Operation Gladio - UK

1:51:17

auto-scroll word highlight

Transcript

0:00 Okay, let me get my co-host up here and let's see. Oh, snow's in the house. Watch out. Y'all need to be on your best behavior. Dad's here. Oh, Frog's here too. Yes. Love it. Love it. Love it. All right. So, I am going to...

0:36 ask, just because we're all family now, up front, given the news that, and I know Frog's going to want to say something, that Julian Assange has been released in a dumbass deal, but at least he's released. If anybody wants to comment on that before we get started. Bridget, Cousin It, either of you?

1:05 I just passed Froggy the mic. I don't know if he's busy. But I think it's really great that Assange is finally out. And there's a lot of question as to why he's on a private plane. And the telegram channels are stating he's on a private plane because he did not want to land anywhere that he would be in a situation like Snowden.

1:34 So he had to take a private plane. And actually what I just and I don't know, you may be absolutely correct. But what I read was they actually wanted to fly in a commercial aircraft so that there would be not that there's less chance of it being blown up.

1:59 They were told they were not allowed to and they just got stuck with half a million dollar bill for having to. It was mandated that they fly on that charter flight. OK, well, you might be you might be a couple of steps ahead. I had to step away for about an hour and everything just changes in that hour. Exactly. In another hour, it'll be different. Well, well said. Well said.

2:29 SR-71, what do you got to say? Well, first of all, I am thankful that they finally come to their senses, even though it's 15 years too late. But the question I want to ask is, of course, he's going to the Azores, the Azores territory. It is a territory of the United States. Am I not under the assumption, or is my assumption not correct, that laws of territorial grounds are the same as they are in the U.S.?

2:59 No, Azores is not a territory of the U.S. It's a territory of Portugal of which we have a base on. I'm sorry. Azores belong to Portugal. Yeah, I'm sorry. It wasn't the Azores he was going to. It's someplace close to... Is it the Mauritan Islands or something like that? Something like that, yes. North of Chagos. Okay, I don't know. I didn't see where he's going, so...

3:35 I just wonder, and I guess it comes from all the, uh, Gladio ops that we've read and gone through. It almost seems like they're turning him loose because they couldn't kill him in prison. And it's just not that I'm hoping for that. He's going to side pan. Sorry, Bridget. He's going to side pan. Yeah. But that's my fear, you know? Right. Mine too.

4:07 Actually, and just so as hard, just one thing you have to remember, this has nothing to do with the goodwill of the United States or the coming to Jesus moment for anybody. This is all to do with the election. Right. So now he can sit there up on the stage and say, well, Trump kept him in prison, which, of course, we know it was Pompeo and the CIA giving him bad information. That doesn't make it right, by the way.

4:36 He should have done the right thing and he didn't. But this has nothing to do with the coming to Jesus moment. This is all to stand up on stage tomorrow and say, well, we let Assange go and you didn't. You kept him in prison. And we're all for free. And we're all for free speech. Right. Forgetting the fact that the man is like essentially pleading guilty to a part of the kindling.

5:02 classified documents or whatever, like participating in it, not actual espionage, which they're never going to be able to get him on because he's not a citizen. But anyway, that's, that's my take on it, that it was not out of goodwill. And, and Bridget has a very valid point. Are we talking about Assange in here as I was going on? Yeah. Yeah. For right now. Yeah. So I did, I did want to add just,

5:33 Because SR-71 was correct in saying that it is a U.S. Commonwealth in the western Pacific that's north of Guam, and it's part of the northern Mariana Islands. Mariana. Thank you. I knew it began with an M. Thank you. Sure. So, Frog, did you have anything, Mike, that you wanted to add?

6:03 Yeah, I find it odd that Drop 1901 says June ETA talks about Seth Rich. Yeah, they can claim that they let him out for free speech, but it's been kind of well documented that his release has been pending and has all been signed for quite a while. I find the timing excellent. I think something amazing is going to happen from this. Deep Pasternak or whatever his name is, Pagenik.

6:30 was talking about that they gave him the documents that he released and that they were working with him. So, you know, it seems to be that a lot of this stuff is flooding out in opportune times. I think it's going to be a hot summer. I think it's going to be a really hot summer and we're going to see a lot of stuff happen. So God bless Julian Assange's family for being let free. Joe Biden, who is a part of the Obama team.

6:58 a part of Hillary's team, are the reason that he went away. So I just say to anyone, if they try to say that Joe Biden freed that guy, he did not free that guy. He had nothing to do with freeing the guy that he jailed. So it should be very interesting. I'm really excited, to be honest with you. I was so fired up last night. And then Cag Drogo dropped the video of Steve Pigenic talking about that, about them giving him the information on Seth Rich and the other stuff. That was fire.

7:27 Froggy, can you do me a favor? You said there's a video? I will grab that for you. Thank you, darling. I appreciate it. No problem at all, cousin. I got you. Go ahead, Mike. I was just going to share my opinions. I haven't watched the Julian Assange situation closely, so I'm going to guess that you guys, and especially Trump Frog, are going to know a lot more about it than I do.

7:54 There's two points I'm most concerned with. I'm concerned with part of that plea deal. I'm wondering how much information he'll actually be capable of sharing and discussing. And then the other thing that I'm concerned with is he was under a lot of attention and a lot of guard in a way of almost like you could view it as like.

8:16 protective custody in a way with how closely he was being watched and locked down. So I'm wondering if being out in the open air isn't also a greater threat and a greater opportunity to get any illicit objectives carried out now that he's out in the open air and mobile, which just increases the likelihood for having opportunities to have any sort of nefarious activity carried out against him. Those are all valid points, especially for those of us who are jaded with Operation Gladio and understand what they're capable of doing.

8:48 To me, if that was the plan, as we have seen with Jeffrey Epstein and everybody else, I think if they were able to get to him, that would have already been done. They're not hesitant in doing it. So from that perspective, I do agree with Frog that that scenario seems less likely to me because

9:18 there does seem to be some other things going on and I'll just leave it at that. So I don't know if you guys have ever had the opportunity to read on my sub stack, an article that I wrote about this and it probably only because it involves Spain of all places, since we just did Spain. I think what I will do is talk about that at the beginning of the show, because I do want to.

9:47 highlight a couple of points that is made in that article. SR71, go ahead and say what you want to say, and then we're going to dive into that. Well, the other thing that's got me concerned is he is going back to Australia, and we already know how Australia has played in a lot of these games. Do you get dropped, it looks like? No, I can hear him. Okay, I'll reset and go back. All right.

10:15 I'm concerned as to what's going to happen once he gets to Australia, what they're actually going to do with him. Other than that, all I can tell him is good luck. Yeah, right. Frog, what you got? I was just going to say, I think he's protected. I truly do. I could be 100% wrong. But look at Edward Snowden. You don't think that they can go get him too?

10:43 You don't think they could roll in anywhere and go get anyone they wanted at any time. We've been listening to this series for a long time. And believe me, we've all been waiting for Snowden to come out. I think the movie is just starting to get to the full-on action sequence that things are going to come out because they can't stop him from talking. Once he pleads and he gets his deal done, what's he going to plead that he's not going to share information that's already public record? Good points. Yeah, exactly. Very good point.

11:15 We talk about this a lot amongst ourselves, that Trump must have done a lot more. You know, we thought he had a very ineffective first term, but he must have done enough damage to the deep state slash international syndicate because the whole fact that he's walking around and not six foot under. Well, let me rephrase that for you, Bridget. We didn't think he had an ineffective.

11:44 First term. There's a lot of people out there that believe that. Right. Right. Yeah. Yeah. Because we understood exactly what was going on during his first term. It just wasn't visible to everybody else. And I think that's Frog's point that what was done is allowing what is going on right now to play out. But do you think he knew about Pompeo?

12:15 I mean, it was always trust Kansas, right, which to me was like the abject crap. I agree. I mean, the guy killed McAfee. So actors in a movie, what's the safest way to protect Julian Assange, have him be in jail? I mean, I'm not saying I like Pompeo, but actors in a movie, the only way you're going to keep that guy safe at that point was keep him in jail because, you know, obviously you got Broomhilda from Arkansas.

12:44 running around you know capping people mrs 187 um so i don't know i i trust pompeo no but maybe he's an actor in a movie i think we're going to find out a lot of people are playing parts okay so let's that's the perfect segue into this article so let's hit this article and then we'll open it back up um so just for background sheldon adelson owns

13:15 owns Las Vegas Sands, which is now the Venetian. And from our research in Operation Gladio, we've learned that the intel agencies work hand in hand with the criminal elements, including those of the mob and mafia.

13:29 You will find ties between these networks in the casino world, which obviously was apparent in Cuba and everywhere else. Adelson owned properties in Macau, which is dirty as hell, and Singapore, which is a drug hub, which has been meeting and planning destinations and money laundering for decades. He is a media mogul in Israel, and he has alleged ties to Mossad.

13:58 Jewish American. He has a similar rags to riches story as many of the people that we featured in all of our Gladio stories. So amazing that it seems completely unrealistic. An investigation into the $2.4 billion Macau casino led to a $9 million settlement with the SEC due to bribes being paid to mafia elements in Macau.

