, another Taliban story. Oh, look, another derogatory Taliban story because they are continually deriding. And I'm not suggesting the Taliban's great, but they do not present a balanced view.

1:18:08 of what the Taliban has done for Afghanistan and America. They do not present a balanced portrayal. Before we move on, I do want to make one other comment. We were looking at the pincer movement. The one border area we did not talk about was Nepal. And Nepal has a big piece of the northern border of India.

1:18:34 And you think, well, Nepal's not been in the news, so I'm sure that's fine. Except the CIA overthrew the royal family and assassinated them. When? In 2001. Here, let's share my screen again and let's show the audience because I like maps. Let's show the audience what Nepal is and where it is. OK, so the JK, you see JK right here. That's that's Jammu and Kashmir. So there's Kashmir again. Just to give you some bearings. Here's Nepal.

1:19:04 Nepal is on the border. It separates China and India. And if we were to pull up, like if you can see the topography here, there's a major shelf. There's this big shelf. The elevation drop here is significant. As I understand it, Colonel, I don't think airplanes fly over this area. I think airplanes fly around this area because the elevation is so high that it's not safe. The Himalayas, right? Yeah, the Himalayas, exactly.

1:19:33 Yeah. So it is critical that the CIA went in there and positioned themselves in between India and China. Because if you understand what we were doing in Nepal, Nepal is where they were training the Uyghurs to be militant terrorists in attacking China from the inside.

1:19:58 the the tibetans the cia picked them up and flew them into colorado and trained them to be terrorists to attack china from the inside they have done this destabilization of both china and india and this has been going on for decades this is not new that's actually something that matt air has has talked about many times in our show is that um

1:20:21 Like we are not being told the truth about the whole Uyghur situation and that they are like the proxy group that is used as the bludgeoning tool against China. And that's why they're presented to the Western audience as like the sympathetic figures. Just same way with the Tibetans. Interesting. And that's all been declassified. I mean, those documents are out there where we actually were training Uyghurs in terrorist training camps after we couped Nepal because the king wouldn't have anything to do with us.

1:20:56 Yeah, yeah. And that's such a good point that the average American walking around probably views the Taliban and ISIS and Al Qaeda as all the same thing. But as guys like that kid, Lord Miles Rutledge, as he calls himself, I don't know if you're familiar with this guy, this young kid who travels the world and he documents it on social media. Yeah, he's hilarious. But he was that kid who years back went to Afghanistan, was there when the whole collapse happened, gets arrested by them.

1:21:25 And like CNN's reporting on it, they're like, this kid is dead. And then it turns out that he was actually in jail. He ingratiated himself with the Taliban, became friends with them. He's gone back multiple times. He has like a better diplomatic relationship with them than I think the State Department does or did under Biden. And, you know, he explains it as when he was in jail, they would bring ISIS guys in that they had just arrested. And these guys would be British.

1:21:51 And they wouldn't know anything about the Koran. They would be like, oh, really? What's your favorite passage from the Koran? And the guys couldn't even name a single passage from the Koran. They were just radicalized idiots, like useful idiots that had been recruited from other places like Britain, brought over and then just, you know, given money and said, all right, go be violent. And do you know what the CIA did in the United States? They targeted black Muslims to radicalize them in subsidized.

1:22:20 Islamic worship centers throughout the United States. I just read a book about this. It was fascinating. They were targeting Black Muslims to do exactly the same thing. Ship them over there, send them to terrorist training camps, and employ them in Afghanistan. That probably takes us to the Middle East then, Brady.

1:22:42 Yeah, I was going to say, let's take it home. And so let me give you the background of the conflict in the Middle East. You guys have about 20 years. Digest version. Yeah. Right now, there's an awful lot of talk about the I think the story that really brings it brings us home to me was the rumor that Trump basically called Netanyahu and told him to zip it while they were trying to negotiate with Iran.

1:23:11 Because Netanyahu was threatening to actually unilaterally strike Iran. And Trump told him to back the heck off. Now, that's the short version of it. I'm going to take a step back. Middle East is Gordon's bailiwick. So take it away and tell us what's going on. Yes. So you hit it right on the head. Trump, that clip the other day that went viral of him. And I don't know if we have it. Let me see if we can pull it up.

1:23:41 of trump being asked that question it was judge janine pirro's uh swearing in as the u.s attorney for uh the district of columbia and during during the the little short little press conference and prompt to press conference they had somebody asked about um about whether you know it's being reported in certain outlets that you told netanyahu to back down and not attack iran

1:24:07 Is that true? And then Trump had this like moment of hesitation. He's like, do I want to disclose this right now? Yes, I'm going to disclose it. Yeah, that is true. I did say that. I did tell him, I said, it wasn't, he's like, I didn't, I didn't yell at him. I just said, you know, it's not, it's not in your best interest right now. That's the soft, like that's the soft disclosure. Like we're, we're, the pivot has now begun something that I've been postulating for years now that, that we're going to see is, uh, I think Trump has.

1:24:34 very strategically put these people in his cabinet who may or may not end up being earnest actors, may or may not end up being quote unquote white hat good guys. But all of them almost to a T are pro Zionist, pro Netanyahu, pro let's go to war with Iran. And the talking points that they're putting out or have been putting out is basically to back Netanyahu no matter what. And if he wants to go to war with Iran.

1:25:01 Absolutely. Let's go to war with Iran. It's neocon 2.0. This is George Bush 2.0. It's everything Donald Trump has spoken out against since the Iraq war, since 9-11. He has always said invading Iraq was a big mistake. Jumping into the Middle East was a big mistake. It was a trap. And the fact that he's repeating those mistakes, or at least narratively he is, has always been a signal to me that that's not actually what's happening.