14:23 He was sued and was ordered to pay restitution for nonpayment of other parties in the Macau deal. He spent $8 billion on a complex in Singapore. He bought a local paper in Las Vegas and was accused of withholding all the negative news about himself. Adelson pressured White House Majority Leader Tom DeLay to withdraw a resolution that would have prevented the Chinese from hosting the 2008 Olympics.

14:51 The proposal never made it to the floor for a vote. It was alleged that Adelson's establishments were used for blackmail purposes in concert with the CIA and Mossad, blah, blah, blah. Assange was spied on for years by a Spanish security company called UC Global. David Morales is a former Spanish Special Forces member and had ties to the Spanish Gladio Network.

15:19 His background was in mercenary or assassin work, much like fellow Spaniard Yves-Garrion Sarat of Portugal's Agenda Press, which of course we've covered. Morales had won a contract to guard the Ecuadorian president's children and the Ecuadorian embassy in London. Weird two combinations there.

15:44 It was Morales' company that guarded Assange while he was in the embassy. Morales traveled to Las Vegas in 2016, bragging about his company guarding Assange. As the story goes, soon after returning to Spain, he was contacted by the CIA and was assured that he would receive many future contracts. One of the promised contracts was to guard Sheldon Adelson's yacht, Queen...

16:13 Marie, M-I-R-E. What's interesting is Morales was not hired to guard Adelson. Adelson had a longstanding security and lots of it. Was this quote-unquote contract for his yacht a cover for the CIA paying Morales for other work, which is what they do a lot. Remember the building of the bases in Spain? They padded all of that to pay Otto Skorzeny. So this is a known tactic that they use.

16:42 Morales' staff eventually contacted Assange's legal team and informed them of their spying on Assange. This information was passed on to the Spanish authorities, and Morales was arrested for spying on Assange at the behest of the CIA. He was also charged with money laundering and bribery. Morales was accused of spying on Ecuadorian diplomats as well as Assange visitors, such as our congresspeople.

17:12 what's her name, from Hawaii, because she went over there to visit him. Gabbert? Gabbert, thank you. Journalist, legal team, U.S. friends, etc. According to Grayzone, weeks after Morales proposed breaking into the office of Assange's lead counsel, the office was burglarized.

17:37 The witnesses also detailed a proposal of kidnapping and poisoning Assaj, which of course is something they've done repeatedly as part of Gladio. A police raid at the home of Morales netted two handguns with their serial numbers filed off, along with stacks of cash. Also, quote, Ecuadorian officials was robbed at gunpoint while carrying private information pertaining to a plan to secure diplomatic immunity for Assaj, unquote.

18:07 Another quote, U.S. intelligence appears to have worked through Adelson's Las Vegas Sands, a company that had previously served as an alleged front for CIA blackmail operations several years earlier, unquote. That was according to Consortium News. Also, Consortium added.

18:27 Quote, according to court documents and testimony by a former business associate employee of Morales, it was Adelson's top bodyguard, an Israeli-American named Zohar Lahab, it's Z-O-H-A-R, and his last name is L-A-H-A-B, who personally recruited Morales, then managed the relationship between the Spanish security contractor and the Sands Hotel.

18:56 After their first meeting in Vegas, the two security professionals became close friends, visiting each other overseas and speaking frequently. He appears to have Mossad ties. His presence in the 90s in Miami, this is talking about Adelson's chief of security. His presence in the 90s in Miami is interesting given all of the CIA ops that were ran out of Miami. And keep in mind that Operation Condor,

19:26 had all of those weapons going into Operation Condor countries from Israel. In 2020, Spain requested approval to question Zohar Lahav about his role in the Morales CIA spy ring. But thus far, the DOJ has blocked all efforts. So let's put this into context.

19:51 Adelson has an Israeli spy bodyguard working for him in Las Vegas and has been accused of using the hotel complex for blackmail. Lahav sets up a spying operation on Assange, allegedly for the CIA, with Morales. The DOJ protects Lahav from questioning when Spain requests access to Lahav. Yet the U.S. is demanding the ability to question Assange.

20:18 They want to question Assange, not for the spying, but for being a journalist and printing correct information about the CIA, which is perfectly legal. Assange has spent, at the time when I wrote this, seven years in jail for doing his job while the U.S. hires assassins to spy on him in foreign governments' embassies and allegedly trying to murder him. The icing on the cake was Najel.

20:44 was the top cybercrime investigator for the U.S. Secret Service. Yes, a Mossad-linked asset was the top cybercrime investigator inside the Secret Service. He was given a medal of commendation from the CIA for his time in this position. He was hired by the CIA to run Black Ops in Las Vegas. Or was he? Was he Mossad? Or both?

21:10 Witnesses in the Spanish case said that the operation Morales was involved in went from spying to theft to fraud to assassination plots. Lahav and Morales were identified in a South American country together, which was later identified as Brazil. Grayzone had reported American cooperation with the Spanish judges' request for a U.S.-based witness is...

21:37 mandated under a 2004 mutual legal instrument, which the DOJ completely ignored. Another very interesting aspect to the entire situation has to do with Chile. Those of us who are Operation Gladio students know that Pinochet was installed as an Operation Gladio Condor coup in Chile by the CIA. He was eventually arrested.

22:02 in 1998, and the presiding authority was Madrid. That same court is involved in the Morales arrest. The secret investigation was called Operation Tabanco. It revealed the CIA and UC Global connections. This court discovered that the kidnapping and assassination plot via poisoning of Assange, they're the ones that discovered it.

22:32 Witnesses say that Americans were desperate to get rid of Assange. Grayzone also reported it was the second time Adelson's company had been identified as a CIA asset. The first was in 2010 when a private intelligence report sponsored by the gambling industry alleged that Adelson owned casino in Macau was capturing footage of Chinese officials blowing huge sums of money.

23:00 and feeding it back to U.S. intelligence so that they could blackmail them into being CIA informants. Here's a quote. Throughout this period, Adelson's Las Vegas Sands employed Brian Nagel, N-A-G-E-L, as its director of global security. Nagel earned his stripes through nearly two decades at the U.S. Secret Service, helping the agency set up an array of anti-cyber partnerships with the FBI,

23:30 Los Angeles Police Department, and Department of Homeland Security to take down cyber thieves. Najal reportedly employed wiretaps, undercover informants, and overall an initiative to turn the tables on the criminal groups by empowering law enforcement to use the same technologies hackers and cyber criminals typically employ. His efforts ultimately earned him

23:59 metal, basically, who have made significant contributions to the agency intel efforts. Najal was mentioned in the Global Intelligence Files published by WikiLeaks, which consists of thousands of internal communications by employees of Stratfor, the U.S.-based intelligence firm referred to as Shadow CIA.

24:23 In a October 2009 email, Stratfor analysis detailed Najal's offer for a contract for Stratfor to conduct proactive monitoring, spying, on security threats against the Las Vegas Sands Hotel around the world. In December 2017, UC Global's David Morales made one of several trips to Adelson's Venetian Hotels in Las Vegas. From there, he sent instructions to employees.

24:52 on setting up a secret surveillance channel for the Ecuadorian embassy in London that could be fed back to another party without Ecuador's security even knowing about it. David Morales obviously didn't have the technical knowledge a former UC global IT specialist revealed, so the document must have been sent by another person because it was in English. I suspect it could have been created by U.S. intelligence.

25:19 The Spanish-speaking Morales told his employees at the time, these people have given me the following instructions drafted in English. Which employee of Las Vegas Sands had the technical expertise in electronic surveillance to conceive these instructions? And who boasted years of coordination with U.S. intelligence and law enforcement developing the very tools that they were suggesting be deployed against WikiLeaks when it first came online?

25:47 That all points to Nigel. Morales continued to work with Le Havre after Assange left the embassy. They were in Brazil in 2018. Adelson had been working on changing Brazil's laws, which forbid casino gambling. Bolsonaro didn't seem interested in working with Adelson. A few months later, Bolsonaro visits the U.S. and before seeing President Trump, he makes a visit to the CIA headquarters.

26:17 Afterwards, Flavio, Bolsonaro's son, was recently indicted by the Brazilian police for embezzlement, money laundering, and operating a criminal organization. Was he accused because of Gladio extortion? And if you thought it couldn't get any stickier, Zohar Lahav's status as director of executive protection for Adelson

26:44 Perhaps the largest individual donor to the president, and that's President Trump, is not the only connection to Trump. The Israeli-American is married to a motivational speaker by the name of Loren Slocum Lahab, who has worked closely with Tony Robinson facilitating 160 workshops for the wealthy self-help guru over the past 14 years.

27:13 Robbins happens to have been a business partner of Trump during his brief and abortive campaign for president in 2000. During Robbins' results 2000 speaking tour, he reportedly paid Trump a million dollars to deliver 10 speeches at seminars. Candidate Trump's exploratory committee described the appearances as campaign events. Trump is making money.

27:40 running for president, an advisor reported. Coverage of Trump's ethically questionable business relationship with Robbins surfaced during his 2017 when WikiLeaks published an email by the DNC employee disseminating opposition research. When Trump entered the Oval Office, the UC Global spying campaign against Julian Assange began.

28:04 It was initiated under an apparent watch of Mike Pompeo, who labeled WikiLeaks a hostile non-state intelligence agency. The operation appears to have been managed by Le Havre from its inception. Adelson was Trump's biggest donor in 2016 and in 2020. The end. So that's a lot of information. What I found most interesting.

28:32 about this, obviously, is the connection to the Spanish company and the fact that that guy's training when he was much younger was associated in Spain with a known Gladio unit that actually did Gladio missions. So whether or not he's still...

29:00 associated with that. I just found it all very interesting. Oh, look, Israel. This is my shocked face. Go ahead, SR71. I think Mike had his hand up first. I'm sorry, SR. Don't worry. Go ahead, Mike. Nope, nope. I didn't. It must be bugging out a little bit. I don't have my hand up. Yeah, I don't see his hand up at all. Okay, SR71, go.

29:33 Yeah, if I heard you correctly, you said Bolsonaro visited Trump and then the CIA. Bolsonaro did what? Visited Trump. No, he went to the CIA first. He went to the CIA first. Okay. Had it been the other way around, I would have been questioning whether or not Trump sent Bolsonaro to the CIA with a message.

30:00 Yeah, no, I think Trump delivers his own messages to the CIA. But it is very interesting that these people were down trying to obviously bully Bolsonaro into changing Brazil law to introduce casinos. And Bolsonaro had a message to deliver to the CIA directly. And then he went and saw Trump. I also posted a couple of links.

30:32 that were related to what you were talking about up in the nest. Okay. So I'm going to, Bridget, I'm going to give you, I'm going to text you this link for you to put in there so they can go read it because the article itself has lots of hyperlinks in it. So y'all can go to the source documents and check them all out yourself if you want to. Sounds great. Yeah. So anyway.

31:02 Does anybody else have any questions about any of that information? Nope. All right. So we're going to head in to our next segment, which happens to be the England tube bombing. And for those of you who don't know, who have never been to London, they call.

31:32 Their subway, the tube, T-U-B-E, the tube. So let's see. Okay. So in 2005, July 7th, and we have to kind of do a little bit of background. Over in Scotland, there was a hotel called Glen Eagles Hotel.

32:10 And Prime Minister Tony Blair was concluding a visit with some G8 attendees. And around, it's in the morning, and they're basically supposedly talking about the war on terror and, you know, a whole bunch of real important stuff.

32:38 By the afternoon, his agenda got completely swapped around, and there was a bunch of rhetoric spouted off about rooting out villains who attack our way of life. It may be a detail, but at this early stage, conclusive evidence of an extremist Islamic plot was far from established.

33:07 Again, he just kind of out of nowhere blurts out that what appears to be some threat, but he doesn't elaborate on anything about the threat. It's almost like kind of seeding the narrative. And what happens shortly after that is the trains, the tubes, blows up and 52 people.

33:37 and 784 are injured. Many who lived were permanently disabled as a result of the bomb blast. And it says there were three young men from Pakistan, Mohammed Khan, who was 30, Shahaz Tawir,

34:09 and Hasib Hussein, 18, together with a friend that had been born in Jamaica, Jermaine Maurice Lindsay, who had adopted an Islamic name, Abdullah Shahid Jamal, who was 19. They supposedly all met up on the Luton railway station.

34:39 about 30 miles outside of London. They boarded a 7.40 a.m. commuter train to King's Cross. And supposedly their plan was to do suicide bombings. And there is, as part of the overall scenario, there is a grainy shot.

35:09 of the four young men captured by a closed-circuit camera at the Luton Station at 7.21. So they get there about 20 minutes early. They bought four return tickets, having already purchased and paid for a place to park their car. Next, they boarded the 7.40 King's Cross train.

35:41 There they were told, or we're told, that there is another picture that was taken at 8.26. The problem with these accounts is quite simple. It cannot possibly be true because the Thames Railway Company was having a bad hair day that day, and the 740 never ran that day.

36:09 What followed was a bewildering trail of false statements and deceptions, which is clue number one, that you're dealing with an Operation Gladio event, and they're going to lie about everything. The four bombers were now switched to a 748 train, but the alibi collapsed there too. That train was held up by problems with the overhead electrical wires and did not get away from the station until 756.

36:37 It arrived at King's Cross a full 12 minutes after the crucial snapshots were taken. So whatever they took a picture of, it isn't them. And just eight minutes before the first explosion. The one remaining possibility was that the earlier scheduled 730, again, which was delayed, actually came through that station and they happened to have gotten on it.

37:08 But there's no record of that. It also takes your imagination to explain why young men with heavy backpacks sprinting through rush hour traffic and the crowds at the station would have been able to make even a delayed train, but also a connecting...

37:39 train later on with that short of a window in order to get into London. Yet almost a year later, in June 2006, John Reed, who was the Home Secretary, kind of like our HHS guy, solemnly informed the House of Commons an irritating minor civil service slip occurred while compiling the official narrative.

38:07 prepared by a civil servant to stem the public's appetite for a full inquiry. The bombers were now aboard the 730, the third attempt to transport them to the Capitol. Later versions of the timetable were doctored to fit into this new account that they came up with, which was actually like the third version of the account. But are these anything but...

38:42 Excuses. Would not any train have sufficed? Why the obsession with trying to synchronize explosions on three specific subway trains? What happened, or more accurately, did not happen at the Luton station early on 7 July 2005 is the key that unlocks the true story of the London bombings. Ironically, the most crucial nugget of evidence was supplied by Whitehall.

39:09 itself thanks to the dogged persistence of a 7-7 truther, Bridget Dunn, D-U-N-N-E. Mrs. Dunn had made herself a nuisance concerning the 740 ghost train that never ran, which had now found its way into the official narrative, which takes the place of the full open inquiry that Blair

39:38 contemptuously dismissed as a diversion because it would actually have revealed all of this much sooner. Bridget Doone demanded to know why on January 2007, the record concerning the 740 had still not been amended in the official account. The unofficial answer was a huge amount of bureaucratic wrangling. The official response eventually was this, quote,

40:04 It has now become clear that the exact timing of the train's departure, given at 7.40, was based on what was later found to be conflicting witness statements, unquote. It is curious how anyone on the station platform that morning might have witnessed a train that never existed. So where's the conflict? The reference to witnesses is yet another invention.

40:34 Building the case around four angry young men bent on blowing up tube networks demanded that the bombers be seen at Luton with sufficient time to board the ghost train. This would have been a good 20 minutes in hand as they ambled onto the station a little bit after 7.22. In an adjustment worthy of Orwell's Winston Smith,

41:02 the most famous rewrite artist in dystopian literature, Dune received this bland Freedom of Information reply from the Information Policy Unit. That doesn't sound like 1984 at all. Information Policy Unit at the home office concerning changes to the official account. So on page four, they changed the time from 7.15.

41:31 to 7.14, like a minute. Slipped innocuously into the public record with no explanation, the purpose was expressively political. The Secretary of State found himself pinned down, and not exclusively by the earlier blenders of the ghost train. He allowed just three minutes for the bombing party to get onto the platform.

41:59 buy tickets, and pass the barriers to get actually on the train. This lie is ridiculous. In fact, with a 7.30 running late, Camera 14's original digital timing could have been left as it was. The questions began to pile up immediately. Why are we apparently looking at wet pavement with puddles laying around on a warm, dry, sunny morning?

42:28 Because, you know, the more they lie, the more you start examining the evidence. And that's what these people don't understand. People now are not going to let them get away with this kind of shit. So for a rush hour snap, the entrance to this very commuter station seemed oddly deserted, but for the four figures, because normally at that time in the morning, it would be bustling.

42:57 Where was that picture actually taken? The strange halos around the images imply photoshopped paste-ups, taking individual images and then stitching them into frames where they want them to be. Magnified, there is a blurry appearance around each figure, so facial features are not properly recognizable. One figure, we are told is Khan, seems to be stepping through metal bars.

43:24 What might dispel the strong suspicion of forgery is a row of animated images showing the individuals physically interacting with each other or footage from other cameras distributed around the stations because there are many. In their absence, the assumption of surveillance shots taken independently and then merged is overwhelming. So basically, they're altered photos.

43:52 It has never been independently verified for authenticity, which, considering it represents the entire argument as a foundation for the fact that they were the guilty parties, you would have thought that they would have at least had the photos verified. Likewise, thousands of hours of the security camera tape the police claim to possess confirming the guilt of the bombers.

44:22 has never came to be released. It is under lock and key, which also tells you there's probably something fishy going on. Then a running visual account should have recorded all of their movements. All you have to do is release them. Each time some new security scare came out,

44:50 There was a cry for even more cameras. And so why are they not using the cameras that they forced down everybody's throats? Huge question, especially in London, because they got cameras on everything. The first explosion on the eastbound Circle Line occurred at 8.51, eight minutes after the train left King's Cross. The second, almost simultaneously, was on a westbound...