1:25:31 Now, all of a sudden, you're getting Mark Levin and Laura Loomer are now lashing out at President Trump because of this apparent pivot. Why are we not attacking Iran? Why are we not going to war with Iran? Why are you going to negotiate with them and give them a nuclear program after backing out of Obama's nuclear deal? Well, Obama's nuclear deal was really a money laundering deal. That's all it was.

1:26:00 They already have a nuclear reactor. They have a nuclear reactor that was built in 1975. We, the United States, built it in Bashir, Iran, and the Soviets helped them maintain it. So they already have a nuclear reactor. The reason that they are enriching uranium is for that nuclear reactor. And in order to enrich uranium for a civil nuclear program, you enrich, as I understand it, to 3% to 6% enrichment.

1:26:24 In order to get a nuclear weapon, you need 90% for a military-grade nuclear weapon. However, with enough material enriched at 20% to 60%, you can make a dirty bomb. You can make some form of a bomb. That's the official narrative as far as the science goes, as I understand it, the Reader's Digest version. And so the allegations have always been is that they're enriching at higher levels and that they are...

1:26:52 amassing materials to build a bomb. I asserted back in June of 2023 when this question came up and the Middle East was totally peaceful and quiet at that time that we were going to get a development where they were going to say, we need to strike Iran before they nuke Israel. That's going to be necessary. It's going to start World War III. And I argued then at that point that Iran has reported,

1:27:21 Russia has reported, others have reported that they have hypersonic missile technology. They have the technology to penetrate the Iron Dome. They don't need a nuclear weapon to attack Israel. If they wanted to attack Israel, they would fire missiles at their water treatment programs or centers at their electrical plants. They would make it unlivable to stay in Israel. They don't need to destroy the cities, just make it so they can't have clean water and they basically have to abandon Israel.

1:27:47 Or it becomes some sort of a prisoner camp, the way that Gaza kind of is. And it becomes a humanitarian disaster. And they've demonstrated last year, last April, when they fired those missiles into Israel, they all penetrated the Iron Dome. They struck harmlessly in the desert. And Iran said afterwards, they hit their targets. We weren't intending to kill anybody. I think the only person who was injured was somebody was hit by like a piece of debris that fell out of the sky.

1:28:17 And so they demonstrated we have the ability to penetrate the Iron Dome. We have the ability to strike Israel anytime we want. We don't need a nuclear weapon to destroy Israel. And so this idea that we have to strike Iran before they get this nuclear warhead, which we've been told now for a year, but really for about 30 years, that they're two weeks away from a nuclear weapon. Because you can go find footage of Netanyahu in 2002.

1:28:44 telling Congress that they're months away from a nuclear weapon in the 1980s, saying that they're months away from a nuclear weapon. This has been the talking point forever. And the fact that you have this, I describe them as Mossad media. That's just my description for them. But, you know, it's Mark Levin. It's Larry Loomer. I even throw Charlie Kirk and those guys into it because Charlie Kirk is shilling very hard for a conflict with Iran.

1:29:11 Whether those people are actually in the umbrella nexus of Mossad remains to be seen, but they certainly are carrying their water and they're certainly promoting their narrative. And they certainly have been bending over backwards ever since Trump went to the Middle East three weeks ago. They've been bending over backwards to cast Qatar as the bad guy and Qatar as.

1:29:36 the financial backer of the infiltration of the U.S. government. And Mark Levin in particular has been saying that Putin is the most evil man in the world and that we have to fight him no matter what. And so that's all to say that those people seem to be pushing for war more than anybody else, whether that war is with Russia and Putin or with Iran. They want war. They are the warmongers.

1:30:06 ostensibly are the people who are closest to President Trump in terms of like media figures. And I think that's by design. I do, too. Go ahead, Carl, please. Well, I wanted to draw an analogy. So people don't think that this is like some far fetched fantasy. I did quite a few shows and obviously I interviewed the.

1:30:32 one of the USS Liberty survivors. So I've dug deep into that whole area of the conflicts that Israel has been in. So to draw an analogy to what Ghost just said is that's the exact same rhetoric that was used.

1:30:52 for the 1967 war against Egypt. The exact same thing. They spent months. They're going to attack us any minute. They're going to attack us any minute. And they preemptively attacked Egypt because they wanted to overthrow Nasser. Nasser had kicked the British out and taken back the Suez Canal management and the Western oligarchs were all pissed off. And so they knew, and I know they knew.

1:31:21 And I'll tell you why in a second. They knew that Egypt had deployed 75,000 army people to Yemen because the British staged a false flag there and drew them into Yemen. They had the Saudi Arabians attacking from the north. They were attacking out of Aden and trying to do a pincer movement on the...

1:31:48 the holdouts in Yemen that wanted Aden back, the port there that the British had controlled for 100 years. So with their false flag there and the deployment of the Egyptians down there, they knew that that was the time to attack the summer of 1967. So they do all of this rhetoric going, oh my God, they're going to come in. But Egypt had bought a really interesting system called...

1:32:17 crypto ag which was an encryption device owned by the cia covertly with the german b d crypto ag and we know specifically that egypt was using it to communicate to jordan and all of their embassies around the world

1:32:34 And the CIA was sharing this information with Israel to make sure that they were at their most vulnerable point when they launched that attack because the CIA monitored every single cable out of Egypt at the time. So they knew there was no attack imminent. They knew it because they monitored every cable out of Egypt. And yet...

1:32:58 We were willing to sacrifice an entire ship and all the American crew in order to stage a false flag to bring not just Israel into the overthrow of Nasser because they viewed him as such a threat in the area. But we wanted to join Israel in the attack on Egypt, and we were going to use the sinking of the USS Liberty as a justification for doing that. That's why all of this is so dangerous. They will stage events.

1:33:28 Israel and the CIA will stage events to endanger American military and our citizens abroad in order to draw us into conflicts. Yeah, and there's such a good point about the USS Liberty. I'm in Virginia. There's a convention, I think, happening down in Norfolk, or maybe it already happened earlier this month, but at a hotel where all the survivors of the USS Liberty are getting together and having...