45:18 circle line eight minutes after leaving King's Cross. The third was a southbound Piccadilly line, again eight minutes later. Whichever way the train puzzle is presented, it would require the winged Mercury to have performed a miracle in the brief time available, flash through the access barriers, hurdle all of the walkway escalators,

45:44 tight, frantic morning commuters, and then find the train with doors open, jump on there with your bomb attached to your back in order for them to be the ones that blew up the train. There's no physical way any of that actually happened, yet the government was force-feeding this down everybody's throat. So, amid the shock felt by the stunned nation, a crisis management specialist called Peter

46:15 Power, can't make that name up, suddenly sprang up out of nowhere on nationwide BBC television and radio. He stated that his security services company, Visor, B-I-S-O-R, was paid to run a crisis drill the very day on behalf of a prominent company based in the city of London. Now, this is very, very important because one of the...

46:44 similarities is them running an exercise, which they hire people like those four guys to come and be part of the exercise, not knowing they're going to be accused of a crime. This has been repeated in several of our Gladio

47:05 revelations. So just like the Boston Marathon bombing, they had a simultaneous exercise. 9-11, NORAD was running a simultaneous exercise. This is another one of those hallmarks that we like to talk about. By extraordinary coincidence, the exercise involved precisely the same exact trains and the same exact locations and the same exact timings.

47:33 of the bombs, which actually occurred in real time. It seems the events had been flipped into a reality from a training scenario. In the course of a particular BBC live interview, Power tendered just one of those things as the, oh, quote, just one of those things, like tossing off the fact that it was a coincidence and no big deal.

48:05 He informed the interviewer, Peter Allen, quote, I still have the hair on the back of my neck standing upright, unquote. Shortly afterwards, he flew off to Canada for a disaster management exercise and told the viewers on the Canadian broadcasting system concerning the London bombs, quote, it's a coincidence and it's a spooky coincidence.

48:34 Our scenario was very similar. It wasn't totally identical, but it was based on bombs going off to the time, the locations, all that sort of stuff, unquote. And as Frog knows, there are no such things as coincidences. And then the book quotes or mentions, let's see, let's see.

49:09 Almost exactly a year earlier, he was one of a select panel of experts selected to assist BBC in preparing an Orwellian fictional preview of the 7-7 attacks. This was a broadcast that was on Panorama, current affairs program, as, quote, London's under attack, unquote.

49:35 It might have been a documentary enticed from a parallel universe because it featured the same script of bombed underground trains and political denunciations of Al-Qaeda. A chlorine tanker stood in for the red double-decker bus, which also was attacked as part of this whole thing. We've only talked about the Tube 3 trains, but there was also, outside of the Tube station downtown,

50:05 a double-decker bus. But in the scenario that was broadcast a year before, it was a tanker truck full of chlorine. The BBC's publicity department contributed this advanced promotion of the events. Quote, this fictional day of terror unfolds through the immediacy of rolling news, bringing the catastrophic attacks into our living rooms. Unquote.

50:34 George Orwell, who was paid to broadcast wartime propaganda on the BBC, would instantly recognize the dangerous transition from news reporting to social manipulation. It was all as if we were living in 1984. So what have we all learned? There are something.

50:57 magnetically enticing about all of these particular trains, which made the invisible hand behind 7-7 guide those young men towards them. Now we have some explanations for the fantastic scrambling of the timetable, inventing witnesses, and meddling with the closed circuit video. As for the television interview, professional information managers recognize this as the time-honored

51:27 technique of teasing out awkward information when public attention is focused on the high drama event itself. The coincidence has been largely buried by the corporate media and ignored by authorities. It is not mentioned anywhere in the whitewashing called the official narrative, but it is buried in other news so that they can tell you they told you, but they told you when you weren't paying attention.

51:57 Only three years later did Peter Power finally state that the business and security service company Reed Elsevier, E-L-S-E-V-I-E-R, was behind the commission. It can be safely stated that Power was well placed to talk about Infernos on the London Underground Network.

52:28 On the evening of November 1984, he was the star turn as Pied Piper who escorted passengers to safety when a train was involved in a fire near Oxford Circus Station. So, in other words, he seems to be one of their stand-in performers when they pull off these kinds of events.

52:50 The ambitious off-duty Scotland Yard inspector took control of the train after barging into a driver's compartment and seizing the controls. When the driver protested at this rude invasion of the London Transportation property, power responded by smartly knocking him out. Almost exactly three years later, he was the Met duty officer at a devastating fire which broke out at King's Cross Station, killing 31 people.

53:19 Another of those strange coincidences that seemed to follow Mr. Power around, a certain Ian Blair, his future superior at the London police, was also on duty during the deadly blaze. The designs were entertaining a catastrophe scenario on the London transportation system, and it seems like all of these other catastrophes seemed, Power seemed to be the consistent guy.

53:49 That was part of all of them. So, getting to that fourth bomb. On Route 30, a double-decker bus that was located in Russell Square, close to one of the stations, killed 13 passengers when it went off. And it also had its own mysteries.

54:16 detonated at 9.47, roughly an hour after the train bombs in the tubes. Hasib Hussein, the tall 18-year-old touted as the youngest member of this deadly cell, was the subject of this one. The spotter camera, which snapped him at 9 o'clock, walking slowly out of a Boots drugstore on Eaton Station.

54:45 Despite his imminent summons to death, he stopped to purchase batteries, supposedly to explode his bomb. Are we really to believe that he didn't bring batteries for his bomb with him? According to the official narrative, he was supposed to be dead by this hour. When he hung around for a hamburger before...

55:10 going on to get on the bus at 9 35 because you know that's what you're going to do you're going to eat before you go blow yourself up supposedly on a whim because the northern line his intended target um at least that's what they told us was shut down exactly how did he reveal his intentions that that was going to be his original target when he's now dead

55:40 Like everything else connected to the London bombings, much of the script that was told to the people were just flat out ludicrous if you thought about it for two seconds. But the whole idea of these terror events is to get you emotionally charged up so they can lie to you with any lie. And because you're emotional at the time, you're not going to be thinking critically. And that's kind of the thing that we have to...

56:09 train ourselves not to fall into. So a couple of points about this one. Number 30, which is this bus, would normally make a loop around the square. Why was this particular number 30 not steered away from the station instead of sending it on the detour? Why was it the only bus on Route 30 diverted that morning?

56:43 to put it exactly where it exploded. So in other words, there's actually a detour going on and no other bus went where this bus went. There was a special reason why this bus was allowed to go against the detour. Why was it the only bus serving that particular route to undergo 20 hours of special closed caption TV maintenance in the previous days?

57:12 How did the quote unquote maintenance come to be performed by a technician the garage managers did not recognize? In other words, it was somebody that didn't work there. Yet he was admitted despite all of the rules that say contrary to quote unquote do work on the closed circuit TV. Now.

57:45 Let me introduce this other guy, and I have no idea how to say his last name. His first name's Daniel Adigwe. He was riding on the lower deck of the number 30 bus, was now to claim an experience that day that changed his life. He narrowly escaped death, only to find himself ignored as a key witness and then plunged into a cat and mouse pursuit.

58:14 by the police and intelligence services. He received the full no truth or left behind treatment. His account would seem to supply graphic evidence pointing to all of the events on January 7th as a massive false flag exercise in synthetic terrorism. Daniel found himself alive in a dreamlike landscape where fact and fiction crossed seamless boundaries. He was never supplied

58:42 credible evidence that he was actually, he was never supplied credible evidence that he was actually a passenger on the bus, though there seems to be no doubt that he was an eyewitness to the events of the explosion. Attaway's account states that just another routine commute to work was abruptly turned into a horror story when number 30 switched streets.

59:13 Riding on the lower deck, Daniel stated that he had a good view for a brief moment of two sedans, a BMW and a Mercedes, pulled in front of the bus. A police motorcyclist drew alongside and was shown some kind of a pass. The bus driver was motioned to follow the cars. Moments later, Bus 30 was destroyed.

59:42 near the offices of the British Medical Association. Finding himself stunned but unhurt, Daniel surveyed the chaos of wreckage, bodies of the dead, dying, and injured. He observed in close succession two figures who remained forever embedded in his memory. So, the scene that he describes is accurate, said many...

1:00:16 nearby witnesses. The first he refers to as camcorder man was dressed all in black and recording the casualties and wreckage as though he was a visitor from somewhere else. Next was a guy he referred to as white bandage whose image was to flash around the world as a symbol of atrocities. The problem

1:00:45 white bandage was at least 50 yards in front of the bus, whereas it was obvious the full force of the explosion had blasted away the rear part of the vehicle. So, in other words, he's all bandaged up like he was part of the explosion when, in fact, he wasn't anywhere near the bus when it exploded.

1:01:12 This guy also notes that there was no bloodstains on any of his bandages, and he basically just kind of shows up like he's a crisis actor. Which again, because all of this stuff was part of a training exercise, it's perfectly logical that you would have somebody dressed up in bandages as part of this scene. Daniel Ottowee.

1:01:41 had the distinct impression of being part of a film. Peter Power did not mention Russell Square as part of the Visor's crisis drill. There is no evidence or proof of any kind that it was, but everything that Attawee recorded in minute detail, such as the foot soldiers standing around, the acting like spectators, the people dressed up with bandages, a camcorder guy filming everything.

1:02:11 all seemed like it was a dress rehearsal. They spoke of a sudden surge of power and a strange blue light. Oh, for the tunnels. So then he goes back to the tunnels and they try to come up with an explanation for how the tunnels blew up. And basically, as you read through, it appears because they run on like an electrical grid and the voltage.

1:02:39 When they got done, other people, not the government, because they're still lying out their ass. When everybody kind of put their heads together and was trying to figure out how they could have exploded and the timing of all of the tube cars, the only...

1:02:59 commonality that they all had, because it certainly weren't. And again, they have the same thing here that they had in Spain. The detonations were so large that there's nothing in a backpack that could have ever caused the damage that was caused to these trains. They believe that there was an electrical current that these trains run on that was redirected

1:03:28 or used to ignite C-4 explosives. Now, it could have been the electrical power alone if they could have gotten an appropriate short on each of those three lines, or it could have been connected to C-4 explosives. So basically, that's what they...

1:03:57 you know, kind of the engineers after the fact trying to put their heads together based on what little evidence that there was available. That's kind of what they end up coming away with. And there does seem to be some credence in the C4. And I'll just read a little excerpt. The issue with the explosives.

1:04:28 indicate that apparently the first teams that crawled over the wreckage, broken bodies, remnants of charred clothing, and enormously power explosive had been used. The French anti-terrorist chief, Christopher Chabot, who was urgently summoned to the scene from Paris, pointed the signs of a military type C4 explosive that was readily available from the Balkans.

1:04:56 That could have been used. And it says he made himself unpopular in London by pointing to Iraq as a possible source as well. So that's very interesting. And let's see, I was just trying to figure it out. Any other details?

1:05:28 that may have been important to the overall scenario. But they immediately basically started the same thing as far as trying to tell people one story and every story, you know, about the actual bombings themselves began falling apart.

1:06:00 So I did want to read this one last thing. One disturbing aspect of the bombings, which has received little coverage from the media, began to concern the behavior of the police and the other state performers in the immediate aftermath. Psychologists understand that part of the healing process is empathy that the physical remains of the deceased. Yet in the wake of the bombings, an extraordinary cover-up ensued that bereaved relatives

1:06:30 were not allowed to see their loved ones for up to two weeks. Some, like the family of 30-year-old Rome-born Benetta Sicassia, who died, were advised not to see her body, better to remember her before. Other stories, such as John Taylor, whose 24-year-old daughter Carrie had died, struggled with authorities for 10 days to even get confirmation she was killed.

1:07:00 A week after 7-7, the distraught mother of a Nigerian-born 26-year-old stood at Tavistock Square to exclaim her public agony that she feared he was on the number 30 bus, but still had no facts or information. He's missing and we fear he was in the bus explosion. We don't know. Relatives of Samantha Badham could not make a formal identification until July...

1:07:30 9 days after she gave her full name to the paramedics. She died shortly afterwards. Her parents say they never were invited to see her body or even know where she was. So she survived and actually told the paramedics who she was and then she later died and they would not let the parents know. Reverend Julie Nicholson, whose daughter Jenny died.

1:07:55 was given the extraordinary explanation by a police officer that delays in identification were occurring because hundreds of body parts had been dispatched for expert examination at a laboratory in Bosnia. Bosnia. You know, because London or England doesn't have any mortuary capability for body IDs, you have to ship body parts.

1:08:25 to Bosnia. What the hell? Of all of the stories, perhaps the Reverend Nicholson's is one of the most important in terms of clues. Jerry had clearly suffered terrible injuries as a consequence of the blast. Organic compounds such as hydrogen peroxide laced or propelled by pepper generated intense

1:08:54 thermal heat precisely because of the rapid oxidization of the pepper. So the bodies covered from the blast and the wounds of the injured would exhibit, if not exclusively, exposure to intense heat, especially burns. Perhaps the injuries and especially those of the victims were literally disintegrated.

1:09:17 were consistent with enormous upward pressure that basically lifted the subway cars up off of the tracks. That points to military type munitions because you can't do that with a back sack. So that's the reason why they didn't want anybody to see the bodies is because it would have been a dead giveaway.

1:09:45 to how these people were murdered. Under the laws of England, a full post-mortem when deaths occur in suspicious circumstances must take place if ordered by the responsible coroner. We are now caught in convolutions of procedure for reasons never properly explained. It was delayed for five years. So that tells you 100% basically.

1:10:17 All you need to know about whether or not those two bombings were an Operation Gladio event, because they 100% were. And it's amazing that our governments have been allowed to basically get away with this kind of garbage for way longer.

1:10:47 And I don't know what we collectively do to stop it. But I think, again, the first step is all of us recognizing that it's not just here. It's not just in London. It's not just in Spain. These people have been doing this all over the world. So let's open it up for questions, comments. There were a lot of different bombings. I know.

1:11:24 that Cousinette also found in, like, New York and so on, that also seem to have, and they also warned recently about the Olympic bombing, or warned to steer clear of subway stations around the Olympics. Well, they've obviously practiced blowing them up a few times, so that's probably good advice.

1:11:51 I'd also want to know what kind of exercises they ran and when they ran them, because that also seems to be a big hint of what they're going to be doing. Go ahead, Frogger. All right. Amazing. Amazing. So you open up this space talking about Sheldon Adelson. So is he really, really a bad guy? So you have to kind of, he's definitely in the international syndicate.

1:12:22 OK, he is 100 percent in the international syndicate. He has involved himself in the criminal underbelly of not just Las Vegas, but Macau, Singapore and around the world. He hires people that for his security.

1:12:49 And I read several articles about the one guy that runs his security team. He hung out with all of the Cuban exile groups in Miami that we've talked about repeatedly recently, which are known Operation Gladio people that went on Gladio missions through Latin America and in Europe.

1:13:14 That security guy actually hangs out with those same people. So do I have any direct evidence? No. Does he hang out in all of those same spaces? 100%. So, you know, just like, but I'll caveat that with this. We don't know. If you go back and look at Operation Grey Lord in Chicago, where for seven years they ran a sting.

1:13:49 An international sting of this magnitude would take 20 years in order to seed people where you need them to find out the tentacles of the octopus. Is it possible he's one of them? Absolutely, it's possible he's one of them. Is it possible he's not one of them? Absolutely. I'm very hesitant, and that's why I use the faceless international syndicate.

1:14:18 I recognize how you do counterinsurgencies. I mean, I got training on how you do that. You do that by pretending to be the bad guy. So there's not one of us. As a matter of fact, let me also say this. When we do counterinsurgencies in the military, in a joint operation, you will have, and I'm just going to make this up.

1:14:48 So don't quote me on it. You will have like three different SEAL teams doing counterinsurgencies. And those SEAL teams are dressed up like the locals. And keep in mind, most SEAL teams that are in the Pacific Fleet don't interoperable, interoperate with the necessarily on an often.

1:15:18 basis with a frequent basis with the SEAL teams that are like, say, the Atlantic. They kind of get area specific and they concentrate in those areas for language purposes and stuff like that. So it is completely possible that you can have three separate SEAL teams in a single country doing.

1:15:43 three different missions of infiltration, and they not know the other team is there, okay? One team could be in one city. One team can be in another. They're going to embed themselves. They're going to dress up like the locals. They're going to have a story that they came from such and such a village. They've got the ID on them that says all of this. They got fake paperwork. That's how you do counterinsurgencies. When you do that,

1:16:12 You don't know who the good guys are and who the bad guys are. The whole purpose of being there is to figure that network out, take that intel back, chart a map so that when you do go in to take the bad guys out, provided they're not just calling them communists and making shit up, you can actually take the bad guys out. So if you extrapolate that to a worldwide octopus,

1:16:38 There is going to be people who 20 years ago were part of this mission to basically take this international syndicate down. When they got brought into the mission and what segment of that mission they're in, their next door neighbor, their wife may not know that they're in it. Because the...

1:17:07 The covert nature of this mission doesn't allow you to say that because that puts the person that you give that information to at risk as well. So I just wanted to say that. So people understand. No one, and that's why these people that go, oh, so-and-so was caught and they were killed two years ago and all that other bullshit. That's all bullshit. Don't believe that. Don't pass that on.

1:17:35 Don't pass anything on from real raw news. That's all bullshit. There's not a single person. And that's the same way with these people that criticize General Flynn. These people don't know. They're making shit up. And most of these people, if they've spent any time in the military, they spent a couple of years in the military. Not even enough.

1:18:01 to have successfully completed a tech school and are out acting like they're experts on how counterinsurgencies work. I'm not an expert and I spent 30 years in it. I was never in a counterinsurgency. I learned how to plan them. I was never an active participant in it. So I'm not going to pretend like I know. We can look at hallmarks. We can look at patterns.

1:18:28 which is why I think what we're doing here is so important. But that's an excellent question. Sunshine, did you have a question? I did, but you kind of answered it. Yes. Well, just share your thoughts with us. What do you think about what we've talked about? Well, I'm kind of concerning now more on what is...