1:33:56 like a memorial or whatever. And so there are survivors that are walking around who will tell the stories that they go on podcasts and they tell the stories about the, the Israeli planes and they're sitting there like sunbathing on the, on the deck and they're waving at the planes and the planes will start firing on them over and over and over and over and over again and just killing them. And, and they're like, what the hell is going on? And, you know, for those listening who are skeptical about all of this, here's a fun exercise.

1:34:25 Go to X and look up Tim Pool, USS Liberty. Go look up Charlie Kirk, USS Liberty. When those guys are asked about the USS Liberty, they freak out and they start screaming at the person to shut up. Stop talking about it. That's a lie. It's a conspiracy theory. It's a conspiracy theory. And then they really like they take the mask off and they're like, dude, you look indistinguishable from somebody on CNN. And so that to me speaks to Masada Media. Tim Pool, by the way, was exposed like a month or two ago.

1:34:54 When Netanyahu came to town to meet with Trump a few months back, he he like at like 1030 at night, Tim Pool, who's up in West Virginia, not very far from D.C., went to D.C., met in secret with Netanyahu and a few other people. It was all supposed to be off the record. And then somebody reported on it. And then he had to kind of own up to him. Like, yeah, I met with Netanyahu at night. Like, big deal.

1:35:20 That's a totally normal thing for one of the biggest podcasters who never was kicked off YouTube. All this competition was kicked off of YouTube, but he never was. Totally normal for him to go meet with the prime minister of Israel and then to go out and to totally simp for Israel and say the USS Liberty was a conspiracy theory. But I digress. I've got something for you real quick on Liberty before you move on. This is something the colonel and I brought up a couple weeks ago during one of our shows on Secret Societies.

1:35:48 there's a gentleman by the name of paul warrensky he was the general counsel for the secretary of defense in 1967 on u.s liberty and he was right there he said i found it hard to believe that it was in fact an honest mistake on the part of the israel israeli air force units so that's about the highest source you could possibly want yeah if you go back and research operation cyanide which was what that

1:36:14 um was called um we were definitely going to join the effort of taking out nasser we had b-52s on deck um in the united states ready to take off once it was confirmed that the liberty had been sunk it is a very evil evil

1:36:32 um and like gordon said they did surveillance flights for overnight they they they sur they buzzed the um ship for so long they isolated the signals because it was a reconnaissance um intelligence reconnaissance ship they they surveyed so they knew exactly where to send the um the torpedoes when they did the second wave with the torpedo boat

1:36:57 in order to take out the equipment because of what the equipment was overhearing off the coast of their operations as they went into egypt which by the way just recently they found mass graves of egyptian soldiers that had been killed the day before they bombed the liberty

1:37:14 And they knew that that information had been picked up by the liberty. I mean, mass graves of hundreds of people with their hands tied behind their back. They were executed and they were buried in unmarked graves. And they found them doing a construction project. And they were all Egyptians. And that is.

1:37:36 speculated as being the reason why they chose that specific day to do that specific mission although it was already planned because they had transmitted that information already back to rear stations if you understand how that collection works everything that they translated on that ship was sent to other stations they didn't destroy the information that information went somewhere and they knew exactly what they were doing

1:38:02 Interesting. Yeah. And Matt Eritz explained how the British had bombers on standby in Cyprus to launch. Had that escalated, had the ship been sunk and the Egyptians had been blamed for it, then the U.S. would have said, we got to go to war with Egypt now. And the British had bombers on standby to take off from Cyprus and bomb Egypt. And that would have kicked off a major war.

1:38:27 And do you know the part that's never talked about? And it's in that book, Operation Cyanide, that there was spotted by some of the crew members, a Russian, bring it back full circle, a Russian submarine that came up to the surface and was watching all of it happen.

1:38:49 And they believe that's why the last round that was going to finally sink the Liberty was called off. They already had the planes launched. They could see them coming in to do the finishing touches. And they turned around and went back because someone on one of those torpedo boats told Israel that there was a Russian sub.

1:39:11 Interesting. Interesting. It's also worth noting that that was I'm looking up the date. I want to make sure I get the exact date right. June 8th, 1967, during the Six-Day War. So there was a six-day war that where this is where Israel invaded the West Bank, Gaza and the Sinai Peninsula, which is Egypt.

1:39:29 And took control of all of them. Obviously, they maintain, like to this day, there's a military occupation of the West Bank. The military occupation of Gaza ended in 2006 when Hamas came into power. And then the military occupation of the Sinai Peninsula ended, I think, 10 years later in the 70s when they normalized relations. After they overthrew and poisoned Nasser. Exactly, exactly. I'm going to shift a bit and share an observation.

1:39:57 If you look at the United States, look at the radical left. They are adamantly pro-Ukraine, but adamantly pro-Hamas or anti-Israel more than anything else. You look at the neocons and the neolibs, our warmongers. They are very much pro-Ukraine, but pro-Israel. There's a bit of a conflict there. And normally the media is the one painting the narrative for both.

1:40:24 But it's a very interesting split there. I bring it up to help us bring us home with the following question. You know, Israel is another one of those countries that was carved up by the Anglo-American Empire with imaginary lines, even though some of them go back to biblical times. I get that. But it was basically created by the Anglo-American establishment. They are surrounded on all sides by ideological enemies.

1:40:49 The best case scenario is one of these days that something like the accords that Trump was working on ends up everyone being friends and it becomes a great prosperous trading scenario. More likely scenario is these people will never get along and this is something we're going to keep hearing about for the next 2,000 years. With that in mind, this Zionist regime, Gordon, you mentioned earlier how many Israelis we have fighting in the Ukraine war. What is the connection between the two if you want to bring this home?