1:19:04 What's going to happen over there at the Olympics? They're targeting Russia to blame everything on Russia because they are the target now under threat. I'm just wondering, obviously, we can make predictions. We already know the CIA is already warning about subways and the infrastructure in there. Just thoughts on what they're going to actually try to pull over there.

1:19:34 What we can look out as historics, we do know that they target events like that. You hate to say this, but in today's day and age, if I had a child that was an Olympic athlete, I would be hard pressed to allow them to go given the desperateness of the situation that we're in. Because I want everybody to understand the farther you push.

1:20:03 these people into a corner. And that's exactly what's happening. The closer we get to the election, the closer, the more pressure is exerted on them into a, further into the corner. They have no way out if President Trump gets reelected. This is really it for them. I have noticed the complete change in their funding.

1:20:32 apparatus. In the past, they seemingly had billions, hundreds of billions, if not trillions of dollars at their disposal to orchestrate some of the most outlandish, crazy shit, killing hundreds of thousands, if not millions of people all over the world. They have lost that funding apparatus, and I don't know how, but they have.

1:20:58 And the desperateness of the CIA speaking out for probably the first time I've ever seen on insisting that funding money went through to Ukraine was something that I have never seen. And I was involved for six years in the budget process in Washington, D.C. I have never seen the CIA beg for money. They were begging for money. And that's unheard of.

1:21:26 So there has been something that's happened behind the scenes. And you can tell it with basically the approach to solving their problem. Their problem is Donald Trump and the accountability that he represents. So in the past, you would have had happen what happened to JFK. They've done that repeatedly and they can't do it this time.

1:21:56 So that should give us all confidence in that that part of security has been excellent. And the fact that they can't do that has resulted in these dumbass lawsuits. I mean, on the surface, it's like you're looking at the aftermath of some of these.

1:22:25 Train's blowing up. The narrative that they are forced to come out with is nonsensical. It makes no sense at all. Anybody that knows, and I'll just give you an example. Today, Julie Kelly came out and this whole thing about Kyle Serapin, I don't know what that guy's problem is, but Julie made the point that the FBI had altered evidence by putting those cover sheets.

1:22:55 On the documents that they had thrown out on the floor and had taken pictures and then was using that as part of the classified documents case. Well, let me explain to you how this works. When you carry pieces of paper around that are classified, they have a classification cover sheet on them. And that classification cover sheet on them says.

1:23:20 that they're either classified as secret, top secret, top secret SGI with code letters, whatever. It has the classification. So if you leave the document laying on your desk, no one can actually see the document. You just see the cover sheet. The only people, obviously, that are allowed to look at the document, you have to be cleared based on the cover sheet level to be able to read the inside of it. So when you declassify something,

1:23:49 Not only do you take that cover sheet off, there's pending changes that you make to all of the paragraphs because on a classified document, not only do they classify the entire document at the highest level, each paragraph has to have a classification on it. So if everything in that paragraph is unclassified, it'll say that out in the margin with a letter.

1:24:15 If the next paragraph is classified as secret, it will have an S. If the next paragraph is classified as top secret, it'll have a TS code out in the margin. And then you put a cover sheet on it because the highest paragraph is top secret. You put a top secret cover sheet on it. Not the entire document is top secret because it contains at least a paragraph or a sentence of top secret.

1:24:44 That's the highest level. So that's the cover sheet that has to go on it. So when Trump declassified all of that information and put it in his suitcase or whatever and carried it to Mar-a-Lago, there was no cover sheets that accompanied it. None. Because none of it was classified. What the FBI did was altered evidence. They took those unclassified documents, which would have had initials.

1:25:13 Because again, those codes, the S and the TS, when you declassify it, you take a pen and you mark that out and you initial it so that now everything on the document is declassified. You can still see, go to the CIA files. You can see where the formerly classified that has now been, you can see the pen and ink changes that are made to them. It's very obvious what I'm talking about.

1:25:39 And because they're now not classified, they don't have cover sheets on them. So they just put them out on the web. What they did was two things by laying them on the floor like they did and slapping them cover sheets on them. They made it look like they were still classified, even though they say they were just like, I guess Kyle's point was that slapping them on was like covering up shit that you shouldn't see.

1:26:06 Well, it was declassified. There's no shit I can't see. But what most people don't know, so number one, they put the cover sheets on them to make it look like it was still classified, even though it was not. Number two, by putting those cover sheets on them, they hid the pen and ink changes that would have indicated that the entire document was declassified. That's the most important part of it.

1:26:37 So, if we would have been able to see those documents laying on the floor, it would have been relevant and obvious that they had been declassified. That's, to me, the real reason why they put those cover sheets over them. And anybody that has dealt with classified documents understands what I just said, and it's significant. The only reason...

1:27:06 There wouldn't have been any documents without those cover sheets. And if we're supposed to believe our former president was such a criminal that he threw off all of those cover sheets and still had classified information, then there's no way that they would have had all the appropriate classified cover sheets.

1:27:31 In order to be able to, they just threw them things on there to pretend like they were all still classified. So Julie was absolutely right in calling that out as altering evidence because it's ridiculous. So it was all to make us all think there was more to it than there really was. Correct. Correct. There was all four objects.

1:28:00 Yes, there was zero to that lawsuit, just like there was zero to the Atlantic Atlanta lawsuit. There was zero to the New York. They have. So that shows you. And to me, as horrible as all of this is, it should actually make us feel really good that that's the level of ridiculousness that they have to go to because they can't touch a hair on his head and they ain't got shit on him. Well, how do you think they feel about?

1:28:29 You know, I mean, the CIA, I mean, about Trump saying he's going to release all of the JFK files before he's elected. That would imply that he has them. OK. And I'm I'm kind of I don't know. I think this is a weird one. Yeah. But I can tell you that.

1:28:56 What it's going to show and the reason why they... I don't know that anybody has, other than blackmail, has any hesitation to out the CIA. What no one was willing to do is out NATO. And the JFK assassination has everything to do with NATO. Because once we understand that...

1:29:22 NATO is the one that created Operation Gladio. NATO is the one that coordinated all the training. NATO is the one that deployed the OAS that had been trained by Otto Skorzeny into Dallas that day. And that's why they make it sound, if you go back and you listen to reasoning of why they wouldn't do it, it has an international implication.

1:29:49 And every single thing that I have read all points to NATO with the verification that those two OAS assassins, I mean, that's what they were trained to do is take out people. And they have a whole list of dead bodies that they left in their wake. And it was the CIA and a Dallas police officer who escorted them out of Dallas after the assassination.

1:30:20 So there's so much to that, but it's going to go back to NATO. And then once you realize NATO has been a terrorist organization, it has to be dissolved. So I think that's the bottom line, the reluctance of anybody, because they all live off of NATO. That's a power apparatus for them.

1:30:46 And they know that by taking on NATO, they will be taking on the international syndicate, which created NATO. So that's who pays their paycheck, not us. You know, Nancy Pelosi's $100,000 she spends in wine in a month, as far as her salary goes that we pay. She is paid by the international syndicate to do exactly what they want her to do. She's not paid by us. That's kind of a...

1:31:16 That's something everybody needs to just let go of because it is absolutely not true. And I think that was part of Trump saying everybody needs to. He obviously knows we need to get out, but he couldn't do it his first term. But I think that was part of him saying everybody needs to pay their share. We're not paying the world's bills anymore to NATO. Correct. I mean, he obviously wants to pull out, but he couldn't do that the first term. Yeah, I don't disagree.

1:31:49 I understand the whole political aspect of it, but I, from my perspective, already knowing the answers, I just want shit done. Right. I agree with you. I know the whole, you know, everybody has to be ready. There has to be. Yeah, I got all of that. Bridget, go ahead. That was one of the things that I actually thought long and hard about. Had he been his first presidency, his first year.

1:32:25 He was very much an unknown. He was surrounded by a lot of backstabbing people, like we had talked about before. And if he had done, like he did pull us out of quite a few different things. And some of those, I do think, affected the money aspect of what they had going on. You cut off, Bridget. Oh, sorry. Anyway, they had.

1:32:54 quite a bit going on. I think had he pulled out of something that big at the time without proving himself and proving what, how the corruption, how deep and how widespread the corruption was, they would have seen it, the public at large would have seen it as him becoming a radical. Yeah, I don't disagree. And the beauty, again, people don't know history.

1:33:26 When you go back and you look at history, you realize we would not have been the first to pull out of NATO. France did it. Charles de Gaulle did it because this same NATO organization was trying to kill him when it was in his own country. They tried to kill him over 20 times. So he pulled France out and France didn't come back into NATO until like 2009.

1:33:54 Most people don't even know that. But again, he had bombs exploding. His car was being blown up. His car was being shot at. And so, yeah, there was at least some visible evidence that they were trying to assassinate him, which is what he used as justification for kicking NATO out of Paris. And that's when it moved to Belgium. So go ahead, Steller.

1:34:24 Good morning. Thank you for having this space. Yeah, like what Sunshine was saying, I think is the same thing, too. I can't hear her. Is she talking? I can hear her. All right. I can hear her. Hold on. I can hear her, too. Gotta love spaces. Welcome to Colonel Tanner Spaces, where you talk about this topic everyone gets dropped seven or eight times, so you gotta be stubborn and stick with it.

1:35:03 Make sure while she's resetting that you guys followed Colonel Bridget and Cousin It. And everyone up on the panel, Stiller, Trumpfrog, amazing people, SR77, whoever you like talking, follow them. Turn on notifications so you don't miss anything because this information is mind-blowing and life-changing information. Thank you. And definitely follow Sally. That girl gives bombs, too. She's awesome. Absolutely. And she's bringing the heat, too.

1:35:34 Big time. Can you hear me, Colonel Tanner? No, I can. I can. Yeah, go ahead. OK, so like with a lot of the things that have been going on and stuff and, you know, you guys all know that I do the financial thing, you know, and then, you know, like the Federal Reserve today had that, you know, 300 or 33 trillion, I guess they broken through the banking systems and stuff, you know, four years ago.

1:36:01 Even eight years ago when Trump first went in, the syndicate had lots and lots of money and they still had lots and lots and lots of power within the banking systems, the monetary systems as well. You know, and then when Trump came in, there were a lot of things that were going on in the background, like within the international banking, you know, like that.

1:36:22 banking of international settlements and with the Basel III and then the Basel IV protocols that were, you know, they're starting to enforce these things and stuff. So I think that a lot of the money started getting kind of seized up with the beta tests, with the ISOs, you know, regarding the movement of money. There's so many validators or bots, AI, that track and monitor all these different things that they're seeing.

1:36:49 We're also like, you know, how like Colonel Towner and Bridget and because they did talk about, you know, like the infiltration within the governments, the Operation Gladio. And I do fully believe.

1:37:02 that Operation Gladio was within the banking and the monetary systems. When Trump came in, there was still so much money. People were paying a lot of taxes. Businesses were making lots of money. And the tax system, in my opinion, is also another laundering. So the vaults were fairly full. And these operations and things are very, very expensive.

1:37:25 So then when the COVID hit, the big companies, of course, made lots of money and the politicians did too. There's still lots and lots of money in the vaults within the Federal Reserve. So he ended up giving out a whole bunch of money to the citizens for COVID relief, for PUA and all those other things. And that did cost a lot of money within the vaulting and stuff like that within the monetary – well, here in the United States. So they've gotten more –

1:37:53 desperate and drastic. So when we have these huge big manipulations or ups and downs within the markets, there's a private ledger that the banking and all these different things have.

1:38:05 the derivatives that you guys hear a lot about. So there's a whole separate system. So not only within the law system, they have the two-tier system, but they also have it within the banking, the monetary, the investing, all kinds of other stuff. So a lot of this stuff, I believe, is being exposed and things like that. And they're running out of money. And they are literally, like Colonel Towner said,

1:38:32 You know, they're getting really desperate. So, you know, they're good, you know, and they like these big things. So whether it's the Olympics or other things where, you know, other places or other continents or other countries that are having festivities, music festivals, I know throughout Europe, there's huge music festivals, too. It's going to be a very spooky time. And my daughter's there for the next two months. So I'm nervous. Sorry. Oh, well.

1:38:59 Yeah, and obviously you have let her know about the, you know, kind of the operational security aspect of taking care of herself. Because there are venues that make it a target-rich environment for these maniacs. And I just believe that there's going to be a crescendo. I would love to be wrong, but...

1:39:28 If I look at history, in every election leading up to a patriot in a particular country getting elected and having a groundswell of support behind them, all shit breaks loose. So that's kind of the pattern that we've established. That's what my expectation is. I would love for it to come in somewhere much lower.

1:39:56 than that, like as in not at all. It's just not realistic to expect that given the desperateness of the situation for them, which, you know, I think is a good thing.

1:40:10 Sally, go ahead. Well, I was going to say one more thing. And in France, also, they've had so many different large venues blow up, whether it was like the sports arena, you know, different venues that they've blown up over the last, say, 15 years. Because I always feel a lot of this stuff are beta tests, too. That's all I did. Oh, absolutely. You know, they love going into the soccer stadiums. They had the one in Belgium that they sent in a bunch of skinheads that were paid operators.

1:40:39 to agitate and create the stampede that killed a bunch of people. It's just what they do. Yeah. Sally? You'll have to remember, too, is the FBI sent out a warning May 14th, warning a terror attack possible on Pride events. So, guys, that's definitely on the table there. So they're already broadcasting in a tent. Yeah. Good point. Also, I wanted one last thing to say.

1:41:11 By the end of the month, the U.S. dollar tether is no longer. Just an FYI. I love the way you do that. Sunshine? Talking about these stadiums and stuff, Stella, like out of the country, my daughter, her friend was here yesterday just to hang by the pool. He plays for Kansas City. And I said, do you have any games?

1:41:41 in the season next year you know over overseas and he said no and thank goodness because I'm worried about attacks over there and this is a young person that's I mean he's thinking about this he's he's 27 years old you know um and uh he doesn't want to be going over there because he's nervous about attacks at uh stadiums and that well he needs to be worried about the attacks here

1:42:09 He does. He does. And he is. But it's pretty cool to talk to somebody that's young. And, you know, I mean, his name is Mike Dana. He's very educated in all of this stuff. And it's really cool to talk to him about it, you know, openly and stuff. So, you know, what I've noticed is we have been told.

1:42:37 that, you know, everybody looks like these purple haired and thinks like them. My experience is the exact opposite. For about every 100 young kids, and I meet them all the time because my son-in-law is the president of our local rugby team, you know, and those guys are anywhere from 20 to 30. And we're around them all the time.

1:43:03 And we also have like a young Republicans club that we go and talk to. And granted, that particular venue is all pretty much conservative, but very liberal socially. They're much more skeptical and on to the government than any of us.

1:43:33 And I honestly believe that's why the government hates TikTok, because so much of that shit has gotten around on TikTok that our government's effed up that they don't want that information out. And they're much more informed than what we've been led to believe. So I've been pleasantly surprised talking with most of them. I'll just say that. And

1:44:05 Because we're in a college town, a lot of the people that are on his rugby team are not from America. They're from Australia. They're from England. They're from Germany. And so I really enjoyed being able to have those conversations with all of them. Sally, go ahead. Since you bring up younger kids being informed, so my son is 19. Last summer, we sat out with his friends just by the campfire.

1:44:34 The things that they were talking about, they knew about 9-11, and from an educational standpoint, because they were going into welding school, so their teacher was explained to how certain things couldn't happen the way they did. But anyway, they are way more educated, and they're like, he's the one who got me, telling me that Biden was stupid and Trump was the way to go at 18 years old. He's like, Mom, you're stupid for wanting to vote for Biden. Yes, guys, I voted for Biden. Regrets, okay?

1:45:04 Anyway, but he's the one who told me and I saw it got me down the path of learning. And so he got me to think differently so that they're a lot smarter and they can influence people. Yeah, I agree. And that's why every time we get the chance, we will go to any of those kinds of meetings in order to be able to have those conversations kind of more in a mentorship kind of way.

1:45:30 And I definitely think that's a good thing. So with that, I think we've got all of the questions answered. And don't forget tonight, 1030, I will be on Eye of the Storm on Badlands Media. And then I'll be back here tomorrow at noon. Colonel, if I may. I'm sorry. If I may. I have one observation here. And that is when you give these.

1:46:02 spaces, you actually go into the reasons as to why. And for this one, I didn't hear it, but I did do some searching on Wiki just to find out what the heck was going on. And I came up with this little nugget as to why the bombings occurred.

1:46:23 On 19 July 2005, the Home Secretary, Charles Clark, announced in Parliament the fast-tracking of a trimmed-down anti-terror bill, for which Frost Party support had been secured, to become law by the end of the year. The new law would make criminal acts preparatory to terrorism, possibly to include

1:46:47 the accessing of any websites offering knowledge of terror tactics and bomb-making information, seeking or providing terrorists training domestically or overseas, and indirect incitement to terrorism. The law became the Terrorism Act in 2006. So that may be the reason why the bomb didn't launch. Thank you, Colonel. Yeah, that's a good point.

1:47:19 Sure, absolutely. That's definitely a good point. Generally, as we've all come to realize, that these domestic terror events that they unleash on us are all generated because of either laws, elections, whatever.

1:47:50 Also keep in mind that I think I did mention that Tony Blair was in office at the time. And there was all kinds of machinations about him and his, I was trying to compare him.

1:48:20 Yeah, he was still in the labor party at the time. They had a real hard go of it. He's not very well thought of in, I don't know if any of them are. When you go and look at the different PMs that they've had, the prime ministers that they've had for, gosh, I don't know. Other than Harold Wilson,

1:48:51 who I'm going to talk about him next time just a little bit, because they basically did to Harold Wilson what they did to Trump. And there's lots of things there that we'll talk about next time. But yeah, that legislation, obviously, just like 9-11 happened, and then we got our version of that. They basically was doing that all over Europe, having some type of an event.