1:41:17 Yeah. So the connection between the two is the fact that, as I mentioned before, the colonists who colonized Israel all come from the ghettos of the Soviet Union or Imperial Russia, rather, known as the Pale Jewish Settlement, which was established by Catherine the Great in 1791. She was a dear friend of the American founding fathers of Benjamin Franklin. And then it was dissolved in 1917.

1:41:47 by the Bolsheviks who came out of the Palos settlement and were hired by Western oligarchs to kill the Russian royal family. And if you look at, if you want to share my screen, let me, let me pull this up. I will, I can connect you to the Israeli mafia. So in the 1980s, you had the collapse of the Soviet union was imminent. It was obvious to intelligence agencies. They understood this was going to happen.

1:42:17 There is a guy who ran the mafia in Ukraine. His name was Simeon Magolovich, and he needed a way to get his money out of Ukraine. And so he went to Robert Maxwell, Ghislaine Maxwell's father, who helped establish Mossad's network of little helpers around the world who helped Mossad do their operations.

1:42:47 And he said, you know, the best thing you can do is you can take your money and bring it to Israel. Israel has the most lax banking laws, banking regulations, because we want foreign investment. And it's the easiest way to launder money is to launder through Israeli banks. So this guy did that. Robert Maxwell gave him an Israeli passport. He got it through his contacts in the Israeli government. If you want to share my screen, this is Simeon Magolovich.

1:43:15 He's considered the Brainy Don is his nickname. Now, in 2010, there was a Ukrainian intelligence officer who was arrested by the Ukrainian law enforcement and brought into court because he had destroyed all the files that the Ukrainian intelligence services had on this guy because this guy is Ukrainian and Israeli. That guy, his name was Oleksandr Tershenov.

1:43:44 This guy, just by just by coincidence, after the mighty coup occurs in February of 2014, this is the guy who's installed as the interim president by the CIA for like, whatever, five months until they could organize a new election. And, you know, like anoint like a new president. This is the guy who was installed as as president of Ukraine temporarily. And he, of course, is like a lieutenant in the Israeli Jewish mafia.

1:44:12 And he's an agent in the SBU, which is Ukraine's CIA. So there's a connection there. There is a network that extends. Magolovich, by the way, was the number one supplier for the Gambino crime family for ecstasy. So he was making all the drugs, shipping them to Brighton Beach in New York. And they were being dispersed to all the nightclubs and everything in New York. That was Magolovich doing that for the Gambino crime family.

1:44:40 So this is a major crime ring. This guy is an unknown entity, mostly. He has connections to some of these gas companies that are connected to the Biden family, that are connected to Pelosi's kid, that are connected to a lot of these scandals that Zelensky and Trump have touched on in some of their phone conversations. And I would also say that to bring us home,

1:45:11 Why is Trump backing ostensibly Netanyahu? And what I've come to find, Brady, is that there are two guys in Israel who are the opposition leaders to Netanyahu. Their names are Yair Lapid, who is a former television news anchor turned politician. He's in the Knesset, which is their Congress. There's another guy named Naftali Bennett. Now, Yair Lapid, he started a new political party in 2018. He's kind of considered like a centrist center left.

1:45:40 Naftali Bennett is considered he considers himself 10 degrees right of Netanyahu. And it's important to understand that the right left spectrum in Israel is all socialists. They don't believe in small government. They're all big government. It's just are you a communist or are you a fascist? The both of them were temporarily they've made this political alliance in 2021 in order to kick Netanyahu out of power.

1:46:09 And they were like co-prime ministers for 18 months from June 2021 until December 2022. They were co-prime ministers. First, it was Naftali Bennett for 12 months, and then it was Yair Lapid for six months. The only reason that Netanyahu was able to get back into power and to get enough support in the Knesset to become prime minister again is because he went and made an alliance with people who had been considered.

1:46:36 They had persona non grata back in the 90s. They were considered too radical and too extreme to serve in the Knesset because their ideology included Jewish supremacy. And so they passed a law in 1994 that said, if you are a Jewish supremacist as part of your political platform, you cannot serve in the Knesset. These are the guys whose constituencies are in those settlements that are in the West Bank.

1:47:00 So in December of 2022, here's the story. Netanyahu supports canceling law, banning races from the Knesset. So he makes this unholy alliance with Itamar Ben-Gavir, Bezalel Smotrick, Israel Katz. Part of the deal was, all right, if we're going to support you, Netanyahu, you got to make us part of your security cabinet. And that's exactly what he does. And so now the security cabinet is those guys. Here's Bezalel Smotrick, the minister of finance. Here's Itamar Ben-Gavir.

1:47:29 national security minister, Israel Katz. He's now the defense minister, was the minister of foreign affairs. The most radical people in Israeli politics are now in his inner circle and they are firmly in control. They want war with Iran. They want greater Israel. They want to conquer all the adjacent countries. And what I've learned is that Yair Lapid and Naftali Bennett are far more reasonable when it comes to...

1:47:53 Pretty much every single issue, including Palestine, they've openly said, if you put us back in charge, we'll make a two-state solution. We'll cut a deal with Palestine. We'll recognize their national sovereignty. We'll give them a country. But the two things that those two guys said that they will not do, their red line is, number one, they will never allow Saudi Arabia to have a nuclear energy program, ever. They're never allowed to have a nuclear reactor, which MBS said is absolutely one of his hard lines. He wants one. Number two,

1:48:23 War with Iran. We have to have a war with Iran no matter what. My theory is that had those guys forced Netanyahu out, they would have put the public to sleep because they are very good statesmen. They're good politicians. People would stop paying attention to Israel and we'd wake up one day, we'd be in a war with Iran. Netanyahu is a fantastic villain. He's like straight from central casting. Everybody hates Netanyahu. He is like Hillary Clinton on steroids, but for Israel. And so I think Trump.

1:48:51 keeping him propped up, keeping him center stage. It keeps all the eyeballs focused. It keeps the, you know, Nick Fuentes and all of them frothing at the mouth, like pointing the finger at Israel and saying, everyone pay attention. So everyone is focused on Israel. Everyone is watching Israel at all times, expecting a war with Iran. And so his hands are kind of tied. If he does, if he does a war with Iran, they're going to know it's like, everyone's going to know that it's, that it's, it's no good. It's not like a legitimate.

1:49:21 If he doesn't do a war with Iran, these guys who I just mentioned are going to resign from office, which is going to cause the government to collapse. Netanyahu's political career ends, and he has three pending felonies from 2019 he's going to be prosecuted for. He's definitely going to go to jail for those felonies. So he is in a total pincer move, over-leveraged politically, and I think Trump has designed that.

1:49:45 to keep him in place because he's the ultimate villain he brings everybody's attention to israel and ultimately i think the point of doing all this what's the point of doing all this the point of doing all this is is this right here let me play this clip

1:50:01 And then I'll rest my case. Here's a two minute clip from Ben Shapiro. I forgot to mention him earlier when we talked about Mossad media. This is what you're going to see, I think, from all the people who are dishonest in this emerging new media space who everyone thinks are like, oh, this is the new alternative media. Listen to what Ben Shapiro says here. So a kind of shocking story from Axios yesterday emerged that suggested that President Trump had cautioned Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in a phone call last week.

1:50:30 not to take any action that could jeopardize negotiations between the United States and Iran on a new nuclear deal. Okay, so first of all, I have a question. Israel is not involved in those negotiations. So why should Israel hold off? Real question. Israel is the country most under threat from Iran, not the United States. Okay, so if we were going to take the full scale, J.D. Vann's isolationist realist position, shouldn't the United States just sort of wash his hands and walk away and say whatever happens, happens? But I noticed that's not what's happening. Instead,

1:51:00 These so-called restrainers inside the administration, they're not attempting to restrain the United States, which is already restrained. I promise you, my 100% certitude is that President Trump is not going to authorize a bombing raid on the Iranian nuclear facilities. Whether or not we should, I don't think it's going to happen. Okay, that's just the reality. So why is the restrainer team inside the Trump administration trying to stop Israel from doing that thing? Why? With what bad deal? Iran keeps saying openly they will not stop enrichment.

1:51:30 And yet the United States is so desperate for a deal. What? For the sake of a deal. The Iranians know this, which is why they're pushing. And so when Trump warns Netanyahu not to go and do anything about Iran, just trust us. OK, listen, I will trust that President Trump will cut a good deal if he continues to maintain the Trump 1.0 stance, which is no nuclear enrichment at all. No nuclear facilities at all. That was something that three weeks ago the Trump administration was saying. President Trump himself. Again, I'm with Trump 1.0 on this.

1:51:59 not Steve Witkoff and J.D. Vance 2.0. Donald Trump 1.0 killed Qasem Soleimani, destroyed the Iranian economy, and held them in check. Then Joe Biden came in, reversed a bunch of that stuff, and you got October 7th and a vast regional war. Why wouldn't we just go back to Trump 1.0? That is the foreign policy that actually shaped the Abraham Accords. Why is that not the thing? Instead of calling the prime minister of Israel and telling him he needs to restrain himself on Iran.

1:52:30 So there you have it. And the whole point of what he's saying there is that the purpose of the Abraham Accords was this. The way that Trump sold the Abraham Accords to the neocons and to the Zionists was you're going to get World War III out of this because you're going to turn the Arabians, the Arabs, against the Persians. The blessing and the curse. This is from last summer when he spoke at the UN. And he said, join us in this war against Iran, everybody. We're going to go fight Iran.

1:52:59 Join us. And now Trump is rug pulling that whole thing, lifting sanctions against Syria, making peace with Iran. And he's doing that with the help of the Arabs. And yeah, so Leslie Stahl on 60 Minutes, I have that clip. We won't play it. She said that the expectation is that the Saudis are going to step in and pressure Trump to go bomb Iran. No, they're not. They're the ones who came out yesterday and said, do not bomb Iran. We want peace in the Middle East. So now the Saudis are standing firmly.

1:53:29 with the Iranians, their longtime enemy. And Netanyahu is the one who got rug pulled. And now I think you're going to see all the frauds in the new age media, like the new emerging media, like Shapiro, Levin, Loomer. They're all going to expose themselves because they're going to lose their minds saying we have to have a war. Why won't you give us war? Shapiro let the mask slip a little bit at the end of that clip when he said a vast regional war that's going on. I'm sorry.

1:53:56 Who's Israel? Has anybody declared war on Israel yet? No. To this Zionist, I don't even know if that's 100% the Zionist take, but for these people, the Shapiros of the world, in their mind, Israel is at war with the world. That is a Zionist. That is very much a Zionist position. I just didn't want to pigeon all of them into Zionism. You can pigeon them all in there.

1:54:22 Yeah, yeah. And I would as well. I would say that is the Zionist position. And the Zionist position is that when he says the Trump 1.0 position, that's Jewish supremacy. He's like, we want Jewish supremacy in the Middle East. Nobody gets a nuclear energy program. Nobody gets to enter the golden age. You could all live in caves and be primitive cavemen.

1:54:42 And you can have your donkeys and you can have your camels, but you don't get to join the rest of the world in the golden age. You can be primitive cavemen. And in time, we will crush you with our superiority, like our superior military strength that the United States is giving us. But the Steve Wyckoff, Steve Wyckoff, by the way, is Jewish. So is Adam Bowler. So are a number of people who are behind the Trump administration doing this to Israel, putting them in this pincer move. So when you say the Zionist position,

1:55:11 I would 100% agree with you, Colonel. The Zionist position is Jewish supremacy over the Middle East. And it's a rug pull. Go ahead. You notice the pattern back from the Fabian Society of the African continent. You can supply us with all of your stuff, but you are going to be enslaved for the rest of the time.

1:55:37 to us the elite you just see this pattern with this mentality repeat itself over and over again and where did the state of israel come from the city of london and i was going to say something very similar my version of it is you look at marxism you look at fabianism you look at zionism they're all fruits from the same hegelian tree and it's about how the ruling elite are going to capture the world's resources for themselves

1:56:04 maintain the monarchical system or say the aristocratic system that they've always wanted. It's why they detest the middle class. That is definitely what the one world order, the new world order, it's all the same theoretical blood. I mean, you trace it all the way back. So, yeah. Those are your last thoughts. Gordon, you do yours.

1:56:26 Yeah, I'm sorry. I know I've dominated the conversation here. No, no, no. I have nothing to add. You covered everything. This is this is your area of expertise. And thank you for adding everything that you did. No one can say it better than ghost. The the like five years ago, 10 years ago, even two years ago, I think a lot of Americans would have bought into the idea that we can't like the the the Arab Muslim world is irredeemable and that.

1:56:54 ben shapiro is right and that it's incompatible with western culture and we have to crush it that's the only way to deal with them is through strength right that's why what happened three weeks ago in saudi arabia is so significant because that speech that donald trump gave in riad when he threw the middle finger up at the republican party and said

1:57:12 Like we are not doing this the way the Republican Party wants to do this. We are doing this through the way that the Arabs want to do this because they have the right mentality and they want to do this the right way. And those images of MBS, you know, putting his hand on his heart and smiling big. I think he is so important in all of this because he helps sell the idea that these people are very reasonable and that we can be friends with them. They are not the crazy radical zealots that the CIA and the Republican Party and Fox News has told us.

1:57:42 We can be friends with them. Yes. And that sums up everything that this show has been all about. Thank you both for being here. This is such an amazing opportunity to illustrate to everyone that will see this, what is really going on. And the measure that these people will go to, sacrificing, we didn't even bring up the Las Vegas.

1:58:12 attempted takeout of mbs um and the sacrifice that was done there um orchestrated they will stop it there's not any number on any limit to the amount of dead bodies that will be laying in the path of this um hagel is so appropriate um brady thank you for adding that because it does start with that mentality so thank you all um

1:58:42 brady for and goes for being here today um this this is truly an amazing show yeah let's do it more often yeah absolutely absolutely thank you for having me uh yeah it's always fun to get together with you all and um compare notes and um i feel like there's always a lot of great uh great great material that um that that is presented so thank you yeah there's a synergy to your area of expertise what i've been researching and

1:59:10 the economic aspect that Brady brings to all of these discussions. So I love doing these shows. Let's talk about Syria. Let's talk about Syria soon. That's a fun one. That that's a goofy, that is a goofy cartoon happening in Syria right now, but yes. Anytime. All right. Cheers everyone. Thank you guys.

Entities here

Claims made here

Ukraine attempted_assassination_of Vladimir Putin host_asserted ▶ 1:57

“And Trump said, I had not heard that. Which brings up the question, why did we know about that? To be precise, Putin was visiting one of the regions near the border, and the Ukrainians had sent a mass…”

CIA overthrew 2014 Ukrainian coup host_asserted ▶ 3:51

“articulate the point Warhamster made about the sharing of intel from day one. You can define day one in 2014 after the CIA couped Ukraine because the CIA has been embedded in Ukraine since 2014. And t…”

CIA funded Royal Institute of International Affairs host_asserted ▶ 4:18

“in Ukraine since 2014, that in the immediate aftermath of the coup that they orchestrated, along with the International Republican Institute oversaw by John McCain at the time, that USAID, the CIA, an…”

CIA funded International Republican Institute host_asserted ▶ 4:18

International Republican Institute headed John McCain host_asserted ▶ 4:18

CIA funded USAID host_asserted ▶ 4:18

CIA operated_in Poland host_asserted ▶ 5:07

“That New York Times article talked about the CIA setting up underground intelligence facilities along the Donbass region. So just adding to that, not only is the CIA currently has 17 different bases o…”

CIA operated_in Donbass book_quoted ▶ 5:07

Iran attempted_assassination_of Donald Trump host_asserted ▶ 9:50

“The fact that he was assassinated last summer, or the attempt was made on his life, and then weeks after that, we got the story that it was Iran who did it, and his response to that was, if Iran did t…”

Marco Rubio member_of Church Committee documented ▶ 10:49

“Perhaps accurate. I still hesitate to have 100 percent faith that he's getting always the best information. And I say that because some of the people that have his ear that we know are neocons. His se…”

Tulsi Gabbard appointed Donald Trump host_asserted ▶ 12:12

“exclusively focused around the National Security Council. They have played a pivotal role since post-World War II in orchestrating all of the gladiolus. And I think Trump has chosen to keep a certain …”

Sebastian Gorka appointed Donald Trump host_asserted ▶ 14:22

“report directly to trump now like doesn't he doesn't he get the information it used to be that the information went through the cia to get to the president now it just comes directly from the dni and …”

Russia carried_out_attack Kiev documented ▶ 15:47

“And you can't do that to someone who's his height. But anyway. All right. So we're talking about how warfare has been changing and a lot of it with the drone technology. Then there's some scary aspect…”

Oak McCulloch member_of US military host_asserted ▶ 18:53

“cost but uh the investment and training up these guys deploying them in the field and then you lose them um while they're sitting there you know plant like they're sitting there like planning out what…”

Houthis carried_out_attack US military documented ▶ 21:09

“go to the Houthis in Yemen, the Houthis are sending these drones and these missiles at these aircraft carriers that cost a fraction of what the missiles being sent to block them cost. And so every tim…”

NATO targeted_for_regime_change Russia host_asserted ▶ 24:05

“the Russians in by attacking the ethnic Russians in the Donbass region. They assassinated over 10 mayors. They sabotaged schools. They burned people alive in cars. So they baited Russia in. They send …”

NATO assassinated Russia host_asserted ▶ 24:05

Boris Johnson convinced Ukraine host_asserted ▶ 27:55

“Yeah, the Minsk Accords. And then Boris Johnson came in and convinced him to renege on all that. You know, the Russians pulled back from Kiev as part of that agreement. And then the Western media repo…”

Ukraine reneged_on Minsk Agreements host_asserted ▶ 27:55

George Soros funded Ukraine Maidan Revolution host_asserted ▶ 28:48

“do you have a red line in your head as to like when you walk away from this situation? And he said, I do, but I'm not going to tell you what it is. But I do have a red line in my head where we do just…”

Ihor Kolomoisky funded Ukraine Maidan Revolution host_asserted ▶ 28:48

BND trained Roman Shukhevych host_asserted ▶ 31:30

“And the Gladio operations, which ironically, based on what Ghost just said, because that's how we ended up with Bandera and Stetsco in the Ukraine, they were trained by Otto Skorzeny and Galen's stay …”

Right Sector manifested_from Stepan Bandera host_asserted ▶ 31:30

Otto Skorzeny trained Roman Shukhevych host_asserted ▶ 31:30

Otto Skorzeny trained Stepan Bandera host_asserted ▶ 31:30

Azov Battalion manifested_from Stepan Bandera host_asserted ▶ 31:30

BND trained Stepan Bandera host_asserted ▶ 31:30

Ihor Kolomoisky launched Azov Battalion host_asserted ▶ 31:56

“the entire Azov battalion and set them up on the border of the Donbass region and launched them as terrorists into the Donbass region. So all of this is tied together. And in the meantime, since 2022,…”

Ihor Kolomoisky hired Azov Battalion host_asserted ▶ 31:56

Azov Battalion carried_out_attack Krokus City Hall attack host_asserted ▶ 31:56

Vladimir Putin blamed European Union host_asserted ▶ 39:11

“And, you know, they did not have a favorable opinion of Macron. I was definitely told many times that Bridget Macron has a penis many times. And, you know, to your point, I don't think the European pu…”

Yevgeny Primakov mentor_to Sergey Lavrov host_asserted ▶ 44:32

“Primakov is a bit of a mentor to both Putin and Lavrov. He's a very brilliant economic mind. But the Primakov Doctrine was written in the late 90s and basically established Russia's doctrine for inter…”

Yevgeny Primakov mentor_to Vladimir Putin host_asserted ▶ 44:32

Jaish-e-Mohammed carried_out_attack Pahalgam documented ▶ 46:37

“Most recently, there was a terror attack. Let's see if I have that document with some more details on that. 2019, there's a suicide bombing by Islamist group Jaish-e-Mohammed. It killed 40 Indian para…”

Lashkar-e-Taiba carried_out_attack Pahalgam host_asserted ▶ 47:09

“India retaliated with heavy security measures and crackdowns on militants. We just saw an April 26 terrorist, April this year terrorist attack on a place called Pahagam. This was blamed on the resista…”

Pakistan backed Lashkar-e-Taiba host_asserted ▶ 47:09

USAID funded Bangladesh host_asserted ▶ 49:17

“So can we start with Bangladesh? Yeah, please. Since we've talked about Bangladesh before, the CIA, USAID, Bear Stooge Soros, all got involved in Bangladesh funding some very, and just so people who'v…”

George Soros funded Bangladesh host_asserted ▶ 49:17

BCCI administered_in London host_asserted ▶ 51:02

“capability of Pakistan. If you go back to the BCCI, the Bank of Credit and Commerce International that was set up originally by a Pakistani, it's touted as a Pakistan bank, but it was really administe…”

BCCI funded_by Saudi Arabia host_asserted ▶ 51:29

“funded in large part by Saudi Arabia, the old regime in Saudi Arabia. And so that becomes critically important because they were central to the trafficking of nuclear capability material out of the st…”

China targeted_for_regime_change India host_asserted ▶ 54:24

“the International North-South Transport Corridor. Yeah, before you jump into that, one of the things I want to point out is, you may be saying this, but one of the major things I wanted to point out i…”

Vladimir Putin did_business_with Narendra Modi host_asserted ▶ 55:50

“There might be a conflict between India and China and that India might become the like a two front war where they would be fighting China in the east and Pakistan in the west. And, you know, that kind…”

Saudi Arabia invested_in Bandar Abbas host_asserted ▶ 57:48

“unload at Bandar Abbas, this port that has had billions of dollars invested in it in Iran over the past couple of years, including the Saudis. The Saudis actually have been investing heavily in Bandar…”

United Kingdom carried_out_attack China host_asserted ▶ 1:00:02

“you guys mentioned the the long feud between um china has a memory that's a thousand years long and they've never still forgotten the boxer wars that were originated by the uk using indian opium into …”

Henry Kissinger proposed Soviet-Afghan War host_asserted ▶ 1:00:31

“The use of Pakistan was pivotal to the 1970s overthrow of the King of Afghanistan and the destabilization of Afghanistan. And Brzezinski is famous for saying that they were going to give the Soviet Un…”

Pakistan used_for Soviet-Afghan War host_asserted ▶ 1:00:31

United States funded Mujahideen host_asserted ▶ 1:01:24

“And again, because they have a network inside of Pakistan in order to create these al-Qaeda, the Mujahideen in Afghanistan, ISIS, all spawned.…”

United States funded Al Qaeda host_asserted ▶ 1:01:24

“And again, because they have a network inside of Pakistan in order to create these al-Qaeda, the Mujahideen in Afghanistan, ISIS, all spawned.…”

United States funded ISIS host_asserted ▶ 1:01:24

“And again, because they have a network inside of Pakistan in order to create these al-Qaeda, the Mujahideen in Afghanistan, ISIS, all spawned.…”

East India Company carried_out_attack Kashmir host_asserted ▶ 1:03:42

“and controlling that. And in order to have that proxy war, I think it was the Sikh-Anglo War of the 1830s, the East India Company had to destabilize it. And so that really began this major conflict th…”

East India Company split_off_from MI6 host_asserted ▶ 1:05:33

“Probably, I would imagine, to British intelligence. I know we've talked about this before, Brady, but my theory is that East India Company became British intelligence. They reinvented themselves, and …”

East India Company trained Operation Gladio host_asserted ▶ 1:05:57

“um trying to gain control of these resources because the cultures there the civilizations there were far more sophisticated than what they found in the new world and in um africa uh they had to buy bu…”

Pakistan trained Mujahideen host_asserted ▶ 1:06:56

“Pakistan became a platform for training and indoctrinating the jihadists on behalf of the West. He said the minister noted his country was a springboard for the Soviet-Afghan war. Quote, the introduct…”

United States supplied_arms_to Mujahideen host_asserted ▶ 1:07:19

“quote, supplied all sorts of help to the U.S. later post 9-11 attacks. Pakistan again joined the coalition from our soil. All the supplies used to go that used to go to us in all the facilities, he sa…”

Taliban overthrew Afghanistan host_asserted ▶ 1:12:14

“The late 1990s running into 2000, the Taliban is the one that changed the entire dynamics of Afghanistan. The Russians were gone. Most of the chaos created as the CIA had occupied Afghanistan via the …”

Taliban assassinated ISIS host_asserted ▶ 1:16:46

“Abbey Gate, the attack on Abbey Gate when we were pulling out of Afghanistan, the guys who went and bombed Abbey Gate and killed those 13 US soldiers, they were ISIS-K. ISIS-K is the Pakistan affiliat…”

Israel targeted_for_regime_change Gamal Abdel Nasser host_asserted ▶ 1:30:52

“for the 1967 war against Egypt. The exact same thing. They spent months. They're going to attack us any minute. They're going to attack us any minute. And they preemptively attacked Egypt because they…”

United Kingdom carried_out_attack Yemen host_asserted ▶ 1:31:21

“And I'll tell you why in a second. They knew that Egypt had deployed 75,000 army people to Yemen because the British staged a false flag there and drew them into Yemen. They had the Saudi Arabians att…”

Israel carried_out_attack USS Liberty attack host_asserted ▶ 1:33:56

“like a memorial or whatever. And so there are survivors that are walking around who will tell the stories that they go on podcasts and they tell the stories about the, the Israeli planes and they're s…”

Paul Warrensky exposed USS Liberty attack host_asserted ▶ 1:35:48

“there's a gentleman by the name of paul warrensky he was the general counsel for the secretary of defense in 1967 on u.s liberty and he was right there he said i found it hard to believe that it was i…”

United States funded Operation Cyanide host_asserted ▶ 1:36:14

“um was called um we were definitely going to join the effort of taking out nasser we had b-52s on deck um in the united states ready to take off once it was confirmed that the liberty had been sunk it…”

Russia spied_on USS Liberty attack host_asserted ▶ 1:38:27

“And do you know the part that's never talked about? And it's in that book, Operation Cyanide, that there was spotted by some of the crew members, a Russian, bring it back full circle, a Russian submar…”

Israel carried_out_attack Egypt documented ▶ 1:39:11

“Interesting. Interesting. It's also worth noting that that was I'm looking up the date. I want to make sure I get the exact date right. June 8th, 1967, during the Six-Day War. So there was a six-day w…”

Catherine the Great founded Pale Jewish Settlement documented ▶ 1:41:17

“Yeah. So the connection between the two is the fact that, as I mentioned before, the colonists who colonized Israel all come from the ghettos of the Soviet Union or Imperial Russia, rather, known as t…”

Bolsheviks dissolved Pale Jewish Settlement documented ▶ 1:41:17

Bolsheviks assassinated Romanov family host_asserted ▶ 1:41:47

“by the Bolsheviks who came out of the Palos settlement and were hired by Western oligarchs to kill the Russian royal family. And if you look at, if you want to share my screen, let me, let me pull thi…”

Robert Maxwell funded Mossad host_asserted ▶ 1:42:17

“There is a guy who ran the mafia in Ukraine. His name was Simeon Magolovich, and he needed a way to get his money out of Ukraine. And so he went to Robert Maxwell, Ghislaine Maxwell's father, who help…”

Robert Maxwell laundered_money_for Simeon Magolovich host_asserted ▶ 1:42:47

“And he said, you know, the best thing you can do is you can take your money and bring it to Israel. Israel has the most lax banking laws, banking regulations, because we want foreign investment. And i…”

Simeon Magolovich member_of Gambino crime family host_asserted ▶ 1:44:12

“And he's an agent in the SBU, which is Ukraine's CIA. So there's a connection there. There is a network that extends. Magolovich, by the way, was the number one supplier for the Gambino crime family f…”

Oleksandr Turchynov member_of SBU host_asserted ▶ 1:44:12

Yair Lapid member_of Knesset documented ▶ 1:45:11

“Why is Trump backing ostensibly Netanyahu? And what I've come to find, Brady, is that there are two guys in Israel who are the opposition leaders to Netanyahu. Their names are Yair Lapid, who is a for…”

Yair Lapid relationship_with Naftali Bennett documented ▶ 1:45:40

“Naftali Bennett is considered he considers himself 10 degrees right of Netanyahu. And it's important to understand that the right left spectrum in Israel is all socialists. They don't believe in small…”

Benjamin Netanyahu relationship_with Itamar Ben-Gvir documented ▶ 1:47:00

“So in December of 2022, here's the story. Netanyahu supports canceling law, banning races from the Knesset. So he makes this unholy alliance with Itamar Ben-Gavir, Bezalel Smotrick, Israel Katz. Part …”

Benjamin Netanyahu relationship_with Israel Katz documented ▶ 1:47:00

Benjamin Netanyahu relationship_with Bezalel Smotrich documented ▶ 1:47:00