1:49:19 in order for them to pass similar legislation, and then they could get it into the EU, and blah, blah, blah. Go ahead, Sally. I'll make this super, super quick. Stellar and Trumpfrog, I just wanted to thank you for, ever since I joined your spaces, it got me more involved in my local election, and today I'm officially voting in my primaries for the first time, so you guys got me to start paying attention to people in my own state instead of globally and nationally, so thank you very much for that, and I just wanted,

1:49:51 Publicly, thank you. That's awesome. Everybody should be involved. That makes me feel really good. I think everyone needs to do what they can. You got to protect your backyard. National elections don't mean a damn thing. We do got to vote in the national election, but where the problems are, they happen locally. So that's awesome, Sally. Thank you. That's so awesome. Yay! We just had a sheriff here, 30 years old.

1:50:22 And he has three children under five and a pregnant wife that was just murdered yesterday morning on a police chase. So please keep these people in your prayers, too, because they're really trying to do what they can and see something, say something, because this is heartbreaking. I agree. Okay.

1:50:55 We're going to go ahead and sign off at this point, and I'll see you here tomorrow at noon and hopefully in the chat on Eye of the Storm tonight. Thanks, everybody. Thank you, Colonel Tanner, Bridget, and Cousinet. You guys are amazing. Thank you, Stella.

Entities here

Julian Assange25 Sheldon Adelson19 Donald Trump17 David Morales15 Operation Gladio14 2005 London bombings10 Zohar Lahab8 Peter Power8 NATO7 Las Vegas Sands6 Brian Nagel6 King's Cross5 Mossad5 UC Global5 BBC5 WikiLeaks4 Daniel Adigwe4 France4 Mike Pompeo4 Luton railway station4 Secret Service3 London3 Tony Blair3 2024 Summer Olympics3 Jair Bolsonaro3 Julie Nicholson3 Operation Condor2 Russell Square2 Paris2 1987 King's Cross fire2 Panorama: London's Under Attack2 Home Office2 Otto Skorzeny2 Visor2 Samantha Badham2 Harold Wilson2 Tony Robbins2 Hasib Hussain2 Dost Mohammed Khan2 Bridget2

Claims made here

David Morales member_of Spanish Gladio Network host_asserted ▶ 14:51

“The proposal never made it to the floor for a vote. It was alleged that Adelson's establishments were used for blackmail purposes in concert with the CIA and Mossad, blah, blah, blah. Assange was spie…”

David Morales spied_on Julian Assange host_asserted ▶ 14:51

Zohar Lahab recruited David Morales book_quoted ▶ 18:27

“Quote, according to court documents and testimony by a former business associate employee of Morales, it was Adelson's top bodyguard, an Israeli-American named Zohar Lahab, it's Z-O-H-A-R, and his las…”

Zohar Lahab member_of Mossad host_asserted ▶ 18:56

“After their first meeting in Vegas, the two security professionals became close friends, visiting each other overseas and speaking frequently. He appears to have Mossad ties. His presence in the 90s i…”

Brian Nagel member_of Secret Service host_asserted ▶ 20:44

“was the top cybercrime investigator for the U.S. Secret Service. Yes, a Mossad-linked asset was the top cybercrime investigator inside the Secret Service. He was given a medal of commendation from the…”

Brian Nagel member_of Las Vegas Sands host_asserted ▶ 23:00

“and feeding it back to U.S. intelligence so that they could blackmail them into being CIA informants. Here's a quote. Throughout this period, Adelson's Las Vegas Sands employed Brian Nagel, N-A-G-E-L,…”

David Morales spied_on Julian Assange host_asserted ▶ 24:23

“In a October 2009 email, Stratfor analysis detailed Najal's offer for a contract for Stratfor to conduct proactive monitoring, spying, on security threats against the Las Vegas Sands Hotel around the …”

Mike Pompeo ordered_assassination_of Julian Assange host_asserted ▶ 28:04

“It was initiated under an apparent watch of Mike Pompeo, who labeled WikiLeaks a hostile non-state intelligence agency. The operation appears to have been managed by Le Havre from its inception. Adels…”

2005 London bombings carried_out_attack Hasib Hussain host_asserted ▶ 33:37

“and 784 are injured. Many who lived were permanently disabled as a result of the bomb blast. And it says there were three young men from Pakistan, Mohammed Khan, who was 30, Shahaz Tawir,…”

2005 London bombings carried_out_attack Jermaine Lindsay host_asserted ▶ 33:37

“and 784 are injured. Many who lived were permanently disabled as a result of the bomb blast. And it says there were three young men from Pakistan, Mohammed Khan, who was 30, Shahaz Tawir,…”

2005 London bombings carried_out_attack Shahzad Tanweer host_asserted ▶ 33:37

“and 784 are injured. Many who lived were permanently disabled as a result of the bomb blast. And it says there were three young men from Pakistan, Mohammed Khan, who was 30, Shahaz Tawir,…”

2005 London bombings carried_out_attack Dost Mohammed Khan host_asserted ▶ 33:37

“and 784 are injured. Many who lived were permanently disabled as a result of the bomb blast. And it says there were three young men from Pakistan, Mohammed Khan, who was 30, Shahaz Tawir,…”

John Reid member_of House of Commons host_asserted ▶ 37:39

“train later on with that short of a window in order to get into London. Yet almost a year later, in June 2006, John Reed, who was the Home Secretary, kind of like our HHS guy, solemnly informed the Ho…”

Bridget exposed 2005 London bombings host_asserted ▶ 38:42

“Excuses. Would not any train have sufficed? Why the obsession with trying to synchronize explosions on three specific subway trains? What happened, or more accurately, did not happen at the Luton stat…”

Peter Power member_of Visor host_asserted ▶ 46:15

“Power, can't make that name up, suddenly sprang up out of nowhere on nationwide BBC television and radio. He stated that his security services company, Visor, B-I-S-O-R, was paid to run a crisis drill…”

Reed Elsevier funded Visor host_asserted ▶ 51:57

“Only three years later did Peter Power finally state that the business and security service company Reed Elsevier, E-L-S-E-V-I-E-R, was behind the commission. It can be safely stated that Power was we…”

Peter Power member_of Scotland Yard host_asserted ▶ 52:50

“The ambitious off-duty Scotland Yard inspector took control of the train after barging into a driver's compartment and seizing the controls. When the driver protested at this rude invasion of the Lond…”

Ian Blair member_of Scotland Yard host_asserted ▶ 53:19

“Another of those strange coincidences that seemed to follow Mr. Power around, a certain Ian Blair, his future superior at the London police, was also on duty during the deadly blaze. The designs were …”

Daniel Adigwe witnessed 2005 London bombings host_asserted ▶ 58:14

“by the police and intelligence services. He received the full no truth or left behind treatment. His account would seem to supply graphic evidence pointing to all of the events on January 7th as a mas…”

Christophe Chabot member_of French anti-terrorist service host_asserted ▶ 1:04:28

“indicate that apparently the first teams that crawled over the wreckage, broken bodies, remnants of charred clothing, and enormously power explosive had been used. The French anti-terrorist chief, Chr…”

2005 London bombings carried_out_attack London host_asserted ▶ 1:10:17

“All you need to know about whether or not those two bombings were an Operation Gladio event, because they 100% were. And it's amazing that our governments have been allowed to basically get away with …”

Operation Gladio carried_out_attack 2005 London bombings host_asserted ▶ 1:10:17

Sheldon Adelson member_of Cuban exile groups host_asserted ▶ 1:12:49

“And I read several articles about the one guy that runs his security team. He hung out with all of the Cuban exile groups in Miami that we've talked about repeatedly recently, which are known Operatio…”

Cuban exile groups member_of Operation Gladio host_asserted ▶ 1:12:49

NATO founded Operation Gladio host_asserted ▶ 1:29:22

“NATO is the one that created Operation Gladio. NATO is the one that coordinated all the training. NATO is the one that deployed the OAS that had been trained by Otto Skorzeny into Dallas that day. And…”

NATO attempted_assassination_of Charles de Gaulle host_asserted ▶ 1:33:26

“When you go back and you look at history, you realize we would not have been the first to pull out of NATO. France did it. Charles de Gaulle did it because this same NATO organization was trying to ki…”

Charles de Gaulle removed_from_power NATO host_asserted ▶ 1:33:26

Charles Clarke headed Home Office host_asserted ▶ 1:46:23

“On 19 July 2005, the Home Secretary, Charles Clark, announced in Parliament the fast-tracking of a trimmed-down anti-terror bill, for which Frost Party support had been secured, to become law by the e…”

2005 London bombings targeted_for_regime_change Terrorism Act 2006 host_asserted ▶ 1:46:47

“the accessing of any websites offering knowledge of terror tactics and bomb-making information, seeking or providing terrorists training domestically or overseas, and indirect incitement to terrorism.…”

Tony Blair member_of Labour Party (UK) host_asserted ▶ 1:48:20

“Yeah, he was still in the labor party at the time. They had a real hard go of it. He's not very well thought of in, I don't know if any of them are. When you go and look at the different PMs that they…